Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Costanza R, 2005, Sustainability or Collapse: An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth, Dahlem Workshop Reports
8. Wells S. 2010. Pandora's Seed: The Unforeseen Cost of Civilization. New York: Random House. 230 pp.
Kahneman D, 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow
10. Pointing C. 2007. A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations. London: Penguin Books. 452 pp.
11. Williams M. 2003. Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 689 pp.
Scherr SJ, 2007, Farming with Nature: The Science and Practice of Ecoagriculture
2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis.
Thaler R, 2009, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness
Sukhdev P, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
Landell-Mills N, 2002, Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor
23. Van Noordwijk M. 2005. RUPES typology of environmental service worthy of reward. RUPES Work. Pap., World Agrofor. Cent. (ICRAF), Southeast Asia Reg. Program, Bogor, Indones.
24. Wunder S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occas. Pap. 42, Cent. Int. For. Res., Bogor, Indones.
27. Angelsen A, Wunder S. 2003. Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications. CIFOR Occas. Pap. 40, Cent. Int. For. Res., Bogor, Indones.
Akerlof GA, 2009, Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism
32. Van Noordwijk M, Chandler F, Tomich TP. 2004. An introduction to the conceptual basis of RUPES: rewarding upland poor for the environmental services they provide. RUPES Work. Pap., World Agrofor. Cent. (ICRAF), Southeast Asia Reg. Program, Bogor, Indones.
Ainslie G, 1992, Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person
37. Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, et al. 2011. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. In press
Carney D, 1998, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution Can We Make?, 3
Pagiola S, 2002, Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development
Perrot-Maître D, 2006, The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A “Perfect” PES Case?
White D, 2010, . Estimating the Opportunity Costs of REDD+: A Training Manual
Tinbergen J, 1991, Population, Technology, Lifestyle: The Transition to Sustainability, 52
Daily GC, 1997, Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems
55. Van Noordwijk M, Leimona B, Emerton L, Tomich TP, Velarde SJ, et al. 2007. Criteria and indicators for environmental service compensation and reward mechanisms: realistic, voluntary, conditional and pro-poor. ICRAF Work. Pap. 37, World Agrofor. Cent., Southeast Asia Reg. Program, Bogor, Indones.
56. Courtney P. 2010. Socio-economic impacts and benefits of agri-environment schemes in England. Presented at Soc. Dimens. Market-Based Environ. Incent. Int. Forum, Charles Darwin Univ., Darwin, Aust., 18–19 Nov.
Boardman AE, 2001, Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice
Ash N, 2010, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Manual for Assessment Practitioners
Scherr SJ, 2006, Developing Future Ecosystem Service Payments in China: Lessons Learned from International Experience.
68. Pagiola S, Landell-Mills N, Bishop J. 2002. Market-based mechanisms for forest conservation and development. See Ref. 42, pp. 1–13
69. Ortiz E, Kellenberg J. 2001. Program of payments for ecological services in Costa Rica. Work. Pap., FONAFIFO, San José, Costa Rica
2007, The State of Food and Agriculture 2007. Paying Farmers for Environmental Services.
Miranda M, 2003, The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica: A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed
Porras I, 2008, All That Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries
Forsyth T, 2003, Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science
78. Pascual U, Muradian R, Rodriguez LC, Duraiappah AK. 2009. Revisiting the relationship between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services. Ecosyst. Serv. Econ. Work. Pap. 1, Div. Environ. Policy Implement., UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya
79. Gouyon A. 2003. Rewarding the upland poor for environmental services: a review of initiatives from developed countries. RUPES Work. Pap. 2003-6, World Agrofor. Cent. (ICRAF), Southeast Asia Program, Bogor, Indones.
86. Leimona B. 2011. Fairly efficient and efficiently fair: success factors and constraints in payment and reward for environmental schemes in Asia. PhD thesis. Wageningen Univ. Res. Cent., Wageningen, Neth. 176 pp.
88. Greiner R. 2010. Payments for environmental services (PES): contribution to indigenous livelihoods. In Third International Conference on Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment,Cyprus, ed. K Aravossis, CA Brebbia, 3:163–74. Southampton, UK: WIT Press
Van Noordwijk M, 1997, Agrofor. Today, 9, 6
Zomer RJ, 2009, Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry
107. Van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Oborn I, Yatich T, eds. 2011. How Trees and People Can Co-Adapt to Climate Change: Reducing Vulnerability through Multifunctional Agroforestry Landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agrofor. Cent. (ICRAF). 133 pp.
110. Le Coq JF, Soto G, Hernandez CG. 2011. PES and ecolabel: a comparative analysis of their limits and opportunities to foster environmental services provision. See Ref. 166, pp. 237–64
112. Appleton AF. 2002. How New York City used an ecosystems services strategy carried out through an urban-rural partnership to preserve the pristine quality of its drinking water and save billions of dollars. A Pap. For. Trends, Tokyo, Nov.http://ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/cms_documents/NYC_H2O_Ecosystem_Services.pdf
113. Villamor GB, van Noordwijk M, Agra F, Catacutan D. 2007. Buyers' perspectives on environmental services (ES) and commoditization as an approach to liberate ES markets in the Philippines. ICRAF Work. Pap. 51, World Agrofor. Cent., Bogor, Indones.
Bemelmans-Videc ML, 1998, Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation
Sterner T, 2003, Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management.
Vatn A, 2005, Institutions and the Environment
Frey B, 1997, Am. Econ. Rev., 87, 746
Jack BK, 2008, Conserv. Biol., 23, 358
135. Jindal R, Kerr JM, Ferraro PJ, Swallow BM. 2012. Social dimensions of procurement auctions for environmental service contracts: evaluating tradeoffs between cost-effectiveness and participation by the poor in rural Tanzania. Land Use Policy. In press
Gutman P, 2003, From Goodwill to Payments for Environmental Services: A Survey of Financing Options for Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries
Jindal R, 2007, USAID PES Sourcebook: Lessons and Best Practices for Pro-Poor Payment for Ecosystem Services
143. Tipper R. 2002. Helping indigenous farmers to participate in the international market for carbon services: the case of Scolel Té. See Ref. 42, pp. 223–33
Chen X, 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 1812
Galudra G, 2011, Int. For. Rev., 13, 431
Akiefnawati R, 2010, Int. For. Rev., 12, 349
Pasha R, 2011, Payments for Ecosystem Services and Food Security, 275
157. Minang PA, van Noordwijk M. 2012. Design challenges for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins. Land Use Policy. In press
159. Hoang MH, Do TH, Pham MT, van Noordwijk M, Minang PA. 2012. Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy. In press
Jansson AM, 1994, Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability
164. Pascual U, Muradian R, Brander L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, et al. 2010. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. See Ref. 184, pp. 183–256
165. Tomich TP, Argumedo A, Baste I, Camac E, Filer C, et al. 2010. Conceptual frameworks for ecosystem assessment: their development, ownership, and use. See Ref. 58, pp. 71–115
166. Rapidel B, DeClerck F, Le Coq JF, Beer J, eds. 2011. Ecosystem Services from Agriculture and Agroforestry: Measurement and Payment. London: Earthscan. 414 pp.
167. Kumar P, Brondizio E, Elmqvist T, Gatzweiler F, Gowdy J, et al. 2010. Lessons learned and linkages with national policies. See Ref. 184, pp. 285–306
Monke EA, 1995, The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development
Tomich TP, 2005, Slash and Burn: The Search for Alternatives, 415
Harman O, 2011, The Price of Altruism: George Price and the Search for the Origins of Kindness
Sahlins MD, 1972, Stone Age Economics
Kumar P, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations.