The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review
Tóm tắt
The multi-level perspective (MLP) is a prominent transition framework. The MLP posits that transitions come about through interaction processes within and among three analytical levels: niches, socio-technical regimes and a socio-technical landscape. This systematic review provides an overview on the use of the MLP in research on agro-food sustainability transitions. In particular, it analyses the understanding, conceptualisation and operationalisation of niches, regimes and landscapes. Niches considered in the selected papers include agro-ecology, organic agriculture, permaculture, conservation agriculture, integrated farming, and alternative food networks. Regime refers to industrial, conventional agriculture. The researched regime is often not clearly described and its operationalisation is a matter of deliberation. Landscape level is generally overlooked; when it is considered it refers to international trends and developments. Many scholars highlight the inadequacy of transition pathways in the MLP for the agro-food sector. Moreover, transition impacts are rarely addressed and the research field generally overlooks the analysis of the sustainability of niches and, consequently, of transitions. Research on transitions in the agro-food sector borrows from the MLP its generalizability and poor empirical operationalisation of niche, regime and landscape concepts. Therefore, integrative conceptualisation and operationalisation of the MLP elements is required to accommodate the complexity of sustainability transition processes and the peculiarities of the agro-food system.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Geels, F.W. (2018, September 10). Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability. Available online: http://environmentalscience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389414-e-587.
(2018, June 12). STRN A Research Agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network. Available online: https://transitionsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/STRN_Research_Agenda_2017.pdf.
Van de Graf, T., Sovacool, B.K., Gosh, A., Kern, F., and Klare, M.T. (2016). Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy, Palgrave Macmillan.
(2018, September 10). Sustainability Transitions Research Network A Mission Statement and Research Agenda for the Sustainability Transitions Research Network. Available online: www.transitionsnetwork.org/files/STRN_research_agenda_20_August_2010(2).pdf.
Hinrichs, 2014, Transitions to sustainability: A change in thinking about food systems change?, Agric. Hum. Values, 31, 143, 10.1007/s10460-014-9479-5
Poppe, K., Termeer, C., and Slingerland, M. (2009). Transition: Contradictory but interacting processes of change in Dutch agriculture. Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas, Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Van der Ploeg, J.D., and Marsden, T. (2008). Unfolding Webs. The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development, Van Gorcum.
Elzen, B., Augustyn, A.M., Barbier, M., and van Mierlo, B. (2017). AgroEcological Transitions: Changes and Breakthroughs in the Making, Wageningen University & Research.
2019, Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: A systematic review of research themes and an analysis of research gaps, J. Clean. Prod., 221, 353, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.232
2019, Innovation-Sustainability Nexus in Agriculture Transition: Case of Agroecology, Open Agric., 4, 1, 10.1515/opag-2019-0001
Allahyari, 2018, Transition towards sustainability in agriculture and food systems: Role of information and communication technologies, Inf. Process. Agric., 5, 456
Spaargaren, G., Oosterveer, P., and Loeber, A. (2013). Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in the Age of Reflexive Modernity, Routledge.
Maye, 2017, Understanding Sustainable Food System Transitions: Practice, Assessment and Governance, Sociol. Ruralis, 57, 267, 10.1111/soru.12177
Sutherland, L.-A., Darnhofer, I., Wilson, G., and Zagata, L. (2014). Transition Pathways towards Sustainability in European Agriculture, CABI Publishing.
Ingram, 2015, Interactions between Niche and Regime: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe, J. Agric. Educ. Ext., 21, 55, 10.1080/1389224X.2014.991114
Klerkx, 2019, Characterizing diversity of food systems in view of sustainability transitions. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 39, 1, 10.1007/s13593-018-0550-2
Truffer, B., and Markard, J. (2018, May 10). Transition Studies: A PhD Guide into the Wild. Available online: https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/.../sustainability.../Truffer_Markard_2017.pdf.
(2018, April 20). Sustainability Transitions Research Network Newsletter 27: March 2018. Available online: https://transitionsnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/27th-STRN-newsletter-.pdf.
Geels, F.W. (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Geels, F.W., and Loorbach, D. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Routhledge.
Lachman, 2013, A survey and review of approaches to study transitions, Energy Policy, 58, 269, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013
Falcone, 2014, Sustainability Transitions: A Survey of an Emerging Field of Research, Environ. Manag. Sustain. Dev., 3, 61, 10.5296/emsd.v3i2.6239
Sovacool, 2017, Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change, Soc. Stud. Sci., 47, 703, 10.1177/0306312717709363
El Bilali, H. (2018). Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–36.
Kemp, 1994, Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. The problem of technological regime shifts, Futures, 26, 1023, 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X
Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003
Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651
Raven, 2010, Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: Comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973–2004), Technovation, 30, 87, 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.006
Wiskerke, J., and van der Ploeg, J.-D. (2004). Reflecting on novelty production and niche management in agriculture. Seeds of Transition. Essays on Novelty Production, Niches and Regimes in Agriculture, van Gorcum.
