Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability - Tập 39 - Trang 187-201 - 2019
Frank W Geels1
1Sustainable Consumption Institute & Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School West, Room 8.050, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Res Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 Ivanova, 2016, Environmental impact assessment of household consumption, J Ind Ecol, 20, 526, 10.1111/jiec.12371 2004 Farla, 2012, Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources, Technol Forecast Soc, 79, 991, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001 Fuenfschilling, 2016, The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems – an analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector, Technol Forecast Soc, 103, 298, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023 Geels, 2016, The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014), Res Policy, 45, 896, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 Rosenbloom, 2016, Framing the sun: a discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada, Res Policy, 45, 1275, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.012 Dzebo, 2017, A new regime and then what? Cracks and tensions in the socio-technical regime of the Swedish heat energy system, Energy Res Soc Sci, 29, 113, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.018 Mazur, 2015, Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 14, 84, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.005 Berkeley, 2018, Assessing the transition towards battery electric vehicles: a Multi-Level Perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 106, 320, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.004 Levidow, 2014, Agroecological research: conforming—or transforming the dominant agro-food regime?, Agroecol Sustain Food, 38, 1127, 10.1080/21683565.2014.951459 Mylan, 2019, Rage against the regime: niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 31, 233, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.001 Moradi, 2018, A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: what are the future transition pathways?, Technol Forecast Soc, 126, 231, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.002 Smith, 2010, Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of a multi-level perspective and its challenges, Res Policy, 39, 435, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 Bui, 2016, Sustainability transitions: insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in agri-food systems, J Rural Stud, 48, 92, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.003 Tuama, 2015, Ripples through the city: understanding the processes set in motion through embedding a public bike sharing scheme in a city, Res Transp Bus Manage, 15, 15, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.002 Morris, 2014, Less meat initiatives: an initial exploration of a diet-focused social innovation in transitions to a more sustainable regime of meat provisioning, Int J Sociol Agric Food, 21, 189 Hölsgens, 2018, Social innovations in the German energy transition: an attempt to use the heuristics of the multi-level perspective of transitions to analyze the diffusion process of social innovations, Energy Sustain Soc, 8, 8, 10.1186/s13705-018-0150-7 Hynes, 2016, Developing (tele)work? A multi-level sociotechnical perspective of telework in Ireland, Res Transp Econ, 57, 21, 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.06.008 Lepoutre, 2018, The (non-)emergence of mobile money systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative multilevel perspective of Kenya and Nigeria, Technol Forecast Soc, 131, 262, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.010 Hassink, 2018, Enriching the multi-level perspective by better understanding agency and challenges associated with interactions across system boundaries. The case of care farming in the Netherlands: multifunctional agriculture meets health care, J Rural Stud, 57, 186, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.018 Schneidewind, 2016, Three schools of transformation thinking: the impact of ideas, institutions, and technological innovation on transformation processes, GAIA, 25, 88, 10.14512/gaia.25.2.7 O’Brien, 2018, Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 31, 153, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010 Loorbach, 2017, Sustainability transition research: transforming science and practice for societal change, Annu Rev Environ Resour, 42, 599, 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 Røpke, 2016, Complementary system perspectives in ecological macroeconomics — the example of transition investments during the crisis, Ecol Econ, 121, 237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.018 Patterson, 2017, Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 24, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001 Feola, 2015, Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts, Ambio, 44, 376, 10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z Brand, 2016, “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term “Transformation” does not prevent multiple crises, GAIA, 25, 23, 10.14512/gaia.25.1.7 Temper, 2018, A perspective on radical transformations to sustainability: resistances, movements and alternatives, Sustain Sci, 13, 747, 10.1007/s11625-018-0543-8 Callon, 1987, Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis, 83 Latour, 1991, Technology is society made durable, 103 1996 Jenkins, 2018, Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: an ethical framework for global transformative change, Energy Policy, 117, 66, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036 Sareen, 2018, Bridging socio-technical and justice aspects of sustainable energy transitions, Appl Energy, 228, 624, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.104 Gillard, 2016, Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation, WIRES Clim Change, 7, 251, 10.1002/wcc.384 O’Brien, 2018, Transformations in socio-ecological systems, vol 25/2017, 29 Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Geels, 