International payments for biodiversity services: Review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches

Alix-Garcia, 2008, The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 375, 10.1017/S1355770X08004336 Arriagada, 2009, Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s Program of Payments for Environmental Services, J. Sustain. Forest., 28, 343, 10.1080/10549810802701192 Aukland, 2003, A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation projects, Clim. Policy, 3, 123, 10.3763/cpol.2003.0316 Babcock, 1997, Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities, Land Econ., 73, 325, 10.2307/3147171 Balmford, 2000, Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting, Conserv. Biol., 14, 597, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00000-i2.x Balmford, 2011, Bringing ecosystem services into the realworld: an operational framework for assessing the economic consequences of losing wild nature, Resour. Environ. Econ., 48, 161, 10.1007/s10640-010-9413-2 Barker, T., Mortimer, M., Perrings, C., 2009. Biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services. In: Kumar, Pushpam (Ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. <http://www.teebweb.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=VdteUfY8umU%3d&tabid=1018&language=en-US> (19.09.09). Barton, D.N., Faith, D., Rusch, G., Gjershaug, J.O., Castro, M., Vega, M., Vega, E., 2003. Spatial Prioritisation of Environmental Service Payments for Biodiversity Protection. Report SNR 4746/2003, NIVA (Norwegian Institute for Water Research), Norway. Bennett, 2008, China’s sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual?, Ecol. Econ., 65, 699, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017 Boumans, R., Costanza, R., 2007. The multiscale integrated Earth Systems model (MIMES): the dynamics, modelling and valuation of ecosystem services. In: Issues in Global Water System Research No. 2, “Global Assessments: Bridging Scales and Linking to Policy”. Report on the Joint TIAS-GWSP Workshop, University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, USA, May 10–11, 2007. <http://www.doc.utwente.nl/61129/1/Bers07global.pdf#page=104> (22.03.12). Boyd, 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecol. Econ., 63, 616, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 Brooks, 2006, Global biodiversity conservation priorities, Science, 313, 58, 10.1126/science.1127609 Bryant, 1997 Busch, J., 2010. Supplementary biodiversity payments for REDD+. In: Parker, C., Cranford, M. (Eds.), The Little Biodiversity Finance Book, second ed. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford, UK. Chilchinisky, G., Proctor, W., 2008. International Payments for Ecosystem Services (IPES). UNEP, Geneva, Switzerland and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. <http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/IPES%20Side%20Event%20Bonn/IPES%20SUM%20FINAL.pdf> (accessed January 2012). Chomitz, 2005, Opportunity costs of conservation in a biodiversity hotspot: the case of Southern Bahia, Environ. Dev. Econ., 10, 293, 10.1017/S1355770X05002081 Claassen, 2008, Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice, Ecol. Econ., 65, 737, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032 Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2008. BushTender: Rethinking Investment for Native Vegetation Outcomes – The Application of Auctions for Securing Private Land Management Agreements. State of Victoria, East Melbourne, Australia. Drechsler, 2011, Trade-offs in the design of cost-effective habitat networks when conservation costs are variable in space and time, Biol. Conserv., 144, 479, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.001 Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice – an overview of the issues, Ecol. Econ., 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 Farley, 2010, Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes, Ecol. Econ., 69, 2075, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.016 Ferraro, 2003, Conservation contracting in heterogenous landscapes: an application to watershed protection with threshold constraints, Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev., 32, 53, 10.1017/S1068280500002501 Ferraro, 2004, Targeting conservation investments in heterogenous landscapes: a distance function approach and application to watershed management, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 86, 905, 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00642.x Ferraro, 2008, Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029 Ferraro, 2002, The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments, Land Econ., 78, 339, 10.2307/3146894 Gibbons, 2011, Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?, J. Appl. Ecol., 48, 1218, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x Grieg-Gran, 2009, Costs of avoided deforestation as a climate change mitigation option, 11 Hajkowicz, 2007, Optimisation and the selection of conservation contracts, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 51, 39, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00345.x Hartshorn, 2005 Harvey, 2009, Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD, Conserv. Lett., 3, 53, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00086.x Hoekstra, 2005, Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection, Ecol. Lett., 8, 23, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x Hubermann, 2009, World heritage sites and the integration of biodiversity into an international PES framework, J. Sustain. Forest., 28, 456, 10.1080/10549810902794329 James, 1999 Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. Karousakis, K., van der Esch, S., Hansjürgens, B., Harvey, C., ten Brink, P., Trivedi, M., Vakrou, A., 2009. International PES: REDD and beyond. In: TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. <http://www.teebweb.