Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mike H. & Simon M. (2008) Research Note 1: Glossary of Intermediaries. University of Salford, SURF Centre, Salford, UK.
Lee, 2007, Payments for Environmental Services and Poverty Reduction: Risks and Opportunities
Huang M. & Upadhyaya S. (2007) Watershed-based payment for environmental services in Asia. Working Paper No. 06–07. Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM CRSP), Office of International Research, Education, and Development (OIRED), Virginia Tech, Virginia, USA.
Blagescu M. & Young J. (2006) Capacity development for policy advocacy: current thinking and approaches among agencies supporting civil society organisations. ODI Working Paper 260. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
Fraser, 2008, Protecting Country: Indigenous Governance and Management of Protected Areas, 19
Mapedza E. & Mandondo A. (2002) Co-management in the Mafungautsi State Forest area of Zimbabwe: what stake for local communities? WRI Working Paper Number 5. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Arifin B. (2005) Institutional constraints and opportunities in developing environmental service market: lessons from institutional studies in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre Working Paper. World Agroforestry Centre, Southeast Asia Regional Office, Bogor, Indonesia.
Ravnborg, 2007, Payments for Ecosystem Services: Issues and Pro-poor Opportunities for Development Assistance
van der Meulen B ., Nedeva M. & Braun D. (2005) Intermediaries, organisation, and processes: theory and research issues. Position Paper for PRIME Workshop, 6–7 October 2005, The Netherlands [www document]. URL http://www.prime-noe.org/Local/prime/dir/News/Call%20for%20papers/Position%20Paper%20Workshop%20IntermedOrg.pdf
Bracer C. , Scherr S. , Molnar A. , Sekher M. , Ochieng B. O. & Sriskanthan G. (2007) Organisation and governance for fostering pro-poor compensation for environmental services: CES Scoping Study Issue Paper No. 4. ICRAF Working Paper No. 39. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bendell, 2006, Debating NGO Accountability
Pham, 2008, Pro-poor payments for environmental services: challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam, Public Administration and Development, 28, 363, 10.1002/pad.513
Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. & Kongphan-Apirak M. (2008) Reducing forest emissions in Southeast Asia: a review of drivers of land-use change and how payments for environmental services (PES) schemes can affect them. CIFOR Working Paper No. 41. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
Moss, 2009, Organizing water: the hidden role of intermediary work, Water Alternatives, 2, 16
Baumann P. (2000) Equity and efficiency in contract farming schemes: the experience of agricultural tree crops. ODI Working paper 139. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
Borrini-Feyerabend, 2004, Indigenous and Local Communities and Protected Areas: Towards Equity and Enhanced Conservation
Nørlund R. , Tran N.C. & Nguyen D.T. (2003) Dealing with the donors: the politics of Vietnam's comprehensive poverty reduction and growth strategy. Policy Papers 4/2003. Institute of Development Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Providoli A.I. (2009) Shangri-La Workshop 2009 (18–22 May 2009): Sustainable Land Management in the Highlands of Asia, Northwest Yunnan, China [www document]. URL http://www.icimod.org/enews/enews.php?print=1&id=30
Bakker, 2008, The ambiguity of community: debating alternatives to private-sector provision of urban water supply, Water Alternatives, 1, 236
McIver, 2007, The Community Intermediaries Research Project
Hovland I. (2003) Communication of research for poverty reduction: a literature review. ODI Working Paper 227. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
Johnson C. , Deshingkar P. & Start D. (2003) Grounding the state: poverty, inequality and the politics of governance in India's Panchayats. ODI Working Paper 226. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
van Noordwijk M ., Leimona B. , Emerton L. , Tomich P.T. , Velarde J. S. , Kallesoe M. , Sekher M. , & Swallow B. (2007) Criteria and indicators for environmental service compensation and reward mechanisms: realistic, voluntary, conditional and pro-poor. CES Scoping Study Issue Paper no. 2, ICRAF Working Paper no. 37. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
Landell-Mills, 2002, Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series
Bonnal, 2005, Proceedings of the African Regional Workshop: Preparing for the Next Generation of Watershed Management Programmes and Projects, 117
Pollard A. & Court J. (2005) How civil society organisations use evidence to influence policy processes: a literature review. ODI Working Paper 249. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
World Agroforestry Center (2009) National Workshop on ‘Linkage of Forest Protection, Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation: Issues and Approaches in Vietnam’ [www document]. URL http://www.worldagroforestry.org/af2/node/115?q=node/208
Campbell B.M. & Shackleton S. (2001) The organisational structures for community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa [www document]. URL http://www.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a6.htm
Johnson C. (2001) Towards accountability: narrowing the gap between NGO priorities and local realities in Thailand. ODI Working Paper 149. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
Leimona B. & Lee E. (2008) Pro-poor payment for environmental services: some considerations. January Brief. World Agroforestry Centre, and Bangkok, Thailand: Regional Community Forestry Training Center, Bogor, Indonesia.