Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem?

Adhikari, B., 2009. Market-Based Approaches to Environmental Management: Lessons from Payment for Environmental Services in Asia. Working Paper # 134, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Altieri, 1999, Ecological impacts of Chile’s neoliberal policies, with special emphasis on agroecosystems, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1, 55, 10.1023/A:1010063724280 An, Pham Van, 2009. Implementation of policy on pilot payment for forest environment services in Lam Dong province, Viet Nam. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, 29 June–1 July, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand. ARBCP, 2009. Alternative livelihoods for improved biodiversity conservation. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, Bangkok, Thailand, 29 June–1 July, 2009. Asquith, 2008, Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia, Ecological Economics, 65, 675, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.014 Bakker, 2005, Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 542, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x Bakker, 2008, The ambiguity of community: debating alternatives to private-sector provision of urban water supply, Water Alternatives, 1, 236 Bakker, K., 2010. The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10:1177/0309132510376849. Barney, 2005 Borras, 2003, Questioning market-led agrarian reform: experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa, Journal of Agrarian Change, 3, 367, 10.1111/1471-0366.00059 Brenner, 2002, Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”, Antipode, 34, 349, 10.1111/1467-8330.00246 Brockington, 2008 Bulte, 2008, Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives, Environmental and Development Economics, 13, 245, 10.1017/S1355770X08004348 Bury, 2005, Mining mountains: neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods, and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca, Environment and Planning A, 37, 221, 10.1068/a371 Büscher, 2008, Conservation, neoliberalism, and social science: a critical reflection on the SCB 2007 annual meeting in South Africa, Conservation Biology, 22, 229, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00894.x Cam, Hoang, 2007. On Being ‘Forest Thieves’: State Resource Policies, Market Forces, and Struggles over Livelihood and Meaning of Nature in a Northwestern Valley of Vietnam. Working Paper Series 6, Chiang Mai University, Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development, Chiang Mai. Castella, 2006, Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam, Land Use Policy, 23, 147, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.07.004 Castree, 2008, Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation, Environment and Planning A, 40, 141, 10.1068/a3999 Cerney, 2005, Different roads to globalization: neoliberalism, the competition state, and politics in a more open world, 1 Chomitz, 1999, Financing environmental services: the Costa Rican experience and its implications, Science of the Total Environment, 240, 157, 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00310-1 Clement, 2008, Linking reforestation policies with land use change in northern Vietnam: why local factors matter, Geoforum, 39, 265, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.008 Clement, 2009, Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: analyzing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes, Land Use Policy, 26, 458, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.06.003 Clements, 2010, Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia, Ecological Economics, 69, 1283, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010 Corbera, 2007, Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America, Global Environmental Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005 deKoninck, R., 1999. Deforestation in Vietnam. International Development Research Council, Ottawa, Canada. Dixon, 2003, Developmental lessons of the Vietnamese transitional economy, Progress in Development Studies, 3, 287, 10.1191/1464993403ps066oa Dixon, 2002, State, capital, and resistance to globalisation in the Vietnamese transitional economy, Environment and Planning A, 34, 599, 10.1068/a34128 EIA, 2008. Borderlines: Vietnam’s Booming Furniture Industry and Timber Smuggling in the Mekong Region. Environmental Investigation Agency, London. Engel, 2008, Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: the case of Indonesia, Ecological Economics, 65, 799, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.028 Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 Estache, 2001, Utilities privatization and the poor: lessons and evidence from Latin America, World Development, 29, 1179, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00034-1 Evans, 2005, Embedding neoliberalism through statecraft: the case of market reform in Vietnam, 219 Evans, M., Gough, I., Harkness, Susan, McKay, A., Thanh, Huyen Dao, Le Thu, Ngoc Do, 2007. How Progressive is Social Security in Viet Nam? UNDP Vietnam, Hanoi. Fortunel, 2009, From collectivization to poverty: natives and state-owned enterprises in Vietnam’s Central Highlands, 397 FSSP, 2007. Viet Nam Forest Sector Indicators and 2005 Baseline Data Report. Forest Sector Support Partnership and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. Futemma, 2003, Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: implications for agricultural intensification, Human Ecology, 31, 369, 10.1023/A:1025067721480 General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 2007. Results of the 2006 Rural, Agricultural and Fisheries Census. