The role of importance and interest in the processing of text
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving issues and emerging concerns.Educ. Psychol. 27: 33–51.
Alexander, P. A. (in press). Phases and stages of learning: The dynamics of domain knowledge, strategy knowledge, and motivation. In Weinstein C. E., and McCombs, B. L. (eds.),Strategic Learning: Skill, Will, and Self-Regulation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Alexander, P. A., and Knight, S. L. (1993). Dimensions of the interplay between learning and teaching.Educ. Forum 57: 232–245.
Alexander, P. A., and Kulikowich, J. M. (1994). Learning from physics text: A synthesis of recent research.J. Res. Sci. Teaching (Special Issue on Print Based Language Arts and Science Learning) 31: 895–911.
Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., and Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge.Rev. Educ. Res. 61: 315–343.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., and Schulze, S. K. (1994a). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest.Am. Educ. Res. J. 31: 313–337.
Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., Kulikowich, J. M., and Woehler, C. (1994b). Contrasting instructional and structural importance: The seductive effects of teacher questions.J. Reading Behav. 26: 19–45.
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., and Jetton, T. J. (1994c). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts.Rev. Educ. Res. 64: 201–252.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Duhon, K. E., Parker, D., and Woods, B. S. (April, 1995b).A Developmental Study of Domain Learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., and Kulikowich, J. M. (1995c). Interrelationship of Knowledge, Interest, and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., and Woods, B. S. (April, 1995a). Of squalls and fathoms: Navigating the seas of educational innovation. In Rosenshine, B. (Chair), Why Innovations Come and Go (Mostly Go)? Invited symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Alvermann, D. E., and Hayes, D. A. (1989). Classroom discussion of content area reading assignments: An intervention study.Reading Res. Quart. 24: 305–335.
Anderson, R. C., and Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective.J. Verb. Learning Verb. Behav. 17: 1–12.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., and Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse.Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 367–381.
Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L., Wilson, P. T., and Fielding, I. G. (1986). Interestingness of children's reading material. In Snow, R. E., and Farr, M. J. (eds.),Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction: Vol. 3. Cognitive and Affective Process Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 287–299.
Anderson, T. H., and Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Content area textbooks. In Anderson, R. C., Osborn, J., and Tierney R. J. (eds.), Learning to Read in American Schools, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 193–224.
Baumann, J. F. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension.Reading Res. Quart. 20: 93–115.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Omanson, R. C., and Pople, M. T. (1984). Improving the comprehensibility of stories: The effects of revisions that improve coherence.Reading Res. Quart. 19: 263–277.
Benton, S. L., Corkill, A. J., Sharp, J., Downey, R., and Khramtsova, I. (1995). Knowledge, interest, and narrative writing.J. Educ. Psychol. 87: 66–79.
Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1972). The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognit. Psychol. 2: 331–350.
Brewer, W. F., and Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In Long, L. and Baddeley, A. (eds.). Attention and Performance (Vol. 9), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 363–379.
Brewer, W. F., and Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories.J. Pragmat. 6: 473–486.
Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Gulgoz, S., and Glynn, S. M. (1989). Instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams: Revisions and retention improvements.J. Educa. Psychol. 81: 226–239.
Brown, A. L., and Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development.Child Devel. 48: 1–8.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 43–70.
diSessa, A. A. (1988). What will it mean to be “educated” in 2020? In Nickerson, R. S., and Zodhiates, P. P. (eds.),Technology in Education: Looking Toward 2020, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 43–66.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Rev. Educ. Res. 61: 239–264.
Garner, R. (1990). When children and adult's do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings.Rev. Educ. Res. 60: 517–529.
Garner, R., Alexander, P. A., Gillingham, M. G., Kulikowich, J. M., and Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text.Am. Educ. Res. J. 28: 643–659.
Garner, R., and Gillingham, M. G. (1992). Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A microanalysis.J. Exp. Educ. 59: 310–319.
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., and White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children.Cognit. Instr. 6: 41–57.
Garner, R., Brown, R., Sanders, S., and Menke, D. J. (1992). “Seductive details” and learning from text. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 239–254.
Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., and Radin, D. I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story.J. Educ. Psychol. 75: 500–510.
Goetz, E. T., Alexander, P. A., and Ash, M. J. (1992).Educational Psychology: A Classroom Perspective, Merrill, Columbus, OH.
Goodman, K. S., and Goodman, Y. M. (1979). Learning to read is natural. In Resnick, L. B., and Weaver, P. A. (eds.),Theory and Practice of Early Reading (Vol. 1), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 137–154.
Graves, M. F., and Slater, W. H. (April, 1989). Some Qualitative Assessments of Two Versions of a Passage from a High School History Textbook. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Graves, M. F., Slater, W. H., Roen, D., Redd-Boyd, T., Duin, A. H., Furniss, D. W., and Hazeltine, P. (1988). Some characteristics of memorable expository writing: Effects of revisions by writers with different backgrounds.Res. Teaching Engl. 22: 242–265.
Hare, V. C., and Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills.Reading Res. Quart. 20: 62–78.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Rev. Educ. Res. 60: 549–571.
Hidi, S. (in press). A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text.Rev. Educ. Psychol.
Hidi, S., and Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 215–238.
Hidi, S., and Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—A neglected variable in discourse processing.Cognit. Sci. 10: 179–194.
