British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
1365-2125
0306-5251
Anh Quốc
Cơ quản chủ quản: WILEY , Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Các bài báo tiêu biểu
Interest in patient adherence has increased in recent years, with a growing literature that shows the pervasiveness of poor adherence to appropriately prescribed medications. However, four decades of adherence research has not resulted in uniformity in the terminology used to describe deviations from prescribed therapies. The aim of this review was to propose a new taxonomy, in which adherence to medications is conceptualized, based on behavioural and pharmacological science, and which will support quantifiable parameters. A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO from database inception to 1 April 2009. The objective was to identify the different conceptual approaches to adherence research. Definitions were analyzed according to time and methodological perspectives. A taxonomic approach was subsequently derived, evaluated and discussed with international experts. More than 10 different terms describing medication‐taking behaviour were identified through the literature review, often with differing meanings. The conceptual foundation for a new, transparent taxonomy relies on three elements, which make a clear distinction between processes that describe actions through established routines (‘Adherence to medications’, ‘Management of adherence’) and the discipline that studies those processes (‘Adherence‐related sciences’). ‘Adherence to medications’ is the process by which patients take their medication as prescribed, further divided into three quantifiable phases: ‘Initiation’, ‘Implementation’ and ‘Discontinuation’. In response to the proliferation of ambiguous or unquantifiable terms in the literature on medication adherence, this research has resulted in a new conceptual foundation for a transparent taxonomy. The terms and definitions are focused on promoting consistency and quantification in terminology and methods to aid in the conduct, analysis and interpretation of scientific studies of medication adherence.
Eicosapentaenoic acid (
The novel direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), dabigatran etexilate (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG), shows potential as an oral antithrombotic agent. Two double‐blind, randomized trials were undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and tolerability of orally administered dabigatran etexilate in healthy male subjects.
Dabigatran etexilate or placebo was administered orally at single doses of 10–400 mg (
Dabigatran etexilate was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran reached within 2 h of administration. This was followed by a rapid distribution/elimination phase and a terminal phase, with associated estimated half‐lives of 8–10 h and 14–17 h with single and multiple dose administrations, respectively. Dabigatran exhibited linear PK characteristics with dose‐proportional increases observed in maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve. Steady‐state conditions were reached within 3 days with multiple dosing. The mean apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase (
These data suggest that dabigatran etexilate is a promising novel oral DTI with predictable PK and PD characteristics and good tolerability. Further investigation of dabigatran etexilate for the treatment and prophylaxis of patients with arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders, acute coronary syndromes and other medical conditions is warranted.
1 A total of three hundred and nineteen new chemical entities (NCEs) were investigated in man for the first time between 1964 and 1985 by seven UK‐owned pharmaceutical companies. The majority (96.2%), were self‐originated by the UK company or one of its overseas subsidiaries. 2 There was an increase in the number of NCEs investigated each year in man, doubling from an average of 12 per year up to 1980, to over 20 per year between 1981 and 1985. The majority of first drug evaluations in human volunteers were carried out in the UK (92.2%), in contrast to evaluation of new medicines in patients, where 42.9% were first tested outside the UK. 3 The majority of NCEs evaluated in man (78%), were in four therapeutic classes: anti‐infectives (32%), anti‐allergics (22%), drugs acting on the central nervous system (13%) and cardiovascular system agents (11%). 4 By the end of 1985, 49 (15.4%) of these NCEs had been marketed in the UK and 198 (62.0%) discontinued from further development. The main reasons for termination were inappropriate pharmacokinetics in man (39.4%), and lack of clinical efficacy (29.3%). 5 Average development times increased from less than 2 years between 1964 and 1965, to around 8 years in the 1980s with a consequent reduction in the effective patent life.
Poisoning by paraquat herbicide is a major medical problem in parts of Asia while sporadic cases occur elsewhere. The very high case fatality of paraquat is due to inherent toxicity and lack of effective treatments. We conducted a systematic search for human studies that report toxicokinetics, mechanisms, clinical features, prognosis and treatment. Paraquat is rapidly but incompletely absorbed and then largely eliminated unchanged in urine within 12–24 h. Clinical features are largely due to intracellular effects. Paraquat generates reactive oxygen species which cause cellular damage via lipid peroxidation, activation of NF‐κB, mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in many organs. Kinetics of distribution into these target tissues can be described by a two‐compartment model. Paraquat is actively taken up against a concentration gradient into lung tissue leading to pneumonitis and lung fibrosis. Paraquat also causes renal and liver injury. Plasma paraquat concentrations, urine and plasma dithionite tests and clinical features provide a good guide to prognosis. Activated charcoal and Fuller's earth are routinely given to minimize further absorption. Gastric lavage should not be performed. Elimination methods such as haemodialysis and haemoperfusion are unlikely to change the clinical course. Immunosuppression with dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone is widely practised, but evidence for efficacy is very weak. Antioxidants such as acetylcysteine and salicylate might be beneficial through free radical scavenging, anti‐inflammatory and NF‐κB inhibitory actions. However, there are no published human trials. The case fatality is very high in all centres despite large variations in treatment.
• Prior to the commencement of this study, it was already known that rivaroxaban is partially cleared via the kidneys and an influence of renal insufficiency on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and exposure was anticipated.
• As many patients in the target indications of rivaroxaban will be elderly, a precise quantitative knowledge of the influence of renal function on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and exposure is mandatory for adequate labelling recommendations (in the context of benefit/risk provided by phase III studies) to guide therapy. This study provided detailed insight on both rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic behaviour in renal impairment including severely renally impaired subjects.
This study evaluated the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban (10 mg single dose), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor.
Subjects (
Renal clearance of rivaroxaban decreased with increasing renal impairment. Thus, plasma concentrations increased and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) LS‐mean values were 1.44‐fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 1.9; mild), 1.52‐fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.0; moderate) and 1.64‐fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.2; severe impairment) higher than in healthy controls. Corresponding values for the LS‐mean of the AUC for prolongation of prothrombin time were 1.33‐fold (90% CI 0.92, 1.92; mild), 2.16‐fold (90% CI 1.51, 3.10 moderate) and 2.44‐fold (90% CI 1.70, 3.49 severe) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively. Likewise, the LS‐mean of the AUC for Factor Xa inhibition in subjects with mild renal impairment was 1.50‐fold (90% CI 1.07, 2.10) higher than in healthy subjects. In subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, the increase was 1.86‐fold (90% CI 1.34, 2.59) and 2.0‐fold (90% CI 1.44, 2.78) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively.
Rivaroxaban clearance is decreased with increasing renal impairment, leading to increased plasma exposure and pharmacodynamic effects, as expected for a partially renally excreted drug. However, the influence of renal function on rivaroxaban clearance was moderate, even in subjects with severe renal impairment.