Developing a barrier management framework for dealing with Natech domino effects and increasing chemical cluster resilience

Process Safety and Environmental Protection - Tập 168 - Trang 778-791 - 2022
Tao Zeng1,2,3, Guohua Chen1,2, Genserik Reniers3,4,5, Jinkun Men1,2
1Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
2Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China
3CEDON, KULeuven, Campus Brussels, Brussels 1000, Belgium
4Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Safety and Security Science Group (S3G), TU Delft, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
5Faculty of Applied Economics, Antwerp Research Group on Safety and Security (ARGoSS), University Antwerp, Antwerp, 2000, Belgium

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdolhamidzadeh, 2010, A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry, J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 416, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.049

Ahmad, 2013, A risk-based method for determining passive fire protection adequacy, Fire Saf. J., 58, 160, 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.01.020

Antonioni, 2007, A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events, J. Hazard. Mater., 147, 48, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.043

Arena, 2022, A novel decision support system for managing predictive maintenance strategies based on machine learning approaches, Saf. Sci., 146

Bernechea, 2013, A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 91, 423, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.09.004

Chen, 2020, A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries, Saf. Sci., 125

Chen, 2021, A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 215

Chen, 2021, Numerical investigation on performance of protective layer around large-scale chemical storage tank against impact by projectile, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 69, 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104351

Cincotta, 2019, Resilience-based optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects in process plants, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 58, 82, 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.02.004

Cozzani, 2021

Cozzani, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents, J. Hazard. Mater., 175, 501, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.033

Cozzani, 2014, Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 28, 10, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009

Darbra, 2010, Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences, J. Hazard. Mater., 183, 565, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.061

de Dianous, 2006, ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance, J. Hazard. Mater., 130, 220, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010

Gowland, 2006, The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?, J. Hazard. Mater., 130, 307, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.007

Hauge, S., Øien, K., 2016. Guidance for barrier management in the petroleum industry (Accessed in January 27, 2022). 〈https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/pds/reports/pds-report-guidance-for-barrier-management-in-the-petroleum-industry.pdf〉.

Hollnagel, 2008, Risk + barriers = safety?, Saf. Sci., 46, 221, 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028

Hosseinnia Davatgar, 2021, Safety barrier management: risk-based approach for the oil and gas sector, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9

Huang, 2020, An innovative quantitative analysis methodology for Natech events triggered by earthquakes in chemical tank farms, Saf. Sci., 128

IEC 61511, 2003

Janssens, 2015, A decision model to allocate protective safety barriers and mitigate domino effects, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 143, 44, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.022

Jia, 2017, Equipment vulnerability assessment (EVA) and pre-control of domino effects using a five-level hierarchical framework (FLHF), J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 48, 260, 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.05.004

Johansen, 2015, Barrier management in the offshore oil and gas industry, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 34, 49, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.023

Jung, 2019, Plant layout and blast wall optimization with the consideration of operating conditions and potential explosions, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 132, 285, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.010

Kamil, 2019, Dynamic domino effect risk assessment using Petri-nets, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 124, 308, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.02.019

Khakzad, 2013, Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks, Risk Anal., 33, 292, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01854.x

Khakzad, 2017, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 167, 232, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.004

Khakzad, 2018, Cost-effective fire protection of chemical plants against domino effects, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 169, 412, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.007

Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., Ahmed, S., 2015. Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 98, pp. 116–47.

Krausmann, 2011, Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis, Nat. Hazards, 59, 285, 10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3

Krausmann, 2016

Landucci, 2012, Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 106, 200, 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.010

Landucci, 2015, Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 143, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.023

Landucci, 2017, Risk assessment of mitigated domino scenarios in process facilities, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 160, 37, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.023

de Lira-Flores, 2019, Optimal plant layout considering the safety instrumented system design for hazardous equipment, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 124, 97, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.01.021

Liu, 2020, Safety barriers: research advances and new thoughts on theory, engineering and management, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 67

Markowski, 2011, “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 89, 205, 10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005

Men, 2022, An event-driven probabilistic methodology for modeling the spatial-temporal evolution of natural hazard-induced domino chain in chemical industrial parks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 226, 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108723

Meng, 2018, Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 180, 111, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.026

Misuri, 2021, A paradigm shift in the assessment of Natech scenarios in chemical and process facilities, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 152, 338, 10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.018

Misuri, 2020, Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 64

Misuri, 2020, Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 193

Misuri, 2021, Assessment of safety barrier performance in the mitigation of domino scenarios caused by Natech events, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 205

Misuri, 2021, Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 212

Naderpour, 2018, Texas LPG fire: domino effects triggered by natural hazards, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 116, 354, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.008

Necci, 2013, A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 115, 91, 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.018

Necci, 2014, Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 127, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.02.005

Necci, 2016, Quantitative assessment of risk due to major accidents triggered by lightning, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 154, 60, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.009

Pitblado, 2016, Concepts for dynamic barrier management, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 43, 741, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.005

PSA – Petroleum Safety Authority Norway, 2013. Principles for barrier management in the petroleum industry (Accessed 27 January, 2022). 〈https://www.ptil.no/contentassets/11851dc03a84473e8299a2d80e656356/principles-for-barrier-management-in-the-petroleum-industry_2013.pdf〉.

Rana, 2010, Forced dispersion of LNG vapor with water curtain, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 23, 768, 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.08.008

Rathnayaka, 2011, SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 89, 75, 10.1016/j.psep.2010.12.002

Reniers, 2013

Reniers, 2018, The impact of nature on chemical industrial facilities: dealing with challenges for creating resilient chemical industrial parks, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 56, 378, 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.09.010

Ricci, 2021, A comprehensive analysis of the occurrence of Natech events in the process industry, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 147, 703, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.031

Salzano, 2003, Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 16, 403, 10.1016/S0950-4230(03)00052-4

Sklet, 2006, Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 19, 494, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004

Sun, 2017, Investigation on the approach of intercepting fragments generated by vessel explosion using barrier net, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 49, 989, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.10.012

Tugnoli, 2013, Managing domino effects from a design-based viewpoint, 246

Xie, 2018, Common Cause Failures and Cascading Failures in Technical Systems: Similarities, Differences and Barriers, 2401

Xie, 2021, Performance analysis of safety instrumented systems against cascading failures during prolonged demands, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 216

Yang, 2020, Vulnerability assessment of atmospheric storage tanks to floods based on logistic regression, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 196

Yoo, 2019, Designing an effective mitigation system based on the physical barrier for hazardous chemical leakage accidents, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 80, 370, 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.08.016

Yuan, 2022, Safety barriers in the chemical process industries: a state-of-the-art review on their classification, assessment, and management, Saf. Sci., 148

Zeng, 2021, Methodology for quantitative risk analysis of domino effects triggered by flood, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 147, 866, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.042

Zerrouki, 2015, Safety and risk analysis of an operational heater using bayesian network, J. Fail. Anal. Prev., 15, 657, 10.1007/s11668-015-9986-8

Zhou, 2018, A matrix-based modeling and analysis approach for fire-induced domino effects, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 116, 347, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.02.014

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Tập 168

778-791

Thông tin tác giả