2017, Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonisation, Science, 357, 1242, 10.1126/science.aao3760 Klitkou, 2015, The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: the case of energy for road transport, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 16, 22, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.005 Nelson, 2008, Bounded rationality, cognitive maps, and trial and error learning, J Econ Behav Org, 67, 78, 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.002 Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitments and power relations, Res Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6 Normann, 2017, Policy networks in energy transitions: the cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in Norway, Technol Forecast Soc, 118, 80, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.004 Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technol Anal Strateg, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda and policy, Technol Anal Strateg, 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Sengers, 2019, Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review, Technol Forecast Soc, 145, 153, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031 Geels, 2006, Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973-2003), Technol Anal Strateg, 18, 375, 10.1080/09537320600777143 Olleros, 1986, Emerging industries and the burnout of pioneers, J Prod Innov Manag, 1, 5, 10.1111/1540-5885.310005 Pesch, 2019, Local sustainability initiatives: innovation and civic engagement in societal experiments, Eur Plan Stud, 27, 300, 10.1080/09654313.2018.1464549 Fuenfschilling, 2019, Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions, Eur Plan Stud, 27, 219, 10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977 Bulkeley, 2016, Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 22, 13, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003 2018 Lounsbury, 2001, Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources, Strategic Manag J, 22, 545, 10.1002/smj.188 Kivimaa, 2018, Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: a systematic review, Res Policy, 48, 1062, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006 Devine-Wright, 2017, A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: insights from energy storage, Energ Policy, 107, 27, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.020 Christensen, 1997 Meadowcroft, 2009, What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions, Policy Sci, 42, 323, 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z Roberts, 2018, Public storylines in the British transition from rail to road transport (1896–2000): discursive struggles in the Multi-Level Perspective, Sci Cult, 27, 513, 10.1080/09505431.2018.1519532 Smith, 2005, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Res Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 Berggren, 2015, Transition pathways revisited: established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry, Res Policy, 44, 1017, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.009 Turnheim, 2012, Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913-1997), Energ Policy, 50, 35, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060 Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Res Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 Geels, 2014, Regime resistance against low-carbon energy transitions: introducing politics and power in the multi-level perspective, Theory Cult Soc, 31, 21, 10.1177/0263276414531627 Markard, 2016, Socio-technical transitions and policy change: advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 18, 215, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003 Lockwood, 2017, Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research agenda, Environ Plann C, 35, 312 Roberts, 2019, Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture, Technol Forecast Soc, 140, 221, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019 Kern, 2018, Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: a critical survey, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 27, 102, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.001 Hermwille, 2016, The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom, Energy Res Soc Sci, 11, 237, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001 Hielscher, 2018, Contested smart and low-carbon energy futures: media discourses of smart meters in the United Kingdom, J Clean Prod, 195, 978, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.227 Roberts, 2017, Discursive destabilisation of socio-technical regimes: negative storylines and the decline of the American railroads, Energy Res Soc Sci, 31, 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.031 Rosenbloom, 2018, Framing low-carbon pathways: a discursive analysis of contending storylines surrounding the phase-out of coal-fired power in Ontario, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 27, 129, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.003 Seyfang, 2007, Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda, Environ Polit, 16, 583, 10.1080/09644010701419121 Seyfang, 2014, A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 13, 21, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004 Gernert, 2018, Grassroots initiatives as sustainability transition pioneers: implications and lessons for urban food systems, Urban Sci, 2, 23, 10.3390/urbansci2010023 Hargreaves, 2013, Grassroots innovations in community energy: the role of intermediaries in niche development, Global Environ Change, 23, 868, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 Hossain, 2018, Grassroots innovation: the state of the art and future perspectives, Technol Soc, 55, 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.008 White, 2013, Sustaining trajectories towards sustainability: dynamics and diversity in UK communal growing activities, Global Environ Change, 23, 838, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.004 Smith, 2011, The transition town network: a review of current evolutions and renaissance, Soc Mov Stud, 10, 99, 