What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acción Ecólogica, 2010, Servicios Ambientales y Sus Impactos en el Ecuador
Adams, 2004, Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty, Science, 306, 1146, 10.1126/science.1097920
Albán, 2011, Mecanismos relacionados con servicios ambientales como una herramienta para conservación de los páramos, 231
Bebbington, 1997, Social capital and rural intensification: local organizations and islands of sustainability in the rural Andes, Geograph. J., 189, 10.2307/3060182
Bebbington, 2000, Reencountering development: livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 90, 495, 10.1111/0004-5608.00206
Berdegué, 2011, Latin America: the state of smallholders in agriculture
Borner, 2010, Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: scope and equity implications, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1272, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003
Brockington, 2011, Ecosystem services and fictitious commodities, Environ. Conserv., 38, 367, 10.1017/S0376892911000531
Brown, 2003, Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy, Clim. Policy, 3, S41, 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.004
Buytaert, 2006, Human impact on the hydrology of the Andean paramos, Earth Sci. Rev., 79, 53, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.002
Buytaert, 2007, The effects of afforestation and cultivation on water yield in the Andean paramo, Forest Ecol. Manage., 251, 22, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.035
Carr, 2009, The population, agriculture, and environment nexus in Latin America: country-level evidence from the latter half of the twentieth century, Popul. Environ., 30, 222, 10.1007/s11111-009-0090-4
Clements, 2010, Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1283, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010
Corbera, 2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services, Dev. Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
Corbera, 2007, Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America, Glob. Environ. Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005
Corbera, 2012, Ecosystem services: heed social goals, Science, 335, 655, 10.1126/science.335.6069.655-c
Corbera, 2009, Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme, Ecol. Econ., 68, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
Costa, 2011, A participatory framework for conservation payments, Land Use Policy, 28, 423, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.003
Cranford, 2011, Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 71, 89, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.007
de Koning, 2011, Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: the Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 531, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.007
De Zaldivar, 2008, From agrarian reform to ethnodevelopment in the highlands of Ecuador, J. Agrarian Change, 8, 583, 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00181.x
Dempsey, 2012, Ecosystem services: tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 36, 758, 10.1177/0309132512437076
Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecol. Econ., 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Farley, 2007, Grasslands to tree plantations: forest transition in the Andes of Ecuador, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 97, 755, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00581.x
Farley, 2010, Pathways to forest transitions: local case studies from the Ecuadorian Andes, J. Latin Am. Geogr., 9
Farley, 2011, Compensation for ecosystem services: an evaluation of efforts to achieve conservation and development in Ecuadorian paramo grasslands, Environ. Conserv., 48, 393, 10.1017/S037689291100049X
Farley, 2013, Changes in carbon storage under alternative land uses in biodiverse Andean grasslands: implications for payment for ecosystem services, Conserv. Lett., 6, 21, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00267.x
Garcia-Amado, 2011, Efficiency of payments for environmental services: equity and additionality in a case study from a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico, Ecol. Econ., 70, 2361, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.016
Gong, 2011, Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1292, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.017
Grieg-Gran, 2005, How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 1511, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002
Jack, 2008, Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105, 9465, 10.1073/pnas.0705503104
Jokisch, 2002, Migration and agricultural change: the case of smallholder agriculture in highland Ecuador, Hum. Ecol., 30, 523, 10.1023/A:1021198023769
Klooster, 2003, Forest transitions in Mexico: institutions and forests in a globalized countryside, Prof. Geogr., 55, 227, 10.1111/0033-0124.5502010
Kollmair, 2010, Addressing equity and poverty concerns in payments for environmental services, Mt. Forum Bull., 12
Kosoy, 2007, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
Kosoy, 2008, 39, 2073
Kosoy, 2007, Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America, Ecol. Econ., 61, 446, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
Landell-Mills, 2002, Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor, Int. Inst. Environ. Dev. Lond.
Luck, 2009, Protecting ecosystem services and biodiversity in the world's watersheds, Conserv. Lett., 2, 179, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00064.x
MAE, 2009
McAfee, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services in mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 100, 579, 10.1080/00045601003794833
MEA, 2005
Milder, 2010, Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries, Ecol. Soc., 15, 4, 10.5751/ES-03098-150204
Miranda, 2003, The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: a quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed, Int. Inst. Environ. Dev. Lond
Muñoz-Pina, 2008, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results, Ecol. Econ., 65, 725, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
Muradian, 2013, Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions, Conserv. Lett., 6, 274, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
Muradian, 2010, Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1202, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
Muradian, 2012, Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 1, 93, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
Pagiola, 2008, Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica, Ecol. Econ., 65, 712, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033
Pagiola, 2005, Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 237, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
Pagiola, 2008, Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 299, 10.1017/S1355770X08004270
Redford, 2009, Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature, Conserv. Biol., 23, 785, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x
Reed, 2011, REDD plus and the indigenous question: a case study from ecuador, Forests, 2, 525, 10.3390/f2020525
Rosa, 2004, Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas, Int. Forest. Rev., 6, 187, 10.1505/ifor.6.2.187.38401
Schloegel, 2010, Payments for the Protection of Watershed Services: A Potential Conservation Tool for Improving the Protection of Paper Parks in Latin America, 3
Schloegel, 2012
Shapiro-Garza, 2013, Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico's national payments for ecosystem services programs: four sites of articulation and hybridization, Geoforum, 46, 5, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.018
Sklenar, 2001, Diversity of zonal paramo plant communities in Ecuador, Divers. Distrib., 7, 113, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2001.00101.x
Southgate, 2009, Paying for watershed services in Latin America: a review of current initiatives, J. Sustain. Forest., 28, 497, 10.1080/10549810902794493
Van Hecken, 2012, The viability of local payments for watershed services: empirical evidence from Matiguas, Nicaragua, Ecol. Econ., 74, 169, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.016
Vásconez, 2006, Los páramos ecuatorianos
Vignola, 2010, Decision-making by farmers regarding ecosystem services: factors affecting soil conservation efforts in Costa Rica, Land Use Policy, 27, 1132, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.003
Vira, 2009, Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: beware the silver bullet, Conserv. Lett., 2, 158, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00063.x
Wunder, 2005
Wunder, 2006, Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?, Ecol. Soc., 11, 23, 10.5751/ES-01831-110223
Wunder, 2007, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conserv. Biol., 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x
Wunder, 2008, Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 279, 10.1017/S1355770X08004282
Wunder, 2013, When payments for environmental services will work for conservation, Conserv. Lett., 6, 230, 10.1111/conl.12034
Wunder, 2008, Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador, Ecol. Econ., 65, 685, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.004
Wunder, 2008, Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries, Ecol. Econ., 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010