Natural Capital and Sustainable Development

Conservation Biology - Tập 6 Số 1 - Trang 37-46 - 1992
Robert Costanza1, Herman E. Daly2,3
1Director, Maryland International Institute for Ecological Economics, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, University of Maryland, Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688, U.S.A.
2* The views presented here are those of the author and should in no way be attributed to the World Bank.
3Environment Department, The World Bank, 1818 H. Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Abstract: A minimum necessary condition for sustainability is the maintenance of the total natural capital stock at or above the current level. While a lower stock of natural capital may be sustainable, society can allow no further decline in natural capital given the large uncertainty and the dire consequences of guessing wrong. This “constancy of total natural capital” rule can thus be seen as a prudent minimum condition for assuring sustainability, to be relaxed only when solid evidence can be offered that it is safe to do so.We discuss methodological issues concerning the degree of substitutability of manufactured for natural capital, quantifying ecosystem services and natural capital, and the role of the discount rate in valuing natural capital. We differentiate the concepts of growth (material increase in size) and development (improvement in organization without size change). Given these definitions, growth cannot the sustainable indefinitely on a finite planet. Development may be sustainable, but even this aspect of change may have some limits. One problem is that current measures of economic well‐being at the macro level (i.e., the Gross National Product) measure mainly growth, or at best conflate growth and development. This urgently requires revision.Finally, we suggest some principles of sustainable development and describe why maintaining natural capital stocks is a prudent and achievable policy for insuring sustainable development. There is disagreement between technological optimists (who see technical progress as eliminating all resource constraints to growth and development) and technological skeptics (who do not see as much scope for this approach and fear irreversible use of resources and damage to natural capital). By maintaining natural capital stocks (preferably by using a natural capital depletion tax), we can satisfy both the skeptics (since resources will be conserved for future generations) and the optimists (since this will raise the price of natural capital depletion and more rapidly induce the technical change they predict).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmad Y. J. S.El Serafy andE.Lutz.1989.Environmental accounting for sustainable development.A UNEP—World Bank Symposium. The World Bank Washington D.C.

Arrow K. J., 1976, Energy and the environment: a risk benefit approach

10.1126/science.225.4665.890

10.1126/science.210.4475.1219

Costanza R., 1987, Social traps and environmental policy, Bio-Science, 37, 407

Costanza R., 1991, Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability, 525

Costanza R., 1991, Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability, 1

Costanza R., 1989, Ecological Economics, 335

10.1016/0921-8009(90)90013-K

Cross J. G., 1980, Social traps

10.1086/259412

Daly H. E., 1973, Toward a steady‐state economy

Daly H., 1977, Steady‐state economics: the political economy of bio‐physical equilibrium and moral growth

10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R

Daly H. E., 1989, For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future, 482

El Serafy S., 1989, A UNEP—World Bank Symposium. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 10

Farber S., 1987, The economic value of wetlands systems, Journal of Environmental Management, 24, 41

Georgescu‐Roegen N., 1981, Energy, economics, and the environment: conflicting views of an essential interrelationship, 43

Gever J., 1986, Beyond oil: the threat to food and fuel in the coming decades, 304

Hall C. A. S., 1986, Energy and resource quality: the ecology of the economic process, 577

Hannon B., 1985, Ecosystem, flow analysis, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 213, 97

10.1126/science.196.4297.1384

Lovins A. B., 1987, Energy: the avoidable oil crisis, The Atlantic, 22

MacNeil J.1990.Sustainable development economics and the growth imperative.Background Paper No. 3 Workshop on the Economics of Sustainable Development January 23. Washington D.C.

Nordhaus W., 1972, Is growth obsolete?

Page T.1977.Conservation and economic efficiency: an approach to materials policy.Resources for the Future Washington D.C.266pp.

10.56021/9780801839863

Pezzey J.1989.Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development.Environment department working paper No. 15. The World Bank Washington D.C.

Platt J.1983.Social traps. American Psychologist28:642–651.

Randall A., 1987, Resource economics

Scott A. D., 1955, Natural resources: the economics of conservation

WCED, 1987, Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Biology

Tập 6 Số 1

37-46

Thông tin tác giả