Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers - Tập 37 Số 3 - Trang 386-401 - 2012
Morgan Robertson1
1Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA email: [email protected]

Tóm tắt

The development of markets in water quality, biodiversity and carbon sequestration signals a new intensification and financialisation in the encounter between nature and late capitalism. Following Neil Smith’s observations on this transformation, I argue that the commodification of such ‘ecosystem services’ is not merely an expansion of capital toward the acquisition or industrialisation of new resources, but the making of a new social world comparable to the transformation by which individual human labours became social labour under capitalism. Technologies of measurement developed by ecosystem scientists describe nature as exchange values, as something always already encountered in the commodity form. Examining these developments through specific cases in US water policy, I propose that examining this transformation can provide political ecology and the study of ‘neoliberal natures’ with a thematic unity that has been absent. I understand capital’s encounter with nature as a process of creating socially‐necessary abstractions that are adequate to bear value in capitalist circulation. Such an argument supersedes the issue of nature’s materiality and points toward a common language for the analysis of both humans and nature as two participants in the labour process. Political ecologists struggling with the commodification of nature have tended to overlook the social constitution of nature’s value in favour of explicit or implicit physical theories of value, often as more‐or‐less latent realisms. I suggest that critical approaches to nature must retain and elaborate a critical value theory, to understand both the imperatives and the silences in the current campaign to define the world as an immense collection of service commodities.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Altvater E, 1993, The future of the market: an essay on the regulation of money and nature after the collapse of ‘actually existing socialism’

Arreaga W, 2008, Rainforest Alliance, Richmond (Available at http://www.climate‐standards.org/projects/files/Paso_Pacifico_Rainforest_Alliance_CCBA_Validation_Audit_Report_08.pdf) accessed 21 October 2011, Validation assessment report for: Paso Pacifico in Rivas Province, Nicaragua

10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.014

10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x

10.1177/0309132510376849

BaldwinM F1985Establishing a wetland protection system under EPA’s Wetland Protection and Review Authorities Concept paper prepared for EPA Office of Federal ActivitiesMarch 1985 Baldwin Associates Great Falls VA

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x

Bio‐Business Support Services2004CH2M Hill’s Credit Trading Tent(http://www.fl‐panther.com/download/CH2_Credit_Trading.pdf) Accessed 19 April 2009

10.1068/a40157

10.1080/08941920120686

10.1177/096746080000700102

10.1007/s00267-004-0239-y

10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008

BusinessGreen2011Personal footprinting scheme slashes employees’ carbon emissionsBusinessGreen (Incisive Media Investments Ltd.) 29 April

10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00260.x

10.1191/0309132503ph428oa

10.1068/a39100

10.1068/a3999

Cogan D, 2008, Corporate governance and climate change: the banking sector

10.1177/0263276409358727

10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x

10.1016/0921-8009(89)90014-1

10.1038/387253a0

Cowardin L M, 1976, Interim classification of wetlands and aquatic habitats of the United States

Cronon W, 1983, Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England

Cronon W, 1991, Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West

Daily G C, 1997, Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, 365

Daily G C, 2002, The new economy of nature: the quest to make conservation profitable

Dempsey J, Ecosystem Services: tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism, Progress in Human Geography

Dimas S, 2008, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: an interim report

EPA OPPE [Office of Program and Policy Evaluation]1991Market‐based approach for wetland regulation Document held in Wetlands Mitigation Library USEPA Office of Wetlands Oceans and Watersheds Washington DC

ESA and USUCS [Ecological Society of America and US Union of Concerned Scientists]2006Ecosystem services(http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/invasive_species/ecosystemservices_poster.pdf) Accessed 16 April 2009

Foster J B, 2000, Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature

Fox J, 2008, Conservation and biodiversity banking: a guide to setting up and running biodiversity credit trading systems, 171

10.1068/d130275

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002247.x

10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x

Haraway D J, 1991, Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature

Harvey D, 1996, Justice, nature and the geography of difference

10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00424.x

10.1068/d379

10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00069-0

Horwood C, 2007, The new colour of money, Euromoney

KennyA2009When is credit stacking a double‐dip?(http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=7147?section=home) Accessed 5 November 2010

KilleenTandLightfootD2009Dear colleague letter: Environment Society and the Economy (ESE) Email sent February 2009 Directorate for Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate for Geosciences NSF 09‐031

10.2307/1057332

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x

10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO;2

Landell‐Mills N, 2002, Marketing forest environmental services – who benefits?