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=vYOqLxi7aOg%3D&tabid=1019&language=en-US> (12.12.11). Larsen, 2011, Global priorities for conservation of threatened species, carbon storage, and freshwater services: scope for synergy?, Conserv. Lett., 4, 355, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00183.x Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D., Bennett, G., 2011. 2011 Update – State of Biodiversity Markets. Washington, DC: Forest Trends, 2011. <http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm> (Downloaded February 2012). McCarthy, 2008, Optimal investment in conservation of species, J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 1428, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01521.x MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005 Mittermeier, R.A., Robles Gil, P., Mittermeier, C.G., 1997. Megadiversity. CEMEX, Mexico City, Mexico. Mittermeier, 2003, Wilderness and biodiversity convention, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS), 100, 10309, 10.1073/pnas.1732458100 Moore, 2004, Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa, Biol. Conserv., 117, 343, 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.013 Muñoz-Piña, 2008, Paying for hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results, Ecol. Econ., 65, 725, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031 Murdoch, 2007, Maximizing return on investment in conservation, Biol. Conserv., 139, 375, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.011 Murray, 2009, Leakage from an avoided deforestation compensation policy: concepts, empirical evidence and corrective policy options, 151 Myers, 2000, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853, 10.1038/35002501 Naidoo, 2007, Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities, Biol. Conserv., 140, 40, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025 Nelson, 2009, Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 4, 10.1890/080023 Olson, 2002, The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 89, 199, 10.2307/3298564 Olson, 2001, Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: a new map of life on Earth, Bioscience, 51, 933, 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2 Ortiz, E., Sage Mora, L.F., Borge Carvajal, C., 2003. Impacto del Programa de Pago por Servicios Ambientales en Costa Rica como Medio de Reducción de la Pobreza en los Medios Rurales. RUTA, San José, Costa Rica. Pagiola, 2008, Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica, Ecol. Econ., 658, 712, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033 Pagiola, 2007, Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua, Ecol. Econ., 64, 374, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.014 Pattanayak, 2010, Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 4, 254, 10.1093/reep/req006 Pfaff, 2004, Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning: a conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica, Resour. Energy Econ., 26, 237, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.009 Rametsteiner, 2009, Economics of avoiding deforestation, 39 Rodrigues, A.S.L., et al. 2003. Global Gap Analysis: Towards a Representative Network of Protected Areas. Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science 5. Conservation International, Washington, DC. Rolfe, 2011, Comparing a best management practice scorecard with an auction metric to select proposals in a water quality tender, Land Use Policy, 28, 175, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.011 Sanchez-Azofeifa, 2007, Costa Rica’s payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact, Conserv. Biol., 21, 1165, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x Sanderson, 2002, The human footprint and the last of the wild, Bioscience, 52, 891, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 Sierra, 2006, On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica, Ecol. Econ., 59, 131, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010 Sohngen, 2009, Assessing the economic potential for reducing deforestation in developing countries, 49 Stattersfield, 1998 Villa, F., Ceroni, M., Bagstad, K., Johnson, G., Krivov, S., 2009. ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. Paper presented at 11th International BIOECON Conference, Venice, Italy, September 21–22, 2009. Wendland, 2010, Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar, Ecol. Econ., 69, 2093, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.002 Wilson, 2006, Prioritizing global conservation efforts, Nature, 440, 337, 10.1038/nature04366 Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42. CIFOR, Jakarta, Indonesia. Wunder, 2008, Taking stock: lessons learnt for the design of payments for environmental services programs, Ecol. Econ., 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010 Wünscher, T., 2009. Spatial Targeting of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica: A Site Selection Tool for Increasing Conservation Benefits. Doctoral Thesis. University of Bonn, Germany. <http://www.hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online/landw_fak/2009/wuenscher_tobias/index.htm> (accessed November 2010). Wünscher, 2008, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits, Ecol. Econ., 65, 822, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014 WWF and IUCN (World Wildlife Fund and International Union for Conservation of Nature), 1994–1997. Centres of Plant Diversity. A Guide and Strategy for the Conservation, vol. 3. IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge, UK. Zabel, 2008, Conservation performance payments for carnivore conservation in Sweden, Conserv. Biol., 22, 247, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00898.x Zabel, 2009, Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives, Ecol. Econ., 69, 126, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.001 Zabel, 2011, Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation: theoretical results and application to tiger conservation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 48, 287, 10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4