Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alix-Garcia, J.M., 2005. A tale of Two Communities and Other Deforestation Stories. Agricultral and Resource Economics, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA, p. 116.
Alix-Garcia, 2004, A tale of two communities: explaining deforestation in Mexico, World Development, 33, 219, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.010
Alix-Garcia, 2006, The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payment for environmental services, Environment and Development Economics, 13, 375, 10.1017/S1355770X08004336
Alix-Garcia, 2008, The role of calibrated compensation and risk in designing payments for environmental services, Environment and Development Economics, 13, 375, 10.1017/S1355770X08004336
Alix-Garcia, J., Shapiro, E.N., et al., 2012. Forest conservation and slippage: evidence from Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services program. Land Economics.
Assies, 2008, Land tenure and tenure regimes in Mexico, Journal of Agrarian Change, 8, 33, 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00162.x
Bailey, 2009, Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: technocentrism, ecocentrism, and the carbon economy, Environment and Planning A, 41, 2324, 10.1068/a40342
Bakker, 2005, Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 542, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x
Barnes, 2009, The evolution and resilience of community-based land tenure in rural Mexico, Land Use Policy, 26, 393, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.007
Barry, 1995
Bennett, 2008, China’s sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual?, Ecological Economics, 65, 699, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017
Boyd, 2009, Governing the clean development mechanism: global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects, Environment and Planning A, 41, 2380, 10.1068/a41341
Bray, D.B., 1997. La reconstrucción permanente de la naturaleza: Organizaciones campesinas y desarollo popular sustentable. In: Paré, L., Bray, D.B., Burstein, J., Martínez, S. (Eds.), Semillas para el Cambio en el Campo: Medio Ambiente, Mercados y Organizaciones Campesina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
Bray, 2005
Brockington, 2008
Brown, 2003, Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy, Climate Policy, 3, 41, 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.004
Bruijnzeel, 2004, Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104, 185, 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015
Bumpus, 2008, Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets, Economic Geography, 84, 127, 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00401.x
Calderón Hinojosa, F., 2007. “Discurso del presidente Felipe Calderón Hinojosa durante la “Presentación del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007–2012”, en Palacio Nacional, Ciudad de México.” Discursos. <http://www.energia.gob.mx/webSener/portal/index.jsp?id=226> (retrieved 30.10.09).
Carlsen, L., 2003. The Mexican Farmer’s Movement: Exposing the Myths of Free Trade. Americas Program Policy Report, Feb 25, http://www.iatp.org/files/Mexican_Farmers_Movement_Exposing_the_Myths_of.htm (retrieved 10.2.13).
Collier, 2002
CONAFOR, 2002. Programa Estratégia Forestal para México 2025. <http://www.conafor.gob.mx/portal/docs/subsecciones/normateca/PEF_2025.pdf> (retrieved 05.07.09).
CONAFOR, 2009. Programa de pago por servicios ambientales. Expo Forestal, Mexico City, Mexico, CONAFOR.
CONAFOR, 2010. Visión de México sobre REDD+: Hacia una estrategia nacional. Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico, Comisíon Nacional Forestal.
CONAFOR, 2012. Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico. D. o. E. S. o. Forests. Comisión Nacional Forestal de México, Zapopan, Mexico. p. 34.
Corbera, 2008, Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: marketing forest carbon in Mexico, World Development, 36, 1956, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.010
Corbera, 2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services, Development and Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
Corbera, 2009, Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme, Ecological Economics, 68, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
Corbera, 2007, Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America, Global Environmental Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005
Corbera, 2011, Rights to land, forests and carbon in REDD+: insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica, Forests, 2, 301, 10.3390/f2010301
Corson, 2010, Shifting environmental governance in a neoliberal world: US Aid for conservation, Antipode, 42, 576, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00764.x
Costanza, 1992, Natural capital and sustainable development, Conservation Biology, 6, 37, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
Costanza, 2000, Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services, Ecosystems, 3, 4, 10.1007/s100210000002
Daily, 1997, Ecosystem services: Benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems, Issues in Ecology, 2, 2
Daily, 2000, The value of nature and the nature of value, Science, 289, 395, 10.1126/science.289.5478.395
Dempsey, J., Robertson, M.M., 2012. Ecosystem services: tensions, impurities and points of engagement within neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography.
Dove, M., 2004. Shade: throwing light on politics and ecology in contemporary Pakistan. In: Paulson, S., Gezon, L.L. (Eds.), Political Ecology across Spaces, Scales and Social Groups. Rutgers University Press, pp. 217–238.
