Benefit Distribution and Equity in Ecuador's Socio Bosque Program

Society and Natural Resources - Tập 26 Số 10 - Trang 1170-1184 - 2013
Torsten Krause1, Lasse Loft2
1Lund University Centre of Excellence for Integration of Social and Natural Dimensions of Sustainability (LUCID) , Lund , Sweden
2Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1068/a35289

Angelsen A., 2012, Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices

Angelsen A., 2008, Moving ahead with REDD: Issues, options and implications, 11

Bertzky M., 2010, Carbon, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Exploring co-benefits—Ecuador

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003

10.1002/9780470693674

10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.004

Bucheli F. J., 2010, Ecuador—Land tenure and natural disasters

Chíu M., 2011, National programme document Ecuador

Coral A., 2011, Metodología de Monitoreo para las Áreas Bajo Conservación de Socio Bosque

10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.010

10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008

10.1038/387253a0

Costenbader J., 2009, Legal frameworks for REDD

10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.007

Dobson A., 1998, Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice, 10.1093/0198294956.001.0001

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

Garzón B. R., 2009, REDD en Territorios Indígenas de la Cuenca Amazonica. Seran los pueblos indígenas los directos beneficiarios?

INEC . 2010a . Ecuador en Cifras—Extensión Territorial. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/extension.html#tpi=281

INEC . 2010b . Ecuador en Cifras—Densidad. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/extension.html#tpi=282

INEC . 2010c . Ecuador en Cifras—Pobreza Necesidades Básicas Insatisfechas. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. http://www.ecuadorencifras.com/cifras-inec/pobrezaNbi.html

2009, Tropical forest tenure assessment. Trends, challenges and opportunities

10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00862-1

10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00194-9

Konow J., 2003, J. Econ. Literature, 52

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003

Leimona B., 2009, Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia, 3

Luttrell C., 2012, Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, 129

10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.01.005

Martinez-Alier J., 2002, A report for UNRISD, 1

2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis

2008, Acuerdo N°177

2012, Manual operativo unificado del Proyecto Socio Bosque

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006

10.1073/pnas.0707823105

2010, El dilemma de los bosques en el Ecuador

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004

10.1126/science.1196431

Peskett , L. 2011 .Benefit sharing in REDD+: Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington, DC: World Bank and REDD-net. http://redd-net.org/files/BenefitSharingReport.pdf (accessed 16 May 2012).

Peskett , L. , and G. Brodnig . 2011 .Carbon rights in REDD+. Exploring the implications for poor and vulnerable people. Washington, DC: World Bank and REDD-net. http://redd-net.org/files/CarbonRightsReport.pdf (accessed 16 May 2012).

Proctor , W. , T. Köllner , and A. Lukasiewicz . 2008 .Equity considerations and payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Economy and Policy Research—Discussion Paper Series. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. http://www.landecon.cam.ac.uk/RePEc/pdf/200831.pdf (accessed 15 May 2012).

2011, Resultados globales 2011

10.3390/f2020525

2008, Constitución de 2008

Rosa H., 2004, Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: Lessons from the Americas

Scherr S., 2004, For services rendered—The current status and future potential of markets for the ecosystem services provided by tropical forests

Schokkaert , E. 1998 . Mr. Fairmind is post-welfarist: Opinions on distributive justice. Catholic University of Leuven, Department of Economics, Discussion paper series (98.09). Leuven, Belgium.

10.1007/s00355-003-0257-3

2009, Plan Nacional del Desarollo

10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00006-3

Skutsch M., 2008, Energy Environ., 19, 14, 10.1260/095830508785363622

Stern , M. , and B. S. Kernan . 2011 .Report on biodiversity and tropical forests in Ecuador. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). http://transition.usaid.gov/locations/latin_america_caribbean/environment/docs/section_118/Ecuador_May_2011.pdf (accessed 16 April 2012).

10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.006

ARD T. T., 2012, Forest Carbon, Markets and Communities (FCMC) program. Key findings and opportunities for REDD+ in Ecuador

van Noordwijk M., 2010, Ecol. Society, 15, 17, 10.5751/ES-03664-150417

Vatn , A. , D. N. Barton , H. Lindhjem , S. Movik , I. Ring , and R. Santos . 2011 .Can markets protect biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. NORAGRIC Report No. 60. Aas, Norway: Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) .