Intermediary roles and payments for ecosystem services: A typology and program feasibility application in Panama

Ecosystem Services - Tập 6 - Trang 104-116 - 2013
Heidi Huber‐Stearns1, Joshua Goldstein1, Esther Duke1
1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, 1480 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal, 2001, Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources, World Development, 29, 1649, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8

Balvanera, 2012, Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art, Ecosystem Services, 2, 56, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006

Bracer, C., Scherr, S., Molnar, A., Sekher, M., Ochieng, B.O., Sriskanthan, G., 2007. Organization and Governance for Fostering Pro-Poor Compensation for Environmental Services: CES Scoping Study Issue Paper 4. World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF Working Paper 39.

Brouwer, 2011, Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services, Environmental Conservation, 38, 380, 10.1017/S0376892911000543

2012

Cash, 2003, Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14, 10.1073/pnas.1231332100

Clark, 2006, Innovation and appraisal of sustainability efforts in La Amistad, Bocas del Toro, Panama and Talamanca, Costa Rica Region—a synthesis, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 22, 183, 10.1300/J091v22n01_10

Corbera, 2007, Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso America, Global Environmental Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005

Corbera, 2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystems services, Development and Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x

Corbera, 2009, Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programmes, Ecological Economics, 68, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008

Daniels, 2010, Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica's PES: are we asking the right questions?, Ecological Economics, 69, 2116, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.011

Duke, 2010

Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

Glesne, 2011

Howells, 2006, Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy, 35, 715, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005

Jack, 2008, Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 150, 9465, 10.1073/pnas.0705503104

Kemkes, 2010, Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision, Ecological Economics, 69, 2069, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.032

Leimona, B., Lee, E., 2008. Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Services: Some Considerations. January Brief. World Agroforestry Centre, and Bangkok, Thailand. Regional Community Forestry Training Centre, Indonesia.

Locatelli, 2008, Impacts of payments for environmental services on local development in northern Costa Rica: a fuzzy multi-criteria analysis, Forest Policy and Economics, 10, 275, 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.11.007

Mike, 2008

Milder, 2010, Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries, Ecology and Society, 15, 4, 10.5751/ES-03098-150204

Moss, 2009, Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition, Environment and Planning, 41, 1480, 10.1068/a4116

Moss, 2009, Organizing water: the hidden role of intermediary work, Water Alternatives, 2, 16

Muñoz Escobar, 2013, Institutional durability of payments for watershed ecosystem services: lessons from two case studies from Columbia and Germany, Ecosystem Serv., 6, 104

Muradian, 2013, Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions, Conservation Letters, 6, 274, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x

Oestreicher, 2009, Avoiding deforestation in Panamanian protected areas: an analysis of protection effectiveness and implications for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, Global Environmental Change, 19, 279, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.003

Ostrom, E., 1999. Self-Governance and Forest Resources. CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 20, pp. 1–11.

Pagiola, 2005, Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America, World Development, 33, 237, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011

Pascual, 2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach, Ecological Economics, 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004

Patton, 2002

Peskett, 2011, Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda, Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 216, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.004

Pham, 2010, Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam, Environmental Conservation, 37, 64, 10.1017/S037689291000024X

Redford, 2009, Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature, Conservation Biology, 23, 785, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x

Rosa, 2004, Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas, International Forestry Review, 6, 187, 10.1505/ifor.6.2.187.38401

Sternlieb, 2013, A question of fit: reflections on boundaries, organizations, and social–ecological systems, Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 117, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.053

Swallow, 2009, Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison, Ecology and Society, 14, 26, 10.5751/ES-02499-140226

Tacconi, 2012, Redefining payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 73, 29, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028

The Nature Conservancy, 2007

van Noordwijk, 2010, Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: payments, compensation, or co-investment?, Ecology and Society, 15, 17, 10.5751/ES-03664-150417

van Noordwijk, M., Leimona, B., Emerton, L., Tomich, T., Velarde, S., Kallesoe, M., Sekher, M., Swallow, B., 2007. Criteria and Indicators for Environmental Service Compensation and Reward Mechanisms: Realistic, Voluntary, Conditional And Pro-Poor. CES Scoping Study Issue Paper no. 2. ICRAF Working Paper, 37. World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi, Kenya.

Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018

Wunder, 2006, Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?, Ecology and Society, 11, 23, 10.5751/ES-01831-110223

Wunder, 2009, 1