Escobar, 1999, Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology (and comments and replies), Current Anthropology, 40, 1, 10.1086/515799
FAO, 2010
Fletcher, 2012, Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica, Geoforum, 43, 402, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.008
FMCN, 2007. History of the Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. FMCN. <http://www.mexicanfund.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=78> (retrieved 30.10.09).
Fox, 1995, Governance and rural-development in Mexico – state intervention and public accountability, Journal of Development Studies, 32, 1, 10.1080/00220389508422399
Goldman, 2005
Hanemann, 1988, Economics and the preservation of biodiversity, 193
Harvey, 2003
Harvey, 2005
Harvey, 2005
Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., et al., 2007. False promises. In: Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S., Robbins, P. (Eds.), Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–21.
Honey-Roses, 2011, A spatially explicit estimate of avoided forest loss, Conservation Biology, 25, 1032, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x
Ibarra, 2011, When formal and market-based conservation mechanisms disrupt food sovereignty: impacts of community conservation and payments for environmental services on an indigenous community of Oaxaca, Mexico, International Forestry Review, 13, 318, 10.1505/146554811798293935
INE, 2010. Situación general existente en las comunidades agrarias con respecto al manejo de los recursos naturales. El ejido y la conservación del Medio Ambiente en México. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico City, Mexico, p. 25.
Instituto-de-Investigaciones-Juridicas, 2007. Constitución Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos: Titulo Primero – Capitulo I de las Garantias Individuales (Artículo 27). Información Jurídica, June 28, 2007. <http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/fed/9/28.htm?s=> (retrieved 08.07.07).
Jansson, 1994
Klooster, 2003, Forest transitions in Mexico: institutions and forests in globalized countryside, Professional Geographer, 55, 227, 10.1111/0033-0124.5502010
Klooster, 2003, Campesinos and Mexican forest policy during the twentieth century, Latin American Research Review, 38, 94, 10.1353/lar.2003.0018
Kumar, 2008, Valuation of ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective, Ecological Economics, 64, 808, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008
Leff, E., Argueta, A., et al., 2002. Más allá del desarrollo sustenible: La construcción de una racionalidad ambiental para la sustenabilidad: Una visión desde América Latina. In: Leff, E., Ezcurra, E., Pisanty, I., Romero Lankao, P. (Eds.), La Transición hacia el Desarrollo Sustentable: Perspectivas de América Latina y el Caribe. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lovbrand, 2006, The climate as political space: on the territorialisation of the global carbon cycle, Review of International Studies, 32, 217, 10.1017/S0260210506006991
Lovell, 2009, Carbon offsetting: sustaining consumption?, Environment and Planning A, 41, 2357, 10.1068/a40345
Mansfield, 2004, Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of north pacific fisheries, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 565, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00414.x
Marielle, 2003, Propuestas para valorar la función ambiental de la agricultura campesina, InterCambios, 3
McAfee, 1999, Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and the rise of green developmentalism, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 133, 10.1068/d170133
McAfee, 2012, The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets, Development and Change, 43, 105, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x
McAfee, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, and the state, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 1, 10.1080/00045601003794833
McCarthy, 2004, Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism, Geoforum, 35, 275, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003
McCarthy, 2001, Common pool resource appropriation under costly cooperation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 297, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1164
McElwee, 2012, Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: panacea or problem?, Geoforum, 43, 412, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010
Merino Pérez, L., Segura, G., 2002. Las políticas forestales y de conservación y sus impactos en las comunidades forestales en México. In: Bray, D.B., Merino Pérez, L., Barry, D. (Eds.), Los Bosques Comunitarios de México. Mexico City, Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Ecología and the Consejo Civil Mexicano de Silvicultura Sostentible, pp. 77–98.
Merino Pérez, L., González, A., et al., 2004. El programa de pago por servicios ambientales hidrológicos: Revisión crítica y propuestas de modificación. Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible, A.C., Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 1–28.
Merino Pérez, L., Rodríguez, J., Ortiz, G., García, A., 2008. Estudio estratégico sobre el sector forestal Mexicano. Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostentible, A.C., Mexico City, Mexico.
Muñoz Piña, 2003, Recrafting rights over comon property resources in Mexico, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, 129, 10.1086/380104
Muñoz Piña, C., Guevara, A., et al., 2005. Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico’s Forests: Analysis, Negotiations and Results. <http://www.ine.gob.mx/dgipea/download/draft_ecological_economics.pdf> (retrieved 02.06.07).
