Using recursive partitioning Rasch trees to investigate differential item functioning in second language reading tests

Allalouf, 1999, Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items, Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 185, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00553.x

Aryadoust, 2012, Differential item functioning in while-listening performance tests: The case of IELTS listening test, International Journal of Listening, 26, 40, 10.1080/10904018.2012.639649

Aryadoust, 2016, Fitting the mixed Rasch model to a reading comprehension test: Exploring individual difference profiles in L2 reading, Language Testing, 33, 529, 10.1177/0265532215594640

Bacci, 2014, A class of multidimensional IRT models for ordinal polytomous item responses, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 43, 787, 10.1080/03610926.2013.827718

Bartolucci, 2007, A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items, Psychometrika, 72, 141, 10.1007/s11336-005-1376-9

Brandmaier, 2013, Structural equation model trees, Psychological Methods, 18, 71, 10.1037/a0030001

Bügel, 1996, Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge, The Modern Language Journal, 80, 15, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01133.x

Cadime, 2014, Invariance on a reading comprehension test in European Portuguese: A differential item functioning analysis between students from rural and urban areas, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 754, 10.1080/17405629.2014.938629

Chen, 2014, Exploring the utility of background and cognitive variables in explaining latent differential item functioning: An example of the PISA 2009 reading assessment, Educational Assessment, 19, 77, 10.1080/10627197.2014.903650

Chiu, 2006, Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries, Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331, 10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1

Cohen, 2005, A mixture model analysis of differential item functioning, Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 133, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2005.00007

Florit, 2011, The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies?, Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553, 10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6

Gnaldi, 2016, Joint assessment of the latent trait dimensionality and observed differential item functioning of students’ national tests, Quality & Quantity, 50, 1429, 10.1007/s11135-015-0214-0

Golden, 1993, A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall, Discourse Processes, 16, 203, 10.1080/01638539309544839

Hong, 2007, Mixed Rasch modeling of the self-rating depression scale: Incorporating latent class and Rasch rating scale models, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 280, 10.1177/0013164406292072

Jeon, 2014, L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis, Language Learning, 64, 160, 10.1111/lang.12034

Koo, 2014, Examining differential item functioning trends for English language learners in a reading test: A meta-analytical approach, Language Testing, 31, 89, 10.1177/0265532213496097

McGeown, 2012, Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account?, Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 328, 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x

Ownby, 2013, Differential item functioning related to age in the reading subtest of the test of functional health literacy in adults, Journal of Aging Research, 2013, 10.1155/2013/654589

Pae, H. (2011). Differential item functioning and unidimensionality in the Pearson Test of English Academic. Pearson Education Ltd. Retrieved from https://pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RN_Differential-ItemFunctioning.pdf.

Paris, 1990, How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction, 15

Perfetti, 2007, Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension, Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357, 10.1080/10888430701530730

Perfetti, 2005, The acquisition of reading comprehension skills, 227

Perfetti, 2014, Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension, Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22, 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Qian, 2002, Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective, Language Learning, 52, 513, 10.1111/1467-9922.00193

Rost, 1990, Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis, Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271, 10.1177/014662169001400305

Rupp, 2005, Quantifying subpopulation differences for a lack of invariance using complex examinee profiles: An exploratory multigroup approach using functional data analysis, Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 71, 10.1080/13803610500110430

Strobl, 2015, Rasch trees: A new method for detecting differential item functioning in the Rasch model, Psychometrika, 80, 289, 10.1007/s11336-013-9388-3

Strobl, 2009, An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests, Psychological Methods, 14, 323, 10.1037/a0016973

Tutz, 2015, Item focused trees for the identification of items in differential item functioning, Psychometrika

Yano, 1994, The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading, Language Learning, 44, 189, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x

Zeileis, 2007, Generalized M-fluctuation tests for parameter instability, Statistica Neerlandica, 61, 488, 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00371.x

Zeileis, 2008, Model-based recursive partitioning, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17, 492, 10.1198/106186008X319331

Zumbo, 2007, Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going, Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223, 10.1080/15434300701375832

Zumbo, 2015, A methodology for Zumbo’s third generation DIF analyses and the ecology of item responding, Language Assessment Quarterly, 12, 136, 10.1080/15434303.2014.972559