Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications

Barreto, 1998, Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia, Forest Ecology and Management, 108, 9, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00251-X

Barreto, 2008

Benatti, 2006

Börner, 2008, Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: from cost assessment to scheme design, International Forestry Review, 10, 496, 10.1505/ifor.10.3.496

Börner, 2007, Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: interrelationships and policy prescriptions, Ecological Economics, 64, 356, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.001

Chomitz, 2001

Chomitz, 2006

Claassen, 2008, Cost-effective design of agri-environmental programs: US experience in theory and practice., Ecological Economics, 65, 737, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032

Dutschke, 2003

Dutschke, 2008, Financing REDD: linking country needs and financing sources, CIFOR Infobrief, 17, 1

Ferraro, 2008, Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029

Ferraro, 2002, Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 1718, 10.1126/science.1078104

Ferreira, 2005, O desmatamento na Amazônia e a importância das áreas protegidas, Estudos Avançados, 19, 10.1590/S0103-40142005000100010

2007

Hamilton, 2008

Holmes, 2004

IBAMA, 2007. GIS data provided by the Brazilian Institute for Environment at: http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/shapes/.

INCRA, 2007. GIS data from the National Agrarian Reform Institute provided by the Brazilian Institute for Environment at: http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/shapes/.

Malhi, 2008, Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon, Science, 319, 169, 10.1126/science.1146961

Margulis, 2004

Muradian, 2010, Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Conceptual Framework for Understanding Payments for Environmental Services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1202, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006

Nepstad, 2006, Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands, Conservation Biology, 20, 65, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00351.x

Nepstad, 2007, The costs and benefits of reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon

Norgaard, 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 1219, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009

Pagiola, 2008, Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica, Ecological Economics, 65, 712, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033

Pascual, 2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach, Ecological Economics, 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004

Pedlowski, 2005, Conservation units: a new deforestation frontier in the Amazonian state of Rondônia, Brazil, Environmental Conservation, 32, 149, 10.1017/S0376892905002134

Saatchi, 2007, Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin, Global Change Biology, 13, 816, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01323.x

Soares-Filho, 2006, Modeling conservation in the Amazon basin, Nature, 440, 520, 10.1038/nature04389

Swallow, 2007, Opportunities for avoided deforestation with sustainable benefits

Turner, 2007, Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Bioscience, 57, 868, 10.1641/B571009

Vatn, 2010, An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018

Vosti, 2002

Wunder, 2005

Wunder, 2008, Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence, Environment and Development Economics, 13, 279, 10.1017/S1355770X08004282

Wunder, 2008, Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries, Ecological Economics, 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010

Wünscher, 2008, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits, Ecological Economics, 65, 822, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014