The quest for the “optimal” payment for environmental services program: Ambition meets reality, with useful lessons

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 37 - Trang 65-74 - 2013
Timm Kroeger1
1Central Science, The Nature Conservancy, 4245 N. Fairfax Dr. Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arrow, 1996, Is there a role for benefit–cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation?, Science, 272, 221, 10.1126/science.272.5259.221

Bagstad, 2011, ARIES—Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: a guide to models and data, version 1.0, n.1

Barbier, 2008, Coastal ecosystem‐based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values, Science, 319, 321, 10.1126/science.1150349

Boyd, 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63, 616, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002

Boyd, 2002, Landscape indicators of ecosystem service benefits, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 1371, 10.1111/1467-8276.00404

Brown, 2007, Defining, valuing and providing ecosystem goods and services, Natural Resources Journal, 47, 329

Buytaert, 2007, The effects of afforestation and cultivation on water yield in the Andean paramo, Forest Ecology and Management, 251, 22, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.035

Célleri, 2009, The hydrology of tropical Andean ecosystems: importance, knowledge status, and perspectives, Mountain Research and Development, 29, 350, 10.1659/mrd.00007

Chan, 2006, Conservation planning for ecosystem services, PLoS Biology, 4, e379, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379

Daily, 1997, Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems, Issues in Ecology, 2, 1

Dillaha, 2007, Payments for watershed services: regional synthesis, 7

Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

Escobedo, 2011, Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices, Environmental Pollution, 159, 2078, 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010

Ferraro, 2003, Conservation contracting in heterogeneous landscapes: an application to watershed protection with threshold constraints, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 53, 10.1017/S1068280500002501

Ferraro, 2008, Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029

Ferraro, 2006, Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments, PLoS Biology, 4, e105, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105

Goldman, 2010

Goldman-Benner, 2012, Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice, Oryx, 46, 55, 10.1017/S0030605311001050

Honey-Rosés, 2011, A spatially explicit estimate of avoided forest loss, Conservation Biology, 25, 1032, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x

Honey‐Rosés, 2009, To pay or not to pay? Monitoring performance and enforcing conditionality when paying for forest conservation in Mexico, Environmental Conservation, 36, 120, 10.1017/S0376892909990063

Jindal, 2007, Payments and conditionality

Kinzig, 2011, Paying for ecosystem services: promise and peril, Science, 334, 603, 10.1126/science.1210297

Konrad, 2011, Evaluating dam re-operation for freshwater conservation in the sustainable rivers project, River Research and Applications

Kroeger, 2012

Kroeger, 2007, An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands, Ecological Economics, 64, 321, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.021

Leimona, 2010, Payments for environmental services: the need for redefinition?, Mountain Forum Bulletin, X, 10

Line, 2003, Changes in a stream's physical and biological conditions following livestock exclusion, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 46, 287

Makarewicz, 2009, The impact of agricultural best management practices on downstream systems: soil loss and nutrient chemistry and flux to Conesus Lake, New York, USA, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 35, 23, 10.1016/j.jglr.2008.10.006

Meals, 2010, Lag time in water quality response to best management practices: a review, Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 85, 10.2134/jeq2009.0108

Meijerink, 2008, The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes, 61

Mendola, 2007, Farm household production theories: a review of “institutional” and “behavioral” responses, Asian Development Review, 24, 49, 10.1142/S0116110507500047

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005

Murdoch, 2007, Maximizing return on investment in conservation, Biological Conservation, 139, 375, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.011

Murdoch, 2010, Using return on investment to maximize conservation effectiveness in Argentine grasslands, PNAS, 107, 20855, 10.1073/pnas.1011851107

Murgueitio, 2004

Naidoo, 2006, Modeling opportunity costs of conservation in transitional landscapes, Conservation Biology, 20, 490, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00304.x

Naidoo, 2006, Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation, PLoS Biology, 4, 2153, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360

Naidoo, 2006, Integrating economic costs into conservation planning, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 681, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003

National Research Council, 2005

Opperman, 2009, Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers, Science, 326, 1487, 10.1126/science.1178256

Opperman, 2010, Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46, 211, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00426.x

Pagiola, 2007

Pattanayak, 2010, Show me the money: do payments supply ecosystem services in developing countries?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4, 254, 10.1093/reep/req006

Polasky, 2001, Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon, Land Economics, 77, 68, 10.2307/3146981

Porras, 2008, All that glitters: a review of payments for watershed services in developing countries, No. 11

Quintero, 2009, For services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes, Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1871, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.032

Salzman, 2000, Currencies and the commodification of environmental law, Stanford Law Review, 53, 607, 10.2307/1229470

Sommerville, 2009, A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services, Ecology and Society, 14, 34, 10.5751/ES-03064-140234

Southgate, 2007, Paying for watershed services in Latin America: a review of current initiatives, No. 07–07

Stanton, 2010

Tallis, 2009, Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural resources management, The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology: Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1162, 265

Tallis, 2011

Underwood, 2008, Protecting biodiversity when money matters: maximizing return on investment, PLoS One, 3, e1515, 10.1371/journal.pone.0001515

Wainger, 2001, Wetland value indicators for scoring mitigation trades, Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 20, 413

Wainger, 2004, Development of indicators to assess economic vulnerabilities to changes in ecosystem services: case study of counties in Maryland, USA, Environmental Management, 34, 730, 10.1007/s00267-003-0188-x

Wendland, 2010, Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar, Ecological Economics, 69, 2093, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.002

Wunder, 2005, Payment for environmental services: some nuts and bolts, #42

Wunder, 2007, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x

Wunder, 2008, Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador, Ecological Economics, 65, 685, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.004

Wünscher, 2008, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits, Ecological Economics, 65, 822, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014