Muñoz Piña, C., Guevara, A., et al., 2006. Pagar por los servicios hidrológicos del bosque en México. In: Pagiola, S., Landell-Mills, N., Bishop, J. (Eds.), Los Mecanismos Basados en el Mercado para la Conservación y el Desarollo. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Muñoz Piña, 2008, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results, Ecological Economics, 65, 725, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
Mutto Osborne, 2011, Carbon forestry and agrarian change: access and land control in a Mexican rainforest, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 859, 10.1080/03066150.2011.611281
Nelson, 2003, Making global initiatives local realities: carbon mitigation projects in Chiapas, Mexico, Global Environmental Change, 13, 19, 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00088-2
Norgaard, 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 1219, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009
Pagiola, S., 2009. Financing Forest Conservation the REDD Initiative. International Parlimentary Hearing on Forest Protection and the Model of Payment for Ecosystem Services, Earth University, Costa Rica.
Peluso, N.L., 2007. Enclosure and privatization of neoliberal environments. In: Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S., Robbins, P. (Eds.), Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, pp. 89–93.
Peluso, 2008, Claiming the grounds for reform: Agrarian and environmental movements in Indonesia, Journal of Agrarian Change, 8, 377, 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00174.x
Phelps, 2010, Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?, Science, 328, 312, 10.1126/science.1187774
Ponette-González, A., Weathers, K.C., et al., 2009. Water inputs across tropical montane landscape in Veracruz, Mexico: synergistic effects of land cover, rain and fog seasonality, and interannual precipitation variability. Global Change Biology 1–18.
Robertson, 2000, No net loss: wetland restoration and the incomplete capitalization of nature, Antipode, 32, 463, 10.1111/1467-8330.00146
Robertson, 2004, The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance, Geoforum, 35, 361, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002
Robertson, 2006, The nature that capital can see: science, state and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 367, 10.1068/d3304
Robertson, 2007, Discovering price in all the wrong places: the work of commodity definition and price under neoliberal environmental policy, Antipode, 39, 500, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00537.x
Rocheleau, 2008, Political ecology in the key of policy: from chains of explanation to webs of relation, Geoforum, 39, 716, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.02.005
Roth, 2012, Market-oriented conservation governance: the particularites of place, Geoforum, 43, 363, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.006
Sanchez-Azofeifa, 2007, Costa Rica’s payment for environmental services program: Intention, implementation, and impact, Conservation Biology, 21, 1165, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x
Scott, 2009, Something in the air: civic science and contentious environmental politics in pos-apartheid South Africa, Geoforum, 40, 373, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.002
Segura, G., 2000. Mexico’s Forest Sector and Policies: A General Perspective. Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millenium. International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
SEMARNAT, 2008. “México asume compromisos al 2010 en materia de conservación y uso sostenible de la biodiversidad. Sala de Prensa del Gobierno Federal. <http://www.presidencia.gob.mx/prensa/semarnat/?contenido=36040> (retrieved 30.10.09).
Shapiro-Garza, E.N., in press. Contesting market-based conservation: payments for ecosystem services as a surface of engagement for rural social movements in Mexico. Human Geography.
Stevenson, M., 2009. Mexico: ‘Green Fund’ Better than Carbon Credits, June 22, 2009. <http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090623/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_mexico_climate_forum_1> (retrieved 26.06.09).
Stolle-McAllister, 2005
Tacconi, 2012, Redefining payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 73, 29, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
Televisa, F., 2011. Servicios Ambientales de Oaxaca. Fundación Televisa. <http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150240516441246.315729.18716216245&type=3> (retrieved 12.05.12).
Toledo, V.M., 2005. El dilema del zapatismo: ¿izquierdismo o sustentabilidad? La Jornada 207, September 3.
UNORCA, 2007. UNORCA’s Social Movements. <http://www.unorca.org.mx/ingles/movementactivities.htm> (retrieved 31.07.07).
Vhugen, 2011
Wilder, 2006, Paradoxes of decentralization: water reform and social implications in Mexico, World Development, 34, 1977, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.026
World Bank, 2006. Project Information Document (PID) Appraisal Stage: Environmental Services, Project ID P087038. <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2006/03/06/000090341_20060306135543/Rendered/PDF/35419.pdf> (retrieved 12.01.07).
World Bank, 2007. Two new World Bank Carbon Facilities will help fight climate change and deforestation. News & Broadcast. <http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:21506175~menuPK:51062077~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html (retrieved 27.10.09).
Wroughton, L., 2008. World Bank Names Countries for Forest Carbon Fund. <http://communities.thomsonreuters.com/Carbon/pages/print/posts/?bid=cc5b7f86-fd9a-4d0e-aede-50372eace1a0&mode=Full> (retrieved 25.06.09).
Wunder, 2007, The efficiency of payment for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x
WWF, 2003. Commercial Debt-for-Nature Swaps. Conservation Finance. <http://www.cbd.int/doc/external/wwf/wwf-commercial-swaps-en.pdf> (retrieved 30.10.09).