Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win‐win solutions

Conservation Letters - Tập 6 Số 4 - Trang 274-279 - 2013
Roldán Muradian1, Murat Arsel2, Lorenzo Pellegrini2, Fikret Adaman3, Bernardo Aguilar4, Bina Agarwal5, Esteve Corbera6, Driss Ezzine de Blas7, Joshua Farley8, Géraldine Froger9, Eduardo García‐Frapolli10, Erik Gómez‐Baggethun11,6, John M. Gowdy12, Nicolás Kosoy13, J.F. Le Coq7,14, Pieter Leroy1, Peter H. May15, Philippe Méral16, P. Mibielli17, Richard B. Norgaard18, Begüm Özkaynak3, Unai Pascual19,20, Walter Pengue21, Tadeu Fabrício Malheiros22, Denis Pesche7, Romain Pirard23, Jesús Ramos-Martín6, Laura Rival24, Fernando Sáenz-Ségura15, Gert Van Hecken25, Arild Vatn26, Bhaskar Vira20, Kevin Urama27
1Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
2ISS, Erasmus University of Rotterdam the Netherlands
3Boğaziçi University, Turkey
4Fundación Neotrópica Costa Rica
5 University of Manchester, UK;
6Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
7CIRAD, France
8University of Vermont USA
9Université de Versailles, Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
10UNAM, Mexico
11Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
12Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute USA
13McGill University, Canada
14Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Costa Rica
15Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
16Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, France
17Universidade Estácio de Sá Brazil
18University of California, Berkeley, USA.
19Basque Centre for Climate Change & Ikerbasque Foundation for Science Spain
20University of Cambridge, UK
21Universidad de General Sarmiento Argentina
22Universidad del Valle, Colombia
23IDDRI France
24University of Oxford, UK
25Universiteit van Antwerpen Belgium
26Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway
27African Technology Policy Studies Network Kenya

Tóm tắt

AbstractIn this commentary we critically discuss the suitability of payments for ecosystem services and the most important challenges they face. While such instruments can play a role in improving environmental governance, we argue that over‐reliance on payments as win‐win solutions might lead to ineffective outcomes, similar to earlier experience with integrated conservation and development projects. Our objective is to raise awareness, particularly among policy makers and practitioners, about the limitations of such instruments and to encourage a dialogue about the policy contexts in which they might be appropriate.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199569687.001.0001

10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01752.x

Baland J‐M., 1996, Halting degradation of natural resources. Is there a role for rural communities

10.1126/science.1152110

10.1257/jel.50.2.368

10.4337/9781843766971

10.1016/0095-0696(90)90062-4

Burkett P., 2006, Marxism and ecological economics, 10.1163/9789047408567

Büscher B., 2012, Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti‐Drakensberg, South Africa, Con. & Soc, 10, 28

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00047.x

10.3982/ECTA7416

10.1111/j.1526-4629.2004.tb00079.x

10.1126/science.335.6069.655-c

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00208-2

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010

10.1126/science.1078104

10.1111/1467-6419.00150

Gneezy U., 2000, Pay enough or don't pay at all, J. Ec. Bev. Org., 39, 341

Gregersen H., 2010, Does the opportunity cost approach indicate the real cost of REDD+ ? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+, 24

Hughes R., 2001, Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of the ICDP literature

10.1126/science.1210297

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002

Krall L., 2012, Toward an integrated paradigm in heterodox economics—alternative approaches to the current eco‐social crises, 127

Karsenty A., Carbon rights, REDD+ and payments for environmental services, Env. Sci. & Pol.

10.1016/j.joep.2010.05.007

Le Coq J.F., 2012, Governing the provision of ecosystem services, 235

10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.010

10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x

10.1080/00045601003794833

10.1126/science.1155358

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006

10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009

10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.014

Oldekop J., Evaluating the effects of common‐pool resource institutions and market forces on species richness and forest cover in Ecuadorian indigenous Kichwa communities, Cons. Lett.

10.1017/CBO9780511807763

10.1073/pnas.0701886104

10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004

10.1093/reep/req006

10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.001

Polanyi Karl, 1944, The Great Transformation

Porras I., 2010, Fair and green? Social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010

10.3197/096327111X12997574391562

Titmuss R., 1970, The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy

10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01434-7

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018

Wells M., 1992, People and parks. Linking protected area management with local communities

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Letters

Tập 6 Số 4

274-279

Thông tin tác giả