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi. Goldman, 1993, Tragedy of the commons or the commoners’ tragedy: the state and ecological crisis in India, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 4, 49, 10.1080/10455759309358565 Grieg-Gran, 2005, How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America, World Development, 33, 1511, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002 Ha, 2008 Haglund, 2010 Harvey, 2003 Harvey, 2005 Hefner, 1990 2007 Holland, 2010 Humphreys, 2009, Discourse as ideology: neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy, Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 319, 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.008 Hung, Nguyen Sinh, 2010. Thong bao: Y kien ket luan cua Pho Thu tuong Nguyen Sinh Hung tai hoi nghi so ket chinh sach thi diem chi tra dich vu moi truong rung, theo Quyet dinh so 380/QD-TTg ngay 10 thang 4 nam 2008 cua Thu tuong Chinh phu. State Government Office, Hanoi. Ibarra Gené, 2007, The profitability of payments for environmental services (PES) in the Reserva Forestal Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica, Forest Policy and Economics, 10, 7, 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.01.001 Igoe, 2007, Neoliberal conservation: a short introduction, Conservation and Society, 5, 432 Igoe, 2010, A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion, Antipode, 42, 486, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00761.x Jack, B., Kousky, C., Sims, K., 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9465. Jakobsen, 2007, The effects of land tenure policy on rural livelihoods and food sufficiency in the upland village of Que, North Central Vietnam, Agricultural Systems, 94, 309, 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.09.007 Jourdain, 2009, Payments for environmental services in upper-catchments of Vietnam: will it help the poorest?, International Journal of the Commons, 3, 64, 10.18352/ijc.97 Karsenty, 2007, Questioning rent for development swaps: new market- based instruments for biodiversity acquisition and the land-use issue in tropical countries, International Forestry Review, 9, 503, 10.1505/ifor.9.1.503 Kerkvliet, 1995, Village-state relations in Vietnam: the effect of everyday politics on decollectivization, Journal of Asian Studies, 54, 396, 10.2307/2058744 Kerr, 2002, Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India, World Development, 30, 1387, 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00042-6 Kiss, 2002, Ecology: direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 1718, 10.1126/science.1078104 Klepeis, 2003, Neoliberal policy and deforestation in southeastern Mexico: an assessment of the PROCAMPO program, Economic Geography, 79, 221, 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00210.x Kosoy, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002 Leimona, B., Villamor, G., Noordwijk, M.v., Fauzi, A., Utaira, R., 2008. IFAD Grant Project TAG-534 Completion Report: Developing Mechanisms to Reward the Upland Poor in Asia for Environmental Services that They Provide. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Office, Bogor. Lemos, 2006, Environmental governance, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297, 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621 Li, 1999, Marginality, power and production: analysing upland transformations, 1 Li, 2002, Local histories, global markets: cocoa and class in upland Sulawesi, Development and Change, 33, 415, 10.1111/1467-7660.00261 Li, 2007, Practices of assemblage and community forest management, Economy and Society, 36, 263, 10.1080/03085140701254308 Li, 2010, Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession, Current Anthropology, 51, 385, 10.1086/651942 Liljestrom, 1998 Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., Chen, X., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9477–9482. Liverman, 2004, Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 734 Liverman, 2006, Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America, Annual Reviews of Environment and Resources, 31, 327, 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.102403.140729 Loftus, 2001, Of liquid dreams: a political ecology of water privatization in Buenos Aires, Environment and Urbanization, 13, 179, 10.1177/095624780101300215 London, 2004, Rethinking Vietnam’s mass education and health systems, 127 Mai, Huynh Thi, 2009. Introduction on payments for environmental services in the Biodiversity Law. Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, Bangkok, Thailand, 29 June–1 July, 2009. Mäler, 2008, Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9501, 10.1073/pnas.0708856105 Mansfield, 2004, Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 565, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00414.x Mansfield, 2008, Introduction: property and the remaking of nature–society relations, 1 MARD, 2008. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Plan Idea Note (R-PIN): Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. MARD, 2010a. Decree 99/2010/ND-CP. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. MARD, 2010b. Dien Tich Rung Va Dat Lam Nghiep Toan Quoc; Ban hanh kem theo Quyet dinh so 2140/QD-BNN-TCLN ngay 09/8/2010. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. 1988 McAfee, 1999, Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism, Environment and Planning D, 17, 133, 10.1068/d170133 McAfee, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 579, 10.1080/00045601003794833 McCarthy, 2004, Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism, Geoforum, 35, 275, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003 2005 McElwee, 2004, You say illegal, I say legal: the relationship between ‘illegal’ logging and land tenure, poverty, and forest use rights in Vietnam, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 19, 97, 10.1300/J091v19n01_06 McElwee, 2008, Forest environmental income in Vietnam: household socio-economic factors influencing forest use, Environmental Conservation, 35, 1, 10.1017/S0376892908004736 McElwee, 2009, Reforesting ‘bare hills’ in Vietnam: social and environmental consequences of the 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Program, Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38, 325, 10.1579/08-R-520.1 McNally, R., 2010. Experience with REDD pilot projects in Viet Nam: SNV, ICRAF and JICA. In: Presentation at Katoomba XVII – Hanoi, Taking the Lead: Payments for Ecosystem Services in Southeast Asia, June 23–24, 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam. <http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/k17/Richard%20McNally%20KatoombaSNV.pdf> (accessed 10.10.10). Mellac, 1998, La gestion des espaces forestiers au Nord Vietnam: Un modèle et son application, Cahiers d’Outre Mer, 51, 367, 10.3406/caoum.1998.3703 Mertz, 2007, Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries, Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2729, 10.1007/s10531-007-9216-0 Meyfroidt, 2008, The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam, Land Use Policy, 25, 182, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.001 Meyfroidt, 2008, Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts, Global Change Biology, 14, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01575.x Meyfroidt, 2009, Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 16139, 10.1073/pnas.0904942106 Morris, 2008, Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism, Geoforum, 39, 1215, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.004 Morse, 2009, Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a Costa Rican biological corridor, Ecology and Society, 14, 23, 10.5751/ES-02688-140123 Neef, 2009, Rewarding the upland poor for saving the commons? Evidence from Southeast Asia, International Journal of the Commons, 3, 1, 10.18352/ijc.194 Ngai, Nguyen Ba, Tan, Nguyen Quang, Sunderlin, W., Yasmi, Y., 2009. Forestry and Poverty Data in Viet Nam: Status, Gaps, and Potential Uses. RECOFT, Rights and Resources International, and Vietnam Forestry University, Hanoi. Nguyen, 2008, Internalizing externalities into capacity expansion planning: the case of electricity in Vietnam, Energy, 33, 740, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.014 O’Connor, 2008, Governing the global commons: linking carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in tropical forests, Global Environmental Change, 18, 368, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.012 Ogle, 1998 Owusu, 1998, Current convenience, desperate deforestation: Ghana’s adjustment program and the forestry sector, The Professional Geographer, 50, 418, 10.1111/0033-0124.00130 Pagiola, 2008, Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua, Environmental and Development Economics, 13, 299, 10.1017/S1355770X08004270 Peck, 2003, Neoliberalizing space, Antipode, 34, 380, 10.1111/1467-8330.00247 Perreault, 2008, Popular protest and unpopular policies: state restructuring, resource conflict, and social justice in Bolivia, 239 Perrot-Maître, 2006 Peters, J., 2008. The pilot payments for forest environmental services policy in Vietnam and PES pilot sites in the Dong Nai River Basin. In: Presentation to IWLEARN Regional Workshop on Payments for Environmental Services. <http://www.iwlearn.net/abt_iwlearn/events/pes-workshop-hanoi>. Petheram, 2010, Listening to locals on payments for environmental services, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1139, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.002 Phelps, 2010, Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?, Science, 328, 312, 10.1126/science.1187774 Phu, Nguyen Tuan, 2009. The policy of Vietnam Government on pilot payment for forest environmental services. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, 29 June–1 July, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand. Phuc, To Xuan, Santiago, C., 2010. Vietnam Leads Southeast Asia in Payments for Ecosystem Services. Katoomba Group Ecosystem Marketplace. <http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=7593&section=news_articles&eod=1> (accessed 05.09.10). Pingali, 1997, Prospects for sustaining Vietnam’s reacquired rice exporter status, Food Policy, 22, 345, 10.1016/S0306-9192(97)00023-7 Pokorny, 2010, Market-based conservation of the Amazonian forests: revisiting win–win expectations, Geoforum Polanyi, 1957 Porras, 2008 Prudham, 2004, Poisoning the well: neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario, Geoforum, 35, 343, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.08.010 Prudham, 2008, The fictions of autonomous invention: accumulation by dispossession, commodification, and life patents in Canada, 14 Robertson, 2004, The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance, Geoforum, 35, 361, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002 Robertson, 2006, The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 367, 10.1068/d3304 Rojas, 2002 Rowcroft, 2008, Frontiers of change: the reasons behind land-use change in the Mekong Basin, Ambio, 37, 213, 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[213:FOCTRB]2.0.CO;2 Sandewall, 2010, The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam, Ambio, 10.1007/s13280-010-0089-1 Shanks, E., O’Reilly, S., 2005. Enhancing the Poverty Reduction Focus of Forest Sector Strategies, Policies and Management Practices in Vietnam. Report for the World Bank, March 2005, Hanoi. Shimamoto, 2004, Forest sustainability and the free trade of forest products: cases from Southeast Asia, Ecological Economics, 50, 23, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.004 Sierra, 2006, On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica, Ecological Economics, 59, 131, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010 Sikor, 1995, Decree 327 and the restoration of barren land in the Vietnamese highlands Sikor, 2001, The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: did it cause the expansion of forests in the northwest?, Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 1, 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00041-1 Sikor, 2004, Local government in the exercise of state power: the politics of land allocation in Black Thai villages, 171 Sikor, 2007, Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s Central Highlands, World Development, 35, 2010, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.011 Sikor, 2007, Exclusive versus inclusive devolution in forest management: insights from forest land allocation in Vietnam’s Central Highlands, Land Use Policy, 24, 644, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.04.006 Sjöholm, 2006 SNV, 2010. Deforestation Drivers and Community Assessment: Tien Hoang and Dong Nai Thuong Communes. Netherlands Development Organization, Hanoi. Sowerwine, 2004, Territorialisation and the politics of highland landscapes in Vietnam: negotiating property relations in policy, meaning and practice, Conservation and Society, 2, 97 Spronk, 2007, Struggles against accumulation by dispossession in Bolivia: the political economy of natural resource contention, Latin American Perspectives, 34, 31, 10.1177/0094582X06298748 SRV, 1992. Lieu Thong Ke Nong, Lam, Ngu Nghiep Viet Nam (1976–1991). NXB Thong Ke, Hanoi. SRV, 1999. Decision of the Government No. 187 QD-TTg on the Renovation of Organization and Mechanisms for Management of State Forest Enterprises. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. SRV, 2000. Guidance for Implementation of the Decision 187/1999/QD-TTg of 16 September 1999 by the Prime Minister on Reform of Organization and Management Mechanism of State Forest Enterprises (SFE). Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and Ministry of Finance, Hanoi. Sunderlin, 2005 Swinkels, R., Turk, C. 2006. Explaining Ethnic Minority Poverty in Viet Nam: A Summary of Recent Trends and Current Challenges. Background paper for Ministry of Planning and Investment Meeting on Ethnic Minority Poverty, Hanoi, September. Tallis, 2008, An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9457, 10.1073/pnas.0705797105 Tan, 2006, Forest devolution in Vietnam: differentiation in benefits from forest among local households, Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 409, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.003 Tan, 2008, The household economy and decentralization of forest management in Vietnam, 187 Tan, Nguyen Quang, Ngai, Nguyen Ba, Thanh, Tran Ngoc, Sunderlin, W., Yasmi, Y., 2008. Forest Tenure Reform in Vietnam: Case studies from the Northern Upland and Central Highland Regions. RECOFT, RRI, and Vietnam Forestry University, Hanoi. Thanh, Nguyen Chi, Hess, J., 2010. Contributions of Winrock international and GTZ to the formulation and implementation of policy on payment for forest environmental services in Viet Nam. In: Presentation at Katoomba XVII – Hanoi, Taking the Lead: Payments for Ecosystem Services in Southeast Asia, June 23–24, 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam. <http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/k17/Nguyen%20Chi%20Thanh,%20Juergen%20Hess%20%20Winrock%20and%20GTZ%20in%20PFES%20for%20Viet%20Nam.pdf> (accessed 10.10.10). The, 2008, Payments for environmental services in Vietnam: an empirical experiment in sustainable forest management, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 25, 48, 10.1355/AE25-1E The, 2004 Thiha, 2007, Biophysical and policy drivers of landscape change in a central Vietnamese district, Environmental Conservation, 34, 164, 10.1017/S037689290700389X Tho, Ngo Dinh, Phuong, Pham Xuan, Nho, Bui Huy, Tuynh, Nguyen Huu, (Eds.), 2006. Cam nang nganh lam nghiep: chuong quan ly lam truong quoc doanh. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi. Thomas, B., 2010. Vietnam may Spur Privatization after $4.5 billion Shipyard Debt. Bloomberg Businessweek, August 08, 2010. Thuan, 2005 Thuy, 2008, Pro-poor payments for environmental services: challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam, Public Administration and Development, 28, 363, 10.1002/pad.513 Thuy, 2009, Lessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services: an analysis of projects in Vietnam, The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 31, 117, 10.1080/23276665.2009.10779359 Thuy, 2010, Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam, Environmental Conservation, 37, 64, 10.1017/S037689291000024X Turner, 2008, The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation, Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 25, 10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6 Turner, 2008, Imaginative and adaptive economic strategies for Hmong livelihoods in Lao Cai province, Northern Vietnam, Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 3, 158, 10.1525/vs.2008.3.3.158 UNHCR, 2002. Vietnam: Indigenous Minority Groups in the Central Highlands. UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva. UN-REDD, 2010. Design of a REDD Compliant Benefit Distribution System for Viet Nam. UN-REDD, Hanoi. USAID, 2009. Lam Dong Province Records First Hydropower Payments for Forest Conservation Under Pilot Environmental Services Policy. <http://vietnam.usaid.gov/?q=node/59> (accessed 05.09.10). Van Hecken, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view, Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 785, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006 Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 VietNamNet, 2010. General Warns against Turning over Forests to Foreign Investors, March 12, 2010. <http://www.vfej.vn/en/detail/22022/general_warns_against_turning_over_forests_to_foreign_investors> (accessed 05.09.10). Wertz-Kanounnikoff, 2008 Wilshusen, 2010, The receiving end of reform: everyday responses to neoliberalization in Southeastern Mexico, Antipode, 42, 767, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00772.x Win, T.L., 2009. Selling Nature to Preserve it Catches on in SE Asia. Reuters Alternet, 8 July. <http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/selling-nature-to-protect-it-catches-on-in-se-asia> (assessed 09.03.11). World Bank, 2005. State Forest Enterprise Reform in Vietnam. Rural Development and Natural Resources Division, World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank, 2009. Country Social Analysis: Ethnicity and Development in Vietnam. Social Development Department, World Bank, Washington DC. World Bank, 2010a. Aligning Public Spending with Strategic Priorities in the Forestry Sector. Social, Environment and Rural Sustainable Development Unit (EASER), Sustainable Development Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank, 2010b. Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Forest Law Enforcement and Governance. Social, Environment and Rural Sustainable Development Unit (EASER), Sustainable Development Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, World Bank, Washington, DC. Wunder, 2005 Wunder, 2007, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x Wunder, 2008, Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence, Environmental and Development Economics, 13, 279, 10.1017/S1355770X08004282 Wunder, 2005 Wunder, 2008, Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries, Ecological Economics, 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010 Wünscher, 2006, Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: increasing efficiency through spatial differentiation, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 45, 319 Zbinden, 2005, Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program, World Development, 33, 255, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012