Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology

KM Esvelt, 2014, Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations, eLife, 3, e03401, 10.7554/eLife.03401

D Sarewitz, 2015, Science can't solve it, Nature, 522, 412, 10.1038/522413a

J Kuzma, 2011, Renegotiating GM crop regulation: Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops, EMBO Rep, 12, 883, 10.1038/embor.2011.160

2015, International summit on human gene editing

House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Genetically modified insects. 1st Report of Session 2015–16. 2015. London: House of Lords. HL Paper 68.

2015, Project information

B Wynne, 2006, Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—Hitting the notes, but missing the music?, Public Health Genomics, 9, 211, 10.1159/000092659

KK Jensen, 2003, Making the EU “Risk Window” transparent: The normative foundations of the environmental risk assessment of GMOs, Environ Biosafety Res, 2, 161, 10.1051/ebr:2003011

2012, Emerging biotechnologies: Technology, choice and the public good

A Stirling, 2010, Keep it complex, Nature, 468, 1029, 10.1038/4681029a

T Caulfield, 2012, Science and the sources of hype, Public Health Genomics, 15, 209, 10.1159/000336533

S Hartley, 2016, Policy masquerading as science: an examination of non-state actor involvement in European risk assessment policy for genetically modified animals, J Eur Public Policy, 23, 276, 10.1080/13501763.2015.1049196

E Fisher, 2015, Mapping the integrative field: Taking stock of socio-technical collaborations, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2, 39, 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671

I de Melo-Martín, 2008, Beyond risk. A more realistic risk–benefit analysis of agricultural biotechnologies, EMBO Rep, 9, 302, 10.1038/embor.2008.39

A Stirling, 2012, Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience, PLoS Biol, 10, e1001233, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001233

R Owen, 2012, Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society, Science and Public Policy, 39, 751, 10.1093/scipol/scs093

A Delgado, 2011, Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology, Public Underst Sci, 20, 826, 10.1177/0963662510363054

J Wilsdon, 2004, See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream

Stilgoe J, Reflections on Rothamsted. 2012. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jackstilgoe.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/reflections-on-rothamsted/" xlink:type="simple">https://jackstilgoe.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/reflections-on-rothamsted/</ext-link>

Wynne B, Catacora-Vargas G, Farming and knowledge monocultures are misconceived. SciDevNet. 2013. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.scidev.net/global/agriculture/opinion/farming-and-knowledge-monocultures-are-misconceived.html" xlink:type="simple">http://www.scidev.net/global/agriculture/opinion/farming-and-knowledge-monocultures-are-misconceived.html</ext-link>.

F Wickson, 2014, Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: Learning from transdisciplinarity, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1, 254, 10.1080/23299460.2014.963004

A Stirling, 2001, A novel approach to the appraisal of technical risk: a multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop, Environ Plann C Gov Policy, 19, 529, 10.1068/c8s

F Gillund, 2010, Perspectives on salmon feed: A deliberative assessment of several alternative feed resources, J Agr Environ Ethic, 23, 527, 10.1007/s10806-010-9237-7

KJ Boor, 2015, Commitment to responsible science guides CALS plans for moth Trials