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00385.x

LeeL CandFetherstonK L1991The high medium and low blues or ‘why we suspect that a federal wetlands value classification scheme would be an administrative and technical bust’ prepared for Wetland Assessment Workshop Stone Mountain Georgia 26 February–1 March 1991Waterways Experiment Station US Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg MS

LiemonaBandLeeE2008Pro‐poor payment for environment and services: some considerations RUPES‐RECOFTC Brief January 2008Wageningen University and Research Center Wageningen

Mann G, 2007, Our daily bread: wages, workers and the political economy of the American West

10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00536.x

10.1002/9781444306750.ch

Marx K, 1973, Grundrisse

Marx K, 1976, Capital: a critique of political economy

10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00089-1

10.1080/00045601003794833

McElwaineA2005Multiple credit types for a single project Site: ‘Nutrient Trading Pilot MultiCredit Trading & Reverse Auction Projects: Conestoga River Watershed Pennsylvania’presented at the National Forum on Synergies Between Water Quality Trading and Wetland Mitigation Banking 12 July 2005 Washington DC. Forum report prepared by the Environmental Law Institute September 2005 (http://www.eli.org/pdf/wqtforum/presentations/McElwaine.pdf) Accessed 26 September 2011

MeyerJ L PalmerM A Bruce WallaceJ David AllanJ KarrJ R HartD D et al.2006Comments on Docket EPA‐HQ‐OW‐2006‐0020: compensatory mitigation for losses of aquatic resources 33 CFR parts 325 and 332 and 40 CFR part 230 letter submitted to the EPA Public Comment Docket June 2006

MEA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment], 2005, Ecosystems and human well‐being: synthesis

Mitchell T, 1988, Colonising Egypt

10.1525/9780520928251

NRC [National Research Council Committee on Assessing and Valuing the Services of Aquatic and Related Terrestrial Ecosystems], 2005, Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision‐making

O’Connor J, 1994, Is capitalism sustainable? Political economy and the politics of ecology, 152

O’Connor M, 1994, Is capitalism sustainable? Political economy and the politics of ecology, 125

10.7312/parr12174

10.1068/d4109

10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.011

10.1073/pnas.0907284107

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.009

10.1111/1467-8330.00146

10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002

Robertson M, 2008, The entrepreneurial wetland banking experience in Chicago and Minnesota, National Wetlands Newsletter, 30, 14

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00169.x

Scott J, 1998, Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed

ShawS PandFredineC G1956Wetlands of the United States: their extent and their values for waterfowl and other wildlifeUS Fish and Wildlife Service Washington DC

10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00091.x

Smith N, 1990, Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space

Smith N, 2007, Nature as accumulation strategy, Socialist Register, 16

SpethmannD2008Accessing investment capital for wetland streams and conservation Presented at the 11th national mitigation and ecosystem banking conference: banking on the environment Jacksonville Florida 8 May 2008

10.3898/NEWF.69.06.2010

Sullivan S, 2011, Banking nature? The financialization of environmental conservation

USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]2008Secretary’s Memorandum 1056‐001: Establishment of the Office of Ecosystem Services and Markets15 December 2008 (http://www.ocio.usda.gov/directives/doc/SM1056‐001.pdf) Accessed 16 April 2009

US EPA [United States Environmental Protection Agency]ndSlides accompanying’ Proposed Framework for a National Wetlands Categorization Program’ presented at Wetlands Mitigation Library USEPA Office of Wetlands Oceans and Watersheds Washington DC

10.1068/d7707

10.1080/08920757309361668

10.1080/08920757409361683

WilcherL1991Note. To: The Administrator. From: LaJuana Wilcher March 1991 held in Wetlands Mitigation Library USEPA Office of Wetlands Oceans and Watersheds Washington DC

Willamette Partnership2009Ecosytem credit accounting: pilot general crediting protocol: Willamette Basin Version 1.0September 1 2009 (http://www.willamettepartnership.org/ecosystem‐credit‐accounting) Accessed 28 December 2009

10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0065:WAYSRI]2.0.CO;2