10.1080/14742837.2011.545229 Feola, 2014, Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: the case of the transition movement, Global Environ Change, 24, 232, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011 Dana LP, Gurau C, Hoy F, Ramadani V, Alexander T: Success factors and challenges of grassroots innovations: Learning from failure. Technol Forecast Soc [In press]. Cherp, 2017, Comparing electricity transitions: a historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and Japan, Energy Policy, 101, 612, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.044 Imbert, 2019, The transition towards a bio-based economy: a comparative study based on social network analysis, J Environ Manag, 230, 255, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.068 McMeekin, 2019, Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system, Res Policy, 48, 1216, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.007 Geels, 2018, Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016), Energy Res Soc Sci, 46, 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008 Hess, 2014, Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective, Res Policy, 43, 278, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008 Smink, 2015, Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies, Bus Strateg Environ, 24, 86, 10.1002/bse.1808 Penna, 2015, Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2011): an application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model, Res Policy, 44, 1029, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.010 Mayer, 2018, A just transition for coal miners? Accountability frames, community economic identity, and just transition policy support among local policy actors, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 28, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.03.006 Spencer, 2018, The 1.5°C target and coal sector transition: at the limits of societal feasibility, Clim Policy, 18, 335, 10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540 Rogge, 2017, Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: the case of the German Energiewende, Energy Res Soc Sci, 33, 128, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004 Davidson, 2019, Exnovating for a renewable energy transition, Nat Energy, 4, 254, 10.1038/s41560-019-0369-3 Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 Kuokkanen, 2018, Agency in regime destabilization through the selection environment: the Finnish food system’s sustainability transition, Res Policy, 47, 1513, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.006 Kungl, 2018, Sequence and alignment of external pressures in industry destabilization: understanding the downfall of incumbent utilities in the German energy transition (1998-2015), Environ Innov Soc Trans, 26, 78, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.003 Mignon, 2018, A typology of intermediary organizations and their impact on sustainability transition policies, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 29, 100, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.001 Mazzucato, 2018, Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities, Ind Corp Change, 27, 803, 10.1093/icc/dty034 Quitzow, 2015, Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India’s National Solar Mission, Res Policy, 44, 233, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.003 Sovacool, 2019 Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 Kern, 2015, Empowering sustainable niches: comparing UK and Dutch offshore wind developments, Technol Forecast Soc, 100, 344, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.004 Raven, 2016, Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 18, 164, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 Roberts, 2019, Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating, Technol Anal Strateg, 31, 1081, 10.1080/09537325.2019.1584286 Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis, Res Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Kern, 2017, Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes, Energy Res Soc Sci, 23, 11, 10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002 Edmondson DL, Kern F, Rogge KS: The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Res Policy [In press]. OECD, 2015 IPCC, 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C IEA, 2018 Sovacool, 2016, How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions, Energy Res Soc Sci, 13, 202, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020 Capoccia, 2007, The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism, World Polit, 59, 341, 10.1017/S0043887100020852 Meckling, 2015, Winning coalitions for climate policy, Science, 349, 1170, 10.1126/science.aab1336 Schmidt, 2017, Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics, Nat Energy, 2, 17084, 10.1038/nenergy.2017.84 Rosenbloom, 2019, Stability and climate policy? Harnessing insights on path dependence, policy feedback, and transition pathways, Energy Res Soc Sci, 50, 168, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.009 Hajer, 2015, Beyond cockpit-ism: four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals, Sustainability, 7, 1651, 10.3390/su7021651 Kern, 2014, Measuring and explaining paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy, Policy Polit, 42, 513, 10.1332/030557312X655765 Crouch, 2013 UNDP, 2018 Campiglio, 2016, Beyond carbon pricing: the role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy, Ecol Econ, 121, 220, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.020 European Commission, 2018, 97 Mazzucato, 2015, Innovation, the state and patient capital, Polit Q, 86, 98, 10.1111/1467-923X.12235 Campiglio, 2018, Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators, Nat Clim Change, 8, 462, 10.1038/s41558-018-0175-0 Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms, Environ Innov Soc Trans, 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 EEA, 2016 Flemish Environment Agency, 2014, Megatrends: far-reaching, but also out of reach? How do megatrends influence the environment in Flanders? Finnish Environment Institute, 2019 WWF, 2017