Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework

Ecosystem Services - Tập 9 - Trang 83-97 - 2014
Adam P. Hejnowicz1, David G. Raffaelli1, Murray A. Rudd1, Piran C.L. White1
1Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal, 2001, Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources, World Development.,, 29, 1649, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8

Agrawal, 2008, Changing governance of the world׳s forest, Science, 320, 1460, 10.1126/science.1155369

Bebbington, 1999, Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty, World Dev., 27, 2021, 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7

Bennett, 2013

Bond, I., 2007. Payments for watershed services: A review of the literature. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, pp. 1-17.

Bond, 2010

Campbell, 2010, Navigating trade-offs: working for conservation and development outcomes, Ecol. Soc., 15, 16, 10.5751/ES-03380-150216

Carney, 1998

2013

Cooper, 2010, 1

1997

Davis, Z.G., Pullin, A.S., 2006. Do hedgerow corridors increase the population viability of woodland species? Systematic Review No. 8. Part A. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, pp. 1-40 〈http://www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Completed_Reviews/SR8a.pdf〉

Fisher, 2008

Green, 2008

Holmes, 2011, Conservation׳s friends in high places: neoliberalism, networks and transnational conservation elites, Glob. Environ. Politics, 11, 1, 10.1162/GLEP_a_00081

Landell-Mills, 2002

Milder, 2010, Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries, Ecol. Soc., 15, 4, 10.5751/ES-03098-150204

Miranda, M., Porras, I., Moreno, M.L., 2003. The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: a quantitative field survey and analysis of the Vrilla watershed. Markets for Environmental services No. 1. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, pp. 1-75.

Ostrom, 2005

Petticrew, 2006, Relevance, rigour and systematic reviews, 7

Pirard, 2010

Popay, 2006

Rio+20, 2012. Corporate Sustainability Forum. 〈http://csf.compact4rio.org/events/rio-20-corporate-sustainability-forum/custom-19-251b87a2deaa4e56a3e00ca1d66e5bfd.aspx〉.

Smith, 2005

Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K., Ott, C., 2010. State of watershed payments: an emerging marketplace. Ecosystem Marketplace: 〈www.foresttrends.org/documents/files/doc_2438.pdf〉

Mayrand, 2004

Waage, S., Mulder, I., Kate, K.T., Scherr, S., Roberts, J.P., Hawn, A., Hamilton, K., Bayon, R., Carrol. N., 2007. Investing in the Future: An Assessment of Private Sector Demand for Engaging in Markets and Payments for Ecosystem Services. PESAL Papers Series FAO, Rome, Italy and Forest Trends, Washington, D.C.

World Resources Institute (WRI) in collaboration with United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, and World Bank, 2005. World Resources 2005: The Wealth of the Poor – Managing Ecosystems to fight Poverty. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.

Wunder, 2005

Wunder, 2006, Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?, Ecol. Soc., 11, 1, 10.5751/ES-01831-110223