Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes

Land Use Policy - Tập 31 - Trang 38-47 - 2013
Sango Mahanty1, Helen Suich1, Luca Tacconi1
1Crawford School of Economics and Government, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

2009 Angelsen, 2009 Bartels, 2010, Diversifying livelihood systems, strengthening social networks, and rewarding environmental stewardship among small-scale producers in the Brazilian Amazon: lessons from Proambiente, 82 Bebbington, 1999, Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty, World Dev., 27, 2021, 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7 Chambers, 1991 Clements, 2010, Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1283, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010 Corbera, 2010, Mexico's PES-carbon programme: a preliminary assessment and impacts on rural livelihoods, 54 Corbera, 2010, Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon, Environ. Plann. A, 42, 1739, 10.1068/a42437 Corbera, 2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services, Dev. Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x Corbera, 2007, The equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America, Global Environ. Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005 Cotula, 2009 Dev, 2007, Community forestry in the Nepal hills: practice and livelihood impacts, I, 142 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2006 German, 2010, Social and environmental footprints of carbon payments: a case study from Uganda, 160 Gerring, 2004, What is a case study and what is it good for?, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 98, 341, 10.1017/S0003055404001182 Gomez-Baggethun, 2010, The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Grieg-Gran, 2005, How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 1511, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002 Griffiths, T. 2007. Seeing ‘RED’? ‘Avoided deforestation’ and the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh. Hobley, 2007 Jindal, 2008, Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: potential benefits and challenges, Nat. Resour. Forum, 32, 116, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00176.x Jindal, 2010, Livelihood impacts of payments for forest carbon services: field evidence from Mozambique, 185 Landell-Mills, 2002 Lansing, 2011, Realizing carbon's value: discourse and calculation in the production of carbon forestry offsets in Costa Rica, Antipode, 43, 731, 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00886.x Larson, 2011, Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+, Global Environ. Change, 21, 540, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.008 Leimona, 2010, The livelihood impacts of incentive payments for watershed management in Cidanau watershed, West Java, Indonesia, 106 Mahanty, 2009, A fair share? Sharing the benefits and costs of collaborative forest management, Int. For. Rev., 11, 268 McAfee, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 100, 1, 10.1080/00045601003794833 Paavola, 2005, Institutional ecological economics, Ecol. Econ., 53, 353, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.017 Pagiola, 2008, Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica, Ecol. Econ., 65, 712, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033 Pagiola, 2005, Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 237, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011 Pagiola, 2008, Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 299, 10.1017/S1355770X08004270 Pascual, 2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004 Peskett, 2009, When REDD+ goes national: a review of realities, opportunities and challenges, 25 Peskett, 2011, Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 216, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.004 Phelps, 2010, Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?, Science, 328, 312, 10.1126/science.1187774 Pfaff, 2007, Will buying tropical forest carbon benefit the poor? Evidence from Costa Rica, Landuse Policy, 24, 600, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.01.003 Rios, 2010, Poor household participation in payments for environmental services in Nicaragua and Colombia, 212 Schlager, 1992, Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis, Land Econ., 68, 249, 10.2307/3146375 Scoones, 1998 Seymour, 2010, Governing sustainable forest management in the new climate regime, Clim. Change, 1, 803, 10.1002/wcc.70 Sikor, 2010, REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance, Global Environ. Change, 20, 423, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.007 Somerville, 2010, The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: a case study from Menabe, Madagascar, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1262, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.005 Soriaga, 2010, The ‘No-Fire Bonus’ Scheme in Mountain Province, Cordillera Administrative Region, Philippines, 130 Sunderlin, 2005, Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview, World Dev., 33, 1383, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 Sunderlin, 2008, Why forests are important for global poverty alleviation: a spatial explanation, Ecol. Society, 13, 24, 10.5751/ES-02590-130224 Sunderlin, 2009, Forest tenure rights and REDD+: from inertia to policy solutions, 139 Tacconi, L. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ., in press. Tacconi, 1995, Biodiversity conservation: the process of economic assessment and establishment of a protected area in Vanuatu, Dev. Change, 26, 89, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00544.x 2010 Takacs, 2010, Forest carbon offsets and international law: a deep equity legal analysis, Georgetown Int. Environ. Law Rev., 521, 1 Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 60, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 Von Benda-Beckmann, 2006, The properties of property, 1 Wunder, 2005 Wunder, 2007, The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation, Conserv. Biol., 21, 48, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x Wunder, 2008, Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 279, 10.1017/S1355770X08004282 Wunder, 2009, Can payments for environmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation?, 213 Yin, 2009 Zilberman, 2007, When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor?, Environ. Dev. Econ., 13, 255, 10.1017/S1355770X08004294