Olshoorn, X., and Wieczorek, A.J. (2006). Managing transitions for sustainable development. Understanding Industrial Transformation. Views from Different Disciplines, Springer.
Loorbach, 2010, Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework, Governance, 23, 161, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Loorbach, 2008, Governance in the energy transition: Practice of transition management in the Netherlands, Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag., 9, 294, 10.1504/IJETM.2008.019039
Rayner, S., and Malone, E.L. (1998). Technological change. Human Choice and Climate Change, Battelle Press.
Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Geels, 2005, The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860-1930), Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 17, 445, 10.1080/09537320500357319
Geels, 2010, Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Res. Policy, 39, 495, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
Smith, 2005, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Res. Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
Smith, 2010, Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Res. Policy, 39, 435, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems, Res. Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
Holtz, 2008, Specifying “regime”—A framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 75, 623, 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.010
Geels, 2006, Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970), Technovation, 26, 999, 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.08.010
Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework, Res. Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
Geels, 2006, Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930), Technol. Soc., 28, 445, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006
Maye, 2018, Examining Innovation for Sustainability from the Bottom Up: An Analysis of the Permaculture Community in England, Sociol. Ruralis, 58, 331, 10.1111/soru.12141
Raman, 2014, Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys, J. Clean. Prod., 65, 224, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057
Smith, 2006, Green niches in sustainable development: The case of organic food in the United Kingdom, Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy, 24, 439, 10.1068/c0514j
Ruwet, 2015, Towards a governance of sustainable consumption transitions: How institutional factors influence emerging local food systems in Belgium, Local Environ., 20, 874, 10.1080/13549839.2013.872090
Brunori, 2012, On the New Social Relations around and beyond Food. Analysing Consumers’ Role and Action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (Solidarity Purchasing Groups), Sociol. Ruralis, 52, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00552.x
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., and The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med., 6.
Davidson, 2016, Food safety risks, disruptive events and alternative beef production: A case study of agricultural transition in Alberta, Agric. Hum. Values, 33, 359, 10.1007/s10460-015-9609-8
Elzen, 2011, Normative contestation in transitions “in the making”: Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry, Res. Policy, 40, 263, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.018
Immink, 2013, The livestock sector and its stakeholders in the search to meet the animal welfare requirements of society, J. Chain Netw. Sci., 13, 151, 10.3920/JCNS2013.1005
Schermer, 2015, Die Milchwirtschaft in Österreich–ein Beispiel für sozio-technische Transformation, Österr. Z. Soziol., 40, 33, 10.1007/s11614-015-0154-x
Bush, 2014, Making social sense of aquaculture transitions, Ecol. Soc., 19, art50, 10.5751/ES-06677-190350
Ayre, 2015, Community sustainability and agricultural landscape change: Insights into the durability and vulnerability of the productivist regime, Sustain. Sci., 10, 207, 10.1007/s11625-014-0268-2
Bell, 2012, Emerging community food production and pathways for urban landscape transitions, Emerg. Complex. Organ., 14, 31
Morgan, 2015, Reframing the foodscape: The emergent world of urban food policy, Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space, 47, 1558
Cohen, 2015, Transitioning the food system: A strategic practice management approach for cities, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 17, 199, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.01.003
Gorissen, 2018, Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk, J. Clean. Prod., 173, 171, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052
Chiffoleau, Y., Millet-Amrani, S., and Canard, A. (2016). From Short Food Supply Chains to Sustainable Agriculture in Urban Food Systems: Food Democracy as a Vector of Transition. Agriculture, 6.
Jacobs, 2017, Towards phosphorus sustainability in North America: A model for transformational change, Environ. Sci. Policy, 77, 151, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.009
Audet, R., Lefèvre, S., Brisebois, É., and El-Jed, M. (2017). Structuring Tensions and Key Relations of Montreal Seasonal Food Markets in the Sustainability Transition of the Agri-Food Sector. Sustainability, 9.
Bui, 2016, Sustainability transitions: Insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in agri-food systems, J. Rural Stud., 48, 92, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.003
Stahlbrand, L. (2016). The Food For Life Catering Mark: Implementing the Sustainability Transition in University Food Procurement. Agriculture, 6.
Crivits, 2013, Designing an explanatory practice framework: Local food systems as a case, J. Consum. Cult., 13, 306, 10.1177/1469540513484321
Pitt, H., and Jones, M. (2016). Scaling up and out as a Pathway for Food System Transitions. Sustainability, 8.
