Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events

Krausmann E., Cruz A.M., Salzano E. Natech risk assessment and management: reducing the risk of natural-hazard impact on hazardous installations. 2016. Krausmann, 2008, A qualitative Natech damage scale for the impact of floods on selected industrial facilities, Nat Hazards, 46, 179, 10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5 Krausmann, 2019, Natural hazard impacts on industry and critical infrastructure: Natech risk drivers and risk management performance indicators, Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101163 Salzano, 2013, Public awareness promoting new or emerging risks: industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards (NaTech), J Risk Res, 16, 469, 10.1080/13669877.2012.729529 Krausmann, 2013, Cruz AM. Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry, Nat Hazards, 67, 811, 10.1007/s11069-013-0607-0 Watanabe, 2015, Review of five investigation committees reports on the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant severe accident: focusing on accident progression and causes, J Nucl Sci Technol, 52, 41, 10.1080/00223131.2014.927808 Zama, 2012, On damage of oil storage tanks due to the 2011 off the pacific coast of tohoku earthquake ( mw 9.0 ), japan U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Organic peroxide decomposition, release, and fire at arkema crosby following hurricane harvey flooding. Crosby, TX: 2018. Misuri, 2019, Lessons learnt from the impact of hurricane Harvey on the chemical and process industry, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 190, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106521 Krausmann, 2010, The impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on industrial facilities, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 23, 242, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.10.004 Ricci, 2021, A Comprehensive Analysis of the Occurrence of Natech Events in the Chemical and Process Industry, Process Saf.Env. Prot., 147, 703, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.031 Krausmann, 2011, Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis, Nat Hazards, 59, 285, 10.1007/s11069-011-9754-3 Misuri, 2020, Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 193, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106597 Misuri, 2021, Assessment of safety barrier performance in the mitigation of domino scenarios caused by Natech events, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 205, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107278 Antonioni, 2009, Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 1442, 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.026 Cozzani, 2014, Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 28, 10, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.009 Antonioni, 2015, Quantitative assessment of risk due to NaTech scenarios caused by floods, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 142, 334, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.020 Campedel, 2008, Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects, Risk Anal, 28, 1231, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01092.x Antonioni, 2007, A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events, J Hazard Mater, 147, 48, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.043 Salzano, 2003, Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 16, 403, 10.1016/S0950-4230(03)00052-4 Moschonas, 2014, Investigation of seismic vulnerability of industrial pressure vessels. Second Eur, Conf. Earthq. Eng. Seismol. Instanbul Lanzano, 2015, Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Na-Tech risk assessment, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 33, 159, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.12.006 Olivar, 2020, The effects of extreme winds on atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 195, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106686 Zuluaga, 2019, Development of parametric fragility curves for storage tanks : a Natech approach, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 189, 1, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.008 Landucci, 2012, Release of hazardous substances in flood events : damage model for atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 106, 200, 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.010 Landucci, 2014, Release of hazardous substances in flood events: damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 132, 125, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.016 Yang, 2020, Vulnerability assessment of atmospheric storage tanks to floods based on logistic regression, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 196, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106721 Bernier, 2019, Fragility and risk assessment of aboveground storage tanks subjected to concurrent surge , wave , and wind loads, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 191, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106571 Kameshwar, 2018, Storm surge fragility assessment of above ground storage tanks, Struct Saf, 70, 48, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.10.002 Kameshwar, 2018, Fragility and Resilience Indicators for Portfolio of Oil Storage Tanks Subjected to Hurricanes, J Infrastruct Syst, 24, 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000418 Necci, 2013, A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 115, 91, 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.018 Necci, 2014, Assessment of lightning impact frequency for process equipment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 130, 95, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.001 Khakzad, 2018, Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: a Bayesian network approach, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 169, 403, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.016 Khakzad, 2017, Fragility assessment of chemical storage tanks subject to floods, Process Saf Environ Prot, 111, 75, 10.1016/j.psep.2017.06.012 Khakzad, 2019, Modeling wildfire spread in wildland-industrial interfaces using dynamic Bayesian network, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 189, 165, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.006 Necci, 2015, Assessment of domino effect: state of the art and research Needs, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 3, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.017 Reniers, 2013, Domino Effects in the Process Industries: modelling, Prevention and Managing, 1 Cozzani, 2006, Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 19, 463, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.11.007 Cozzani, 2005, The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis, J Hazard Mater, 127, 14, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.003 Landucci, 2017, Risk assessment of mitigated domino scenarios in process facilities, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 160, 37, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.023 Khakzad, 2013, Domino Effect Analysis Using Bayesian Networks, Risk Anal, 33, 292, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01854.x Khakzad, 2015, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 138, 263, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.007 Khakzad, 2015, Using graph theory to analyze the vulnerability of process