Methodology for quantitative risk analysis of domino effects triggered by flood

Abdolhamidzadeh, 2010, A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry, J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 416, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.049 Amin, 2019, A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 126, 366, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.04.015 Antonioni, 2007, A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events, J. Hazard. Mater., 147, 48, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.043 Antonioni, 2009, Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 22, 614, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.012 Antonioni, 2015, Quantitative assessment of risk due to NaTech scenarios caused by floods, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 142, 334, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.020 Bao, 2010, Numerical simulation of flow over three circular cylinders in equilateral arrangements at low Reynolds number by a second-order characteristic-based split finite element method, Comput. Fluids, 39, 882, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.01.002 Basco, 2017, The vulnerability of industrial equipment to tsunami, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 50, 301, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.009 Bernechea, 2013, A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 91, 423, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.09.004 BEVI, 2009. BEVI Reference Manual version 3.2. RVIM, Bilthoven. Biscarini, 2010, CFD modelling approach for dam break flow studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 705, 10.5194/hess-14-705-2010 Camila, 2019, Systematic literature review and qualitative meta-analysis of Natech research in the past four decades, Saf. Sci., 116, 58, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.033 Chakraborty, 2018, A study of accident investigation methodologies applied to the Natech events during the 2011 Great East Japan. Earthquake, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 51, 208, 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.003 Chen, 2018, An innovative methodology for quickly modeling the spatial-temporal evolution of domino accidents triggered by fire, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 54, 312, 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.04.012 Chen, 2020, Cost-benefit management of intentional domino effects in chemical industrial areas, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 134, 392, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.007 Chen, 2020, A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries, Saf. Sci., 125 Chen, 2021, Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: a systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS, J. Clean. Prod., 279 Chung, 2018, Structural flood damage and the efficacy of property-level flood protection, Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., 36, 471, 10.1108/IJBPA-09-2017-0040 Cozzani, 2005, The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis, J. Hazard. Mater., 127, 14, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.003 Cozzani, 2006, Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 19, 463, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.11.007 Cozzani, 2006, Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events, J. Hazard. Mater., 129, 1, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.012 Cozzani, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents, J. Hazard. Mater., 175, 501, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.033 Cozzani, 2014, Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 28, 10, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009 Cruz, 2009, Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 22, 59, 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.08.007 Dakkoune, 2018, Risk analysis of French chemical industry, Saf. Sci., 105, 77, 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.003 Ding, 2019, FSEM: an approach to model contribution of synergistic effect of fires for domino effects, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 189, 271, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.041 Ding, 2020, Combining uncertainty reasoning and deterministic modeling for risk analysis of fire-induced domino effects, Saf. Sci., 129 Ding, 2020, A novel approach for domino effects modeling and risk analysis based on synergistic effect and accident evidence, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 203 DNV GL, 2020 DNV GL, 2020 El Hajj, 2015, Development of generic bow-tie diagrams of accidental scenarios triggered by flooding of industrial facilities (Natech), J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 36, 72, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.05.003 Genc, 2019, Optimal training and test sets design for machine learning, Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 27, 1534, 10.3906/elk-1807-212 Girgin, 2019, Dealing with cascading multi-hazard risks in national risk assessment: the case of Natech accidents, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 35 Godoy, 2007, Performance of storage tanks in oil facilities damaged by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 21, 441, 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(441) Hotzy, 2018, Machine learning: an approach in identifying risk factors for Coercion compared to binary logistic regression, Front. Psychiatry, 9 Huang, 2020, An innovative quantitative analysis methodology for Natech events triggered by earthquakes in chemical tank farms, Saf. Sci., 128 Kabir, 2019, Earthquake-related Natech risk assessment using a Bayesian belief network model, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 15, 725, 10.1080/15732479.2019.1569070 Kamil, 2019, Dynamic domino effect risk assessment using Petri-nets, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 124, 308, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.02.019 Khakzad, 2015, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 138, 263, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.007 