Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance

Contemporary Educational Psychology - Tập 33 - Trang 561-583 - 2008
Corwin Senko1, Kenneth M. Miles2
1State University of New York—New Paltz, Psychology Department, 600 Hawk Drive, New Paltz, NY 12561, USA
2Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 6161, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bodmann, S. M., Schrager, S. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2007). The 2×2 model of achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Poster presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Elliot, 2005, A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct, 52

Entwistle, 1988, Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning, 21

Fletcher, T. D., Selgrade, K. A., & Germano, L. M. (submitted for publication). On the use of partial covariances in structural equation modeling: A method for using control variables.

Jetton, 1997, Instructional importance: What teachers value and what students learn, Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 290, 10.1598/RRQ.32.3.4

Linnenbrink, 2000, Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition, 196

Pintrich, 1989, The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom, Vol. 6, 117

Rogers, 1994

Senko, 2007, Historical perspectives and new directions in achievement goal theory: Understanding the effects of mastery and performance-approach goals

Urdan, 1997, Achievement goal theory: Past results, future directions, 99