plants in the context of cascading effects, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 63, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.015 Khakzad, 2017, Application of Graph Theory to Cost-Effective Fire Protection of Chemical Plants During Domino Effects, Risk Anal, 37, 1652, 10.1111/risa.12712 Naderpour, 2018, Texas LPG fire: domino effects triggered by natural hazards, Process Saf Environ Prot, 116, 354, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.008 Misuri, 2020, Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 64, 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104095 Zeng, 2021, Methodology for quantitative risk analysis of domino effects triggered by flood, Process Saf Environ Prot, 147, 866, 10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.042 Khakzad, 2020, Special issue: quantitative assessment and risk management of Natech accidents, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 203, 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107198 Duijm, 2009, Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 332, 10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.031 Janssens, 2015, A decision model to allocate protective safety barriers and mitigate domino effects, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 44, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.022 Khakzad, 2017, Cost-effective allocation of safety measures in chemical plants w.r.t land-use planning, Saf Sci, 97, 2, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.010 Khakzad, 2017, Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 167, 232, 10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.004 Fabbrocino, 2005, Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas, J Hazard Mater, 123, 61, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.015 Salzano, 2009, Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 1577, 10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.023 Baker J.W. An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA). White Pap Version 201 2013:79. de Moel, 2009, Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use, Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 9, 289, 10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009 Holmes R.R.J., Dinicola K. 100-Year Flood - It's All About Chance. US Geol Surv Gen Inf Prod 106 2010:1. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/106/pdf/100-year-flood_041210web.pdf (accessed January 15, 2021). Cozzani, 2010, Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents, J Hazard Mater, 175, 501, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.033 Cozzani, 2006, Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events, J Hazard Mater, 129, 1, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.012 Alileche, 2015, Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: a review of approaches and regulations, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 74, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.007 Cozzani, 2013, 9 - Threshold-Based Approach, 189 Campedel M. Analysis of major industrial accidents triggered by natural events reported in the principal available chemical accident databases. Luxembourg: 2008. Landucci, 2009, The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire, Accid Anal Prev, 41, 1206, 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.006 Landucci, 2015, Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 143, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.023 Landucci, 2016, Domino effect frequency assessment: the role of safety barriers, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 44, 706, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.006 Van Den Bosh, 2005 Lees’, 2005 2000 Sklet, 2006, Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 19, 494, 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004 Rausand, 2011 2013 2001 Delvosalle, 2006, ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries, J Hazard Mater, 130, 200, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.005 De Dianous, 2006, ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance, J Hazard Mater, 130, 220, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010 Hollnagel, 2007, Risk+barriers=safety?, Saf Sci, 46, 221, 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028 International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61511. functional safety: safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. 2003. Kumar, 1994, Proportional hazards model: a review, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 44, 177, 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90010-8 Gao, 2010, An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering Arctic influence factors, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 95, 837, 10.1016/j.ress.2010.03.011 Pitblado, 2011, Frequency data and modification factors used in QRA studies, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 24, 249, 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.09.009 Cox, 1972, Regression Models and Life-Tables, J R Stat Soc Ser B, 2, 187 Bendell, 1991, Applying proportional hazards modelling in reliability, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 34, 35, 10.1016/0951-8320(91)90098-R Landucci, 2017, A methodology for the analysis of domino and cascading events in Oil & Gas facilities operating in harsh environments, Saf Sci, 95, 182, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.019 Misuri, 2020, Assessment of safety barrier performance in Natech scenarios, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 193, 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106597 Necci, 2014, Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 127, 30, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.02.005 Uijt de Haag, 2005 Egidi, 1995, The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 49, 75, 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00026-X D.N.V. Det Norske Veritas. Offshore Reliability Data OREDA. Høvik, NO: DNV; 1997. Madonna, 2009, The human factor in risk assessment: methodological comparison between human reliability analysis techniques, Prev Today, 5, 67 New Zealand Fire Service Commission. Effectiveness of fire safety systems for use in quantitative risk assessments - Research Report 89. 2008. American, 2008 Cadwallader, 1995 Karagiannis G.M., Chondrogiannis S., Krausmann E., Turksever Z.I. Power grid recovery after natural hazard impact. 2017. Labib, 2015, Learning how to learn from failures: the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Eng Fail Anal, 47, 117, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.002 NFPA - National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 20 - Installation of stationary pumps for fire protection. Quincy (MA): 2007. IAEA- International Atomic Energy Agency. Defence in depth in nuclear safety (INSAG-10). 1996. https://doi.org/INSAG-10. Fleming, 2002, A risk informed defense-in-depth framework for existing and advanced reactors, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 78, 205, 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00153-9 Apostolakis, 2004, How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment?, Risk Anal, 24, 515, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00455.x Yang, 2014, Fukushima dai-ichi accident: lessons learned and future actions from the risk perspectives, Nucl Eng Technol, 46, 27, 10.5516/NET.03.2014.702 2005