Hidi, S., and Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts.Reading Res. Quart. 23: 465–482.
Hidi, S., Baird, W., and Hildyard, A. (1982). That's important, but is it interesting? Two factors in text processing. In Flammer A., and Kintsch, W. (eds.),Discourse Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 63–75.
Jetton, T. L. (1994). Teachers' and Students' Understanding of Scientific Exposition: How Importance and Interest Influence What Is Assessed and What Is Discussed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Education, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Jetton, T. L., and Alexander, P. A. (April, 1994). Instructional Importance: What Teachers Value and What Students Learn. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Jetton, T. L., and Alexander, P. A. (April, 1995). The Nature of Scientific Discourse: The Academic and Social Texts That Are Constructed Through the Discourse in a Science Classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Jetton, T. L., Alexander, P. A., and White, S. H. (December, 1992). Motivating from Without: The Effects of Including Personally Involving Information in Content-Area Texts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio.
Jose, P. E., and Brewer, W. F. (1990). Early grade schoolchildren's liking of script and suspense story structures.J. Reading Behav. 22: 355–372.
Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway?Poetics 9: 87–89.
Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.
Krapp, A., and Fink, B. (1992). The development and function of interests during the critical transition from home to preschool. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 397–429.
Lapan, R., and Reynolds, R. E. (1994). The selective attention strategy as a time-dependent phenomenon.Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 19: 379–398.
Mandl, H., Stein, N. L., and Trabasso, T. (1984).Learning and Comprehension of Text, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
McLaren, J., and Hidi, S. (1991). Text-Based Interest: Facilitative and Disruptive Effects. Unpublished manuscript.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).The Organization of Prose and Its Effect Upon Memory, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., and Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students.Reading Res. Quart., 16: 72–103.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom.J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 424–436.
Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., and Arter, J. L. (1978). Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research.Psychol. Bull. 85: 919–943.
Pearson, P. D., Gallagher, M. Y., Goudvis, A., and Johnston, P. (December, 1981). What Kinds of Expository Materials Occur in Elementary School Children's Textbooks? Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Dallas, TX.
Pichert, J. W., and Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story.J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 309–315.
Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: Future directions for research in Educational Psychology.Educ. Psychol. 29: 137–148.
Pintrich, P. R., and Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In Schunk, D., and Meece, J. (eds.),Student Perceptions in the Classroom, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149–183.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., and Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change.Rev. Educ. Res. 63: 167–199.
Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 361–395.
Renninger, K. A., and Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children.Dev. Psychol. 21: 624–632.
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (1992).The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., and Teasley, S. D. (eds.)Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–20.
Reynolds, R. E. (1992). Learning important information from text: The role of selective attention.Rev. Educ. Psychol. 4: 345–391.
Reynolds, R. E., and Schwartz, R. M. (1983). The relation of metaphoric processing to comprehension and memory.J. Educ. Psychol. 75: 450–459.
Reynolds, R. E., and Shirey, L. L. (1988). The role of attention in studying and learning. In Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., and Alexander, P. A. (eds.),Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 77–100.
Reynolds, R. E., Standiford, S. N., and Anderson, R. C. (1979). Distributions of reading time when questions are asked about a restricted category of text information.J. Educ. Psychol. 71: 183–190.
Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978).The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
Sadoski, M., and Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance.Reading Res. Quart. 25: 256–272.
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., and Kangiser, S. (1988). Imagination in story response: Relationships between imagery, affect, and structural importance.Reading Res. Quart. 23: 320–336.
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., and Fritz, J. B. (1993). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design.J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 1–15.
Schallert, D. L. (1982). The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In Otto, W., and White, S. (eds.),Reading Expository Material, Academic Press, New York, pp. 13–48.
Schallert, D. L., Alexander, P. A., and Goetz, E. T. (1988). Implicit instruction of strategies for learning from text. In Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., and Alexander, P. A. (eds.),Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 193–214.
Schiefele, U. (1992). Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 151–182.
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., and Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 183–211.
Schraw, G., and Dennison, R. S. (1994). The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall.J. Reading Behav. 26: 1–18.
Schraw, G., Wade, S. E., and Kardash, C. A. (1993). Interactive effects of text-based and task-based importance on learning from text.J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 652–661.
Schraw, G., Bruning, R., and Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest.J. Reading Behav. 27: 1–17.
Sewall, G. T. (1988). American history textbooks: Where do we go from here?Phi Delta Kappan 69: 552–558.
Shirey, L. L. (1992). Importance, interest, and selective attention. Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (Eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 281–296.
Spiro, R. J., and Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Nix, D., and Spiro, R. J. (eds.),Cognition, Education, and Multimedia, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 163–205.
Taylor, B. M., and Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text.Reading Res. Quart. 19: 134–146.
Wade, S. E. (1992). How interest affects learning from text. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 255–277.
Wade, S. E., and Adams, R. B. (1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text.J. Reading Behav. 4: 331–351.
Wade, S. E., and Schraw, G. (April, 1991). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on selective attention and recall. In Schallert, D. (Chair), Effects of Interest on Strategies and Learning from Text. Symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Wade, S. E., and Trathan, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning.J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 40–47.
Wade, S. E., Schraw, G., Buxton, W. M., and Hayes, M. T. (1993). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategies and recall.Reading Res. Quart. 28: 93–114.