The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: A case study of two Indonesian PES schemes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, 2002, The rhino's horn: Incomplete property rights and the optimal value of an asset, Journal of Legal Studies, 30, 339, 10.1086/340411
Alpizar, F., Madrigal, R., 2008. Constructing payment systems for ecological services at the local level. In: Conference Paper on Methodological Approach and Some Lessons Learned. Economics and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue.
Alston, L.J., Anderson, K., Smith, S.M., 2013. Payment for Environmental Services: Hypotheses and Evidence. NBER Working Paper Series 18740. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Antle, 2009, Payment for environmental services, poverty and sustainability: the case of agricultural soil carbon sequestration, 133
Arifin, B., 2005. Institutional Constraints and Opportunities in Developing Environmental Service Market: Lessons from Institutional Studies on RUPES in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)-SEA Office, Bogor, Indonesia.
Budhi, 2008, Concept and implementation of PES program in the Cidanau watershed: a lesson learned for future environmental policy, Journal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian (Journal of Agricultural Policy), 6, 37
Corbera, 2009, Institutional dimensions of payment for environmental services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme, Ecological Economics, 68, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008
Demsetz, 1967, Toward a theory of property rights, American Economic Review, 57, 347
Farley, 2010, Payment for ecosystem services: from local to global, Ecological Economics, 69, 2060, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010
2009
Indonesian Central Statistic Agency, 2012. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, BPS Publishing, Jakarta, Indonesia
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), 2011. Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam: An Analysis of the Pilot Project in Lam Dong Province. Forest Conservation Project Occasional Paper No. 5. IGES, Japan.
International Crisis Group (ICG), 2001. Indonesia: Natural Resources and Law Enforcement. Asia Report Number 29. Jakarta, Brussels.
Jindal, R., Kerr, J., 2007. Transaction Costs. USAID PES Brief 3.4.
Kaplowitz, 2008, Payment for environmental services and other institutions for protecting drinking water in eastern Costa Rica, 380
Khatri, D.B., 2009. Compromising the Environment in Payments for Environmental Services? An Institutional Analysis of Mechanisms for Sharing Hydroelectricity Revenue in the Kulekhani Watershed, Nepal. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Development Studies, The Hague, Netherlands.
Klein, 2000, New institutional economics, 456
Kosoy, 2010, Payment for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
Leffler, 1991, Transaction costs and the efficient organization of production: a study of timber-harvesting contracts, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 1060, 10.1086/261789
Leitmann, 2009
2009
May, 2004, Using fiscal instruments to encourage conservation: municipal responses to the “ecological” value-added tax in Parana and Minas Gerais, Brazil, 173
Mayrand, 2004
2005
Paavola, J., Adger, W.N., 2006. New Institutional Economics and the Environment: Conceptual Foundations and Policy Implications. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 02-06.
2004
Pender, J., Suyanto, S., Kerr, J., Kato, E., 2008. Impacts of the hutan kemasyarakatan Social Forestry Program in the Sumberjaya Watershed, West Lampung District of Sumatra, Indonesia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00769. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
Pirard, 2012, Payment for Environmental Services (PES) in the public policy landscape:“mandatory” spices in the Indonesia recipe, Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 23, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.002
Prasetyo, 2009, Making policy work for payment for environmental services (PES): an evaluation of the experience of formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28, 415, 10.1080/10549810902791531
Ruhweza, A., Masiga, M., 2007. Institutions for payments for environmental services; challenges and opportunities in Uganda. Prepared for the Ninth Annual BIOECON Conference on “Economics and Institutions for Biodiversity Conservation.” Kings College, Cambridge, pp. 19–21.
Suyanto, S., Leimona, B., Permana, R.P., Chandler, F.J.C., 2005. Review of the Development of Environmental Services Market in Indonesia. World AgroForestry Centre (ICRAF) South East Asia Office, Bogor, Indonesia.
Umbeck, 1977, The California gold rush: a study of emerging property rights, Explorations in Economic History, 14, 197, 10.1016/0014-4983(77)90006-7
Vatn, 2009, An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal, Ecological Economics, 68, 2207, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005
Vatn, 2010, An instituional analysis of payment for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
Wendland, 2010, Rewards for environmental services and collective land tenure: lessons from Ecuador and Indonesia, Mountain Forum Bulletin, 19
Williamson, 1996
Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
Wunder, S., 2008. Necessary Condition for Ecosystem Service Payment. Conference Paper, Economic and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue.
Yeager, C., 2008. Conservation of Tropical Forests and Biological Diversity in Indonesia. Report Submitted to USAID, Indonesia.