Khakzad, 2018, Which fire to extinguish first? A risk-informed approach to emergency response in oil terminals, Risk Anal., 38, 1444, 10.1111/risa.12946 Khakzad, 2017, Fragility assessment of chemical storage tanks subject to floods, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 111, 75, 10.1016/j.psep.2017.06.012 Khakzad, 2018, Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: a Bayesian network approach, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 169, 403, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.016 Khakzad, 2013, Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks, Risk Anal., 33, 292, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01854.x Khakzad, 2014, Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis, Risk Anal., 34, 1128, 10.1111/risa.12158 Khakzad, 2016, Vulnerability analysis of process plants subject to domino effects, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 154, 127, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.004 Khan, 1998, Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries, Process Saf. Prog., 17, 107, 10.1002/prs.680170207 Khan, 1998, DOMIFFECT (DOMIno eFFECT): user-friendly software for domino effect analysis, Environ. Model. Softw., 13, 163, 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00018-8 Khan, 2001, An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 14, 283, 10.1016/S0950-4230(00)00048-6 Khan, 2001, Risk analysis of a petrochemical industry using ORA (Optimal Risk Analysis) procedure, Process Saf. Prog., 20, 95, 10.1002/prs.680200207 Khan, 2015, Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 98, 116, 10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005 Landucci, 2009, The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire, Accid. Anal. Prev., 41, 1206, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.006 Landucci, 2012, Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 106, 200, 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.010 Landucci, 2014, Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 132, 125, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.016 Lanzano, 2013, Seismic vulnerability of natural gas pipelines, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 117, 73, 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.019 Misuri, 2019, Lessons learnt from the impact of hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 190 Misuri, 2020, Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 64 Nascimento, 2016, Management of risks in natural disasters: a systematic review of the literature on NATECH events, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 44, 347, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.10.003 Nasim, 2019, An investigation of water-flow pressure distribution on bridge piers under flood loading, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 15, 219, 10.1080/15732479.2018.1545792 Necci, 2014, Assessment of lightning impact frequency for process equipment, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 130, 95, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.001 Necci, 2016, Quantitative assessment of risk due to major accidents triggered by lightning, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 154, 60, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.009 Potter, 2001, Design synthesis knowledge and inductive machine learning, Ai Edam-Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 15, 233, 10.1017/S0890060401153047 Reniers, 2013 Renni, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by lightning, J. Hazard. Mater., 184, 42, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.118 Rymarczyk, 2019, Logistic regression for machine learning in process tomography, Sensors., 19 Scikit-learn, 2020 Spadoni, 2003, The new version of ARIPAR and the benefits given in assessing and managing major risks in industrialised areas, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 81, 19, 10.1205/095758203762851958 Steinberg, 2008, Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art, Nat. Hazards, 46, 143, 10.1007/s11069-007-9205-3 Vílchez, 2011, Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 24, 281, 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.01.005 Yang, 2018, The probability prediction method of domino effect triggered by lightning in chemical tank farm, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 116, 106, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.01.019 Yang, 2020, Vulnerability assessment of atmospheric storage tanks to floods based on logistic regression, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 196 Yuan, 2016, Domino effect analysis of dust explosions using Bayesian networks, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 100, 108, 10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.005 Zeng, 2020, A systematic literature review on safety research related to chemical industrial parks, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su12145753 Zeng, 2020, Developing an advanced dynamic risk analysis method for fire-related domino effects, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 134, 149, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.029 Zhang, 2016, Numerical study on the effect of shape modification to the flow around circular cylinders, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 152, 23, 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.02.008 Zhou, 2017, Petri-net based cascading effect analysis of vapor cloud explosions, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 48, 118, 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.04.017 Zhou, 2018, A matrix-based modeling and analysis approach for fire-induced domino effects, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 116, 347, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.02.014 Zhou, 2018, Modeling and analysis of vapour cloud explosions knock-on events by using a Petri-net approach, Saf. Sci., 108, 188, 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.019 Zhou, 2020, Probabilistic analysis of domino effects by using a matrix-based simulation approach, Risk Anal., 40, 1913, 10.1111/risa.13544