Texas LPG fire: Domino effects triggered by natural hazards

Antonioni, 2009, Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94, 1442, 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.026 Bednarski, 2004, Identification of sensitivities in Bayesian networks, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 17, 327, 10.1016/j.engappai.2004.03.011 CCPS, 2000 CSB, 2008 Campedel, 2008, Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects, Risk Anal., 28, 1231, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01092.x Cozzani, 2005, The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis, J. Hazard. Mater., 127, 14, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.003 Cozzani, 2006, Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events, J. Hazard. Mater., 129, 1, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.012 Cozzani, 2014, Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 28, 10, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009 Cruz, 2008, Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities, Nat. Haz., 44, 213, 10.1007/s11069-007-9118-1 El Hajj, 2015, Development of generic bow-tie diagrams of accidental scenarios triggered by flooding of industrial facilities (Natech), J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 36, 72, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.05.003 Fleming, 2004, Database development and uncertainty treatment for estimating pipe failure rates and rupture frequencies, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 86, 227, 10.1016/j.ress.2004.01.013 Girgin, 2013, RAPID-N: Rapid natech risk assessment and mapping framework, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 26, 949, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.10.004 Girgin, 2016, Historical analysis of US onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 40, 578, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.008 Khakzad, 2018, Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: a Bayesian network approach, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 169, 403, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.016 Khakzad, 2013, Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks, Risk Anal., 33, 292, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01854.x Krausmann, 2012, Natech risk reduction in the European Union, J. Risk Res., 15, 1027, 10.1080/13669877.2012.666761 Krausmann, 2011, Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue, Nat. Haz. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 921, 10.5194/nhess-11-921-2011 Landucci, 2014, Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 132, 125, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.016 Lanzano, 2015, Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Na-Tech risk assessment, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 33, 159, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.12.006 Morino, 2011, Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 10.1029/2011GL048689 Naderpour, 2014, The explosion at institute: modeling and analyzing the situation awareness factor, Acc. Anal. Prevent., 73, 209, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.008 Naderpour, 2014, An intelligent situation awareness support system for safety-critical environments, Dec. Supp. Syst., 59, 325, 10.1016/j.dss.2014.01.004 Neapolitan, 2004 Necci, 2013, A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 115, 91, 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.018 Necci, 2016, Quantitative assessment of risk due to major accidents triggered by lightning, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 154, 60, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.009 OREDA, 2002 Ramírez-Camacho, 2017, Assessing the consequences of pipeline accidents to support land-use planning, Saf. Sci., 97, 34, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.021 Reniers, 2013 Renni, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by lightning, J. Hazard. Mater., 184, 42, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.118 Salzano, 2012, Introducing external hazard factors in quantitative risk analysis, Revista de Ingeniería, 50, 10.16924/revinge.37.8 Steinberg, 2004, When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999, Nat. Hazard. Rev., 5, 121, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121)