Governing agricultural innovation: A comprehensive framework to underpin sustainable transitions

Journal of Rural Studies - Tập 89 - Trang 407-422 - 2022
Auvikki de Boon1, Camilla Sandström2, David Christian Rose1
1School for Agriculture, Policy, and Development, University of Reading, UK Agricultural Building, Early Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK
2Department of Political Science, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aase, 2013, Innovation as an expression of adaptive capacity to change in Himalayan farming, Mt. Res. Dev., 33, 4, 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00025.1

Ajzen, 1991, The theory of planed behaviour, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50, 179, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In: D. Albarracín, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (eds.). The Handbook of Attitudes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 173-221.

Baker, S. (2009). In pursuit of sustainable development: a governance perspective. In: 8th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE), Ljubljana (Vol. vol. 29).

Beland Lindahl, K. (2008). reportFrame Analysis, Place Perceptions and the Politics of Natural Resource Management, Exploring a Forest Policy Controversy in Sweden. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2008:60.

Bernstein, 2004, Legitimacy in global environmental governance, J. Int. Law Int. Relat., 1, 139

Blok, V. & Lemmens, P. (2015). The emerging concept of responsible innovation. Three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In: B.J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (eds.). Responsible Innovation 2. Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, Springer, pp. 19-35.

European Commission (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal, COM(2019)640 final. Retrieved from: https://eur- lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1& format=PDF. Accessed: 02.03.2021.

IPBES (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio E.S., H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, et al. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages, doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579.

Kowalski, M., Welter, F., Schulte-Cörne, S., Jooß, C., Richert, A., & Jeschke, S. (2016). New challenges in innovation-process-management. A criticism and expansion of unidirectional innovation-process-models. In: S. Jeschke, I. Isenhardt, F. Hees,& K. Henning (eds). Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2015/2016. Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42620-4_56.

Leach, M., Bloom, G., Ely, A., Nightingale, P., Scoones, I., Shah, E., & Smith, A. (2007). Understanding Governance: Pathways to Sustainability, STEPS Working Paper 2, Brighton: STEPS Centre.

Lindner, R., Daimer, S., Beckert, B., …, & Wydra, S. (2016). Addressing Directionality: Orientation Failure and the Systems of Innovation Heuristic. Toward Reflexive Governance. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers - Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 52, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-4087463.

Paris Agreement (2015). Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris _agreement.pdf. Accessed: 02.02.2021.

Rajalahti, R., Janssen, W., & Pehu, E. (2008). Agricultural Innovation Systems: from Diagnostics toward Operational Practices. Agriculture & Rural Development Department, World Bank.

Schut, M., Cadilhon, J.J., Misiko, M., & Dror, I. (2018). Do mature innovation platforms make a difference in agricultural research for development? A meta-analysis of case studies. Experimental Agriculture, 54(1), 96-119.

Solidarity and Just Transition Silesia Declaration (2018). Retrieved from: https://cop24.gov.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/Solidarity_and_Just_Transition_Silesia_Declaration_2_.pdf. Accessed: 12.03.2021.

STEPS Centre (n.d.) Pathways methods vignettes. Retrieved from: https://steps-centre.org/pathways-methods-vignettes/. Accessed: 13.05.2021.

Thompson, J., Millestone, E., Scoones, I., Ely, A., Marshall, F., Shah, E., & Stagl, S. (2007). Agri-food system dynamics: pathways to sustainability in an era of uncertainty, STEPS Working Paper 4, Brighton: STEPS Centre.

Voss, 2011, The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management, Ecol. Soc., 16, 9, 10.5751/ES-04051-160209