Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios

Reliability Engineering & System Safety - Tập 193 - Trang 106597 - 2020
Alessio Misuri1, Gabriele Landucci2, Valerio Cozzani1
1LISES – Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy
2Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, 56126, Pisa, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Krausmann, 2016 Krausmann, 2010, The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 23, 242, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.10.004 Rasmussen, 1995, Natural events and accidents with hazardous materials, J Hazard Mater, 40, 43, 10.1016/0304-3894(94)00079-V Steinberg, 2004, When natural and technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999, Nat Hazards Rev, 5, 121, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:3(121) 2018 Cruz, 2006, Emerging issues for Natech disaster risk management in Europe, J Risk Res, 9, 483, 10.1080/13669870600717657 Mahan, 2018, Managing the risk associated with severe wind and flood events in the chemical processing industries Munich Re Group. NatCatSERVICE relevant natural loss events worldwide 1980 – 2018. https://natcatservice.munichre.com/; 2018 [accessed May 14, 2019]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/; 2018 [Accessed May 14, 2019]. Trenberth, 2018, Hurricane Harvey links to ocean heat content and climate change adaptation, Earth's Futur, 6, 730, 10.1029/2018EF000825 Misuri, 2019, Lessons learnt from the impact of Hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 190, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106521 Antonioni, 2009, Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 1442, 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.026 Antonioni, 2015, Quantitative assessment of risk due to Natech scenarios caused by floods, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 142, 334, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.020 Cozzani, 2014, Quantitative assessment of domino and Natech scenarios in complex industrial areas, J Loss PrevProcInd, 28, 10, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009 Casson Moreno, 2019, Analysis of past accidents triggered by natural events in the chemical and process industry, Chem. Eng. Trans, 74, 1405 Cozzani, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents, J Hazard Mater, 175, 501, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.033 Krausmann, 2011, Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis, Nat Hazards, 59, 285, 10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3 Krausmann, 2013, Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry, Nat Hazards, 67, 811, 10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0 Necci, 2015, Assessment of domino effect: state of the art and research Needs, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 3, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.017 2001 2012 De Dianous, 2006, ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance, J Hazard Mater, 130, 220, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010 Andersen, 2004 Salvi, 2006, A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive, J Hazard Mater, 130, 187, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.034 Rausand, 2011 Paltrinieri, 2016 Bucelli, 2018, Integrated risk assessment for oil and gas installations in sensitive areas, Ocean Eng., 150, 377, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.035 Hollnagel, 2004 Hollnagel, 2008, Risk + barriers = safety?, Saf Sci, 46, 221, 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028 Landucci, 2016, Domino effect frequency assessment: the role of safety barriers, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 44, 706, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.006 Landucci, 2015, Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.023 Landucci, 2017, Risk assessment of mitigated domino scenarios in process facilities, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 160, 37, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.023 2013 Svenson, 1991, The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries, Risk Anal, 11, 499, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00635.x Reason, 1990 Reason, 1997 1996 1999 Dowell, 2002, Simplified risk analysis: layer of protection analysis (LOPA) Sklet, 2006, Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 19, 494, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004 Casson Moreno, 2018, Identification of critical safety barriers in biogas facilities, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 169, 81, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.013 Girgin, 2011, The Natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: aftermath and lessons learned, Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 11, 1129, 10.5194/nhess-11-1129-2011 2015 2018 Hokstad, 1998, Recommendations on the use of expert judgment in safety and reliability engineering studies. Two offshore case studies, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 61, 65, 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00084-7 Argenti, 2017, A study on the performance assessment of anti-terrorism physical protection systems in chemical plants, Saf Sci, 94, 181, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.022 Cooke, 2008, TU Delft expert judgment data base, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 93, 657, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.005 Hauptmanns, 2008, Availability analysis for a fixed wet sprinkler system, Fire Saf J, 43, 468, 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.03.002 2009 2003 Mannan, 2005 1998 2001 Necci, 2014, Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 127, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.02.005 Misuri, 2019, Risk-based vulnerability analysis of chemical facilities affected by flooding, Chem Eng Trans, 75 Campedel, 2008 2007 1997 Madonna, 2009, The human factor in risk assessment: methodological comparison between human reliability analysis techniques, Prev Today, 5, 67 Norrington, 2008, Modelling the reliability of search and rescue operations with Bayesian Belief Networks, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 93, 940, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.006 Jacobs, 1995, Methods for combining experts’ probability assessments, Neural Comput, 7, 867, 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.867 Cooke, 1999 Manikandan, 2011, Measures of central tendency: median and mode, J Pharmacol Pharmacother, 2, 214, 10.4103/0976-500X.83300 O'Hagan, 2006 Colson, 2018, Expert elicitation: using the classical model to validate experts’ judgments, Rev Environ Econ Policy, 12, 113, 10.1093/reep/rex022