Wiskerke, 2003, On promising niches and constraining sociotechnical regimes: The case of Dutch wheat and bread, Environ. Plan. A, 35, 429, 10.1068/a3512
To, 2018, Future energy transitions for bagasse cogeneration: Lessons from multi-level and policy innovations in Mauritius, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 68, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.051
Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., and Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards Circular Economy in the Food System. Sustainability, 8.
Lutz, 2013, Do local food networks foster socio-ecological transitions towards food sovereignty? Learning from real place experiences, Sustainability, 5, 4778, 10.3390/su5114778
Meynard, 2017, Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems, Agric. Syst., 157, 330, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.08.002
Morrissey, 2014, Identifying Transition Capacity for Agri-food Regimes: Application of the Multi-level Perspective for Strategic Mapping, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 16, 281, 10.1080/1523908X.2013.845521
Sutherland, L.-A., Darnhofer, I., Wilson, G., and Zagata, L. (2015). Socio-technical transitions in farming: Key concepts. Transition Pathways towards Sustainability in Agriculture. Case Studies from Europe, CABI.
Loorbach, D.A. (2007). Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development, Erasmus University Amsterdam.
Isgren, E., and Ness, B. (2017). Agroecology to Promote Just Sustainability Transitions: Analysis of a Civil Society Network in the Rwenzori Region, Western Uganda. Sustainability, 9.
Levidow, 2014, Agroecological Research: Conforming or Transforming the Dominant Agro-Food Regime?, Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst., 38, 1127, 10.1080/21683565.2014.951459
Pant, 2016, Paradox of mainstreaming agroecology for regional and rural food security in developing countries, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 111, 305, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.001
Duru, 2014, A conceptual framework for thinking now (and organising tomorrow) the agroecological transition at the level of the territory, Cah. Agric., 23, 84, 10.1684/agr.2014.0691
Hauser, 2017, Organic agriculture in post-war Uganda: Emergence of pioneer-led niches between 1986 and 1993, Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 32, 169, 10.1017/S1742170516000132
Seoane, 2017, Transiciones hacia una agricultura sostenible: El nicho de la apicultura orgánica en una cooperativa Argentina, Mundo Agrar., 18, 049, 10.24215/15155994e049
Ingram, 2018, Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 26, 117, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.001
Vankeerberghen, 2016, The transition to conservation agriculture: An insularization process towards sustainability, Int. J. Agric. Sustain., 14, 392, 10.1080/14735903.2016.1141561
Vlahos, 2017, Integrated farming in Greece: A transition-to-sustainability perspective, Int. J. Agric. Resour. Gov. Ecol., 13, 43
Hassink, 2013, Multifunctional Agriculture Meets Health Care: Applying the Multi-Level Transition Sciences Perspective to Care Farming in the Netherlands, Sociol. Ruralis, 53, 223, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00579.x
Hassink, 2018, Enriching the multi-level perspective by better understanding agency and challenges associated with interactions across system boundaries. The case of care farming in the Netherlands: Multifunctional agriculture meets health care, J. Rural Stud., 57, 186, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.018
Hassink, 2014, Farming with care: The evolution of care farming in the Netherlands, NJAS-Wageningen J. Life Sci., 68, 1, 10.1016/j.njas.2013.11.001
Konefal, 2015, Governing Sustainability Transitions: Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives and Regime Change in United States Agriculture, Sustainability, 7, 612, 10.3390/su7010612
Marsden, 2013, From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures, J. Rural Stud., 29, 123, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.10.001
Vivero-Pol, J. (2017). Food as Commons or Commodity? Exploring the Links between Normative Valuations and Agency in Food Transition. Sustainability, 9.
Sutherland, L., Darnhofer, I., Wilson, G.A., and Zagata, L. (2015). Transition Pathways towards Sustainability in Agriculture: Case Studies from Europe, CABI.
Dagerskog, 2018, Green niche actors navigating an opaque opportunity context: Prospects for a sustainable transformation of Ethiopian agriculture, Land Use Policy, 71, 409, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.053
Nygaard, 2018, The rise and fall of foreign private investment in the jatropha biofuel value chain in Ghana, Environ. Sci. Policy, 84, 224, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.007
Punt, 2018, Expert opinions on the acceptance of alternative methods in food safety evaluations: Formulating recommendations to increase acceptance of non-animal methods for kinetics, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 92, 145, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.11.015
Zwartkruis, J.V., Berg, H., Hof, A.F., and Kok, M.T.J. (2018). Agricultural nature conservation in the Netherlands: Three lenses on transition pathways. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 1–12.
Belmin, 2018, Contribution of transition theory to the study of geographical indications, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 27, 32, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.002
Feyereisen, 2017, Fair Trade Milk Initiative in Belgium: Bricolage as an Empowering Strategy for Change, Sociol. Ruralis, 57, 297, 10.1111/soru.12174
Miele, M., Higgins, V., Bjørkhaug, H., and Truninger, M. (2017). Creating Actionable Knowledge for Sustainability: A Case of “Standards in the Making”. Transforming the Rural (Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Volume 24), Emerald Publishing Limited.
