Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits

Land Use Policy - Tập 31 - Trang 90-98 - 2013
Stewart Lockie1
1School of Sociology, Haydon-Allen Building, 22, Room, 2190, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bardsely, 2002, New directions in environmental policy, Agenda, 9, 211 Bjornlund, 2003, Farmer participation in markets for temporary and permanent water in southeastern Australia, Agricultural Water Management, 63, 57, 10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00091-X Börner, 2010, Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: scope and equity implications, Ecological Economics, 69, 1272, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003 Bromley, 1989, Entitlements, missing markets, and environmental uncertainty, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 181, 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90031-4 Bromley, 1997, Rethinking markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5, 1383, 10.2307/1244351 Bromley, 2007, Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: moving beyond ‘market failure’, Ecological Economics, 63, 676, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.008 Bromley, 1990, Private property rights and presumptive policy entitlements: reconsidering the premises of rural policy, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 17, 197, 10.1093/erae/17.2.197 Clements, 2010, Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison or three programs in Cambodia, Ecological Economics, 69, 1283, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010 Commonwealth Treasury, no date. Public good conservation and the impact of environmental measures imposed on landholders. Treasury Economic Roundup Centenary Edition, pp. 93–103. Courtney, P. Socio-economic impacts and benefits of agri-environment schemes in England. Land Use Policy, forthcoming. Dargusch, 2008, Introduction to special issue: a typology of environmental markets, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 15, 70, 10.1080/14486563.2008.9725186 Drechsler, 2011, Conserving biodiversity with tradable permits under changing conservation costs and habitat restoration timelages, Ecological Economics, 70, 533, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.004 Earl, 2010, Towards a duty of care for biodiversity, Environmental Management, 45, 682, 10.1007/s00267-010-9444-z Engel, 2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 Engel, 2008, Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: the case of Indonesia, Ecological Economics, 65, 799, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.028 Ferraro, 2008, Assymetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 65, 810, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029 Gong, 2010, Participation in the world/s first Clean Development Mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules, Ecological Economics, 69, 1292, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.017 Gómez-Baggethun, 2010, The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 1209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 Hartig, 2009, Smart spatial incentives for market-based conservation, Biological Conservation, 142, 779, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.014 Hatanaka, 2008, Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: an objective or socially mediated governance mechanism?, Sociologia Ruralis, 48, 73, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00453.x Henderson, 2008, Experiences with market-based instruments for environmental policy, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 15, 113, 10.1080/14486563.2008.9725191 Hoang, M.H. Can REDD payment alone protect the forest? Land Use Policy, forthcoming. Kosoy, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002 Kroeger, 2007, An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands, Ecological Economics, 64, 321, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.021 Lockie, 2006, Networks of agri-environmental action: temporality, spatiality and identity within agricultural environments, Sociologia Ruralis, 46, 22, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00400.x Lockie, 2009, Agricultural biodiversity and neoliberal regimes of agri-environmental governance in Australia, Current Sociology, 57, 407, 10.1177/0011392108101590 Lockie, 2010, Neoliberal regimes of environmental governance: climate change, biodiversity and agriculture in Australia Lockie, 2007, Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance, Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 1, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.011 Lockie, 2010, Market instruments and collective obligations for on-farm biodiversity conservation, 287 Matthews, 2009, Fostering creativity and innovation in cooperative federalism: the uncertainty and risk dimensions, 59 Muradian, 2010, Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1202, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006 Mutersbaugh, 2010, Environmental certification: standardization for diversity, 155 NMBIWG (National Market Based Instruments Working Group), 2005 Norgaard, 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 1219, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 Omer, 2010, The contribution of biodiversity to modern intensive farming systems, 117 Pascual, 2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach, Ecological Economics, 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004 Reeve, 1997, Property and participation: an institutional analysis of rural resource management and landcare in Australia, 83 Reeve, 2001, Property rights and natural resource management: tiptoeing round the slumbering dragon, 257 Ring, 2010, Biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation: what role can economic instruments play?, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 50, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.004 Scherr, 2010, Paying for biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes, 229 Scott, 1998, Market-based approaches for sustainability, 33 Sommerville, 2010, The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: a case study from Menabe, Madagascar, Ecological Economics, 69, 1262, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.005 Stone, 2010, Targeting payments for ecological services, 253 Swift, 2004, Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: are we asking the right questions?, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104, 113, 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013 Van Hecken, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view, Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 785, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006 Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 Whitten, 2005 Wunder, 2008, Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services in developed and developing countries, Ecological Economics, 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010 Wünscher, 2008, Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits, Ecological Economics, 65, 822, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.014 Zhang, 2007, Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 253, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024