Paschen, 2017, Enrolling advisers in governing privatised agricultural extension in Australia: Challenges and opportunities for the research, development and extension system, J. Agric. Educ. Ext., 23, 265, 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1320642
Maru, 2018, Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective, Agric. Syst., 165, 310, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.012
Papachristos, 2016, A retroductive systems-based methodology for socio-technical transitions research, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 108, 1, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.007
Schut, 2016, Innovation Platforms: Experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development, Exp. Agric., 52, 537, 10.1017/S001447971500023X
Ingram, 2015, Framing niche-regime linkage as adaptation: An analysis of learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture across Europe, J. Rural Stud., 40, 59, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.003
Morrissey, 2015, Towards Sustainable Agri-Food Systems, Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev., 6, 41, 10.4018/IJSESD.2015070104
Sutherland, 2015, Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions, Res. Policy, 44, 1543, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.013
Slingerland, 2014, Jatropha Developments in Mozambique: Analysis of Structural Conditions Influencing Niche-Regime Interactions, Sustainability, 6, 7541, 10.3390/su6117541
Diaz, 2013, Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche–regime interactions?, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 8, 62, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.002
Hargreaves, 2013, Up, Down, Round and Round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability, Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space, 45, 402, 10.1068/a45124
Li, 2013, Towards a regime change in the organization of the seed supply system in China, Exp. Agric., 49, 114, 10.1017/S001447971200097X
Lawhon, 2012, Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 36, 354, 10.1177/0309132511427960
Meybeck, A., and Redfern, S. (2014, January 10–11). The role of knowledge in transitions to sustainable food systems: Examples from institutional innovations. Proceedings of the Knowledge and Information for Sustainable Food Systems; a Workshop of the FAO/UNEP Programme on Sustainable Food Systems, Rome, Italy.
Raven, 2007, Multi-Regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power Technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 19, 491, 10.1080/09537320701403441
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., and Schot, J. (2010). The Dynamics of Transitions: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge.
Liebowitz, S.J., and Margolis, S.E. (1995). Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History. SSRN Electron. J., 205–226.
Poppe, K.J., Termeer, C., and Slingerland, M. (2009). The relationship between description and prescription in transition research. Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Periurban Areas, Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Res. Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010
Raven, 2007, Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003), Energy Policy, 35, 2197, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005
Konrad, 2008, Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: Evidence from German utility sectors, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 1190, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014
Smith, 2007, Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 19, 427, 10.1080/09537320701403334
Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
Berkhout, 2011, Avoiding Environmental Convergence: A Possible Role for Sustainability Experiments in Latecomer Countries?, Int. J. Inst. Econ., 3, 367
Elzen, 2012, Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 5, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.006
Klerkx, 2010, Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment, Agric. Syst., 103, 390, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012
Altieri, M., Nicholls, C., and Montalba, R. (2017). Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective. Sustainability, 9.
Lockie, 2005, The “Conventionalisation” Thesis Reconsidered: Structural and Ideological Transformation of Australian Organic Agriculture, Sociol. Ruralis, 45, 284, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00306.x
Darnhofer, 2010, Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev., 30, 67, 10.1051/agro/2009011
Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Res. Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
Tripsas, 1997, Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry, Strateg. Manag. J., 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.0.CO;2-0
Rothaermel, 2001, Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation, Strateg. Manag. J., 22, 687, 10.1002/smj.180
Rothaermel, 2001, Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent’s advantage: An empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry, Res. Policy, 30, 1235, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00142-6
Iles, 2016, Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 4, 000115, 10.12952/journal.elementa.000115
Geels, 2018, Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016), Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 46, 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008
Schäpke, N. (2018). Linking Transitions to Sustainability: Individual Agency, Normativity and Transdisciplinary Collaborations in Transition Management, Leuphana University of Lüneburg.
2018, Relation between innovation and sustainability in the agro-food system, Ital. J. Food Sci., 30, 200
El Bilali, H., Callenius, C., Strassner, C., and Probst, L. (2018). Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems. Food Energy Secur., e00154.
Hargreaves, T., Haxeltine, A., Longhurst, N., and Seyfang, G. (2011). Sustainability Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Civil Society, the Multi-Level Perspective and Practice Theory, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
Meelen, 2013, Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 25, 957, 10.1080/09537325.2013.823146
Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality, Berg.
McMeekin, 2012, Sustainability transitions and final consumption: Practices and socio-technical systems, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 24, 345, 10.1080/09537325.2012.663960
Probst, 2017, Towards an Integrated Analytical Framework To Map Sustainability Transitions in Food Systems, Agrofor, 2, 24