Differential Item Functioning Related to Age in the Reading Subtest of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults

Journal of Aging Research - Tập 2013 - Trang 1-6 - 2013
Raymond L. Ownby1, Drenna Waldrop‐Valverde2
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33318, USA
2Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Tóm tắt

Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when items in a measure perform in ways that are different for members of a target group when the different performance is not related to the individual’s overall ability to be assessed. DIF may arise for a number of reasons but is often evaluated in order to ensure that tests and measures are fair evaluations of a group’s abilities. Based on observations when administering the test, we developed the hypothesis that some items on the reading comprehension subtest of the Test of Functional Health Literacy (TOFHLA) might be differentially more difficult for older adults and the elderly due to its use of the cloze response format, in which the participant is required to determine what word, when placed in a blank space in a sentence, will ensure that the sentence is intelligible. Others have suggested that the cloze response format may make demands on verbal fluency, an ability that is reduced with the increasing age. Our analyses show that age-related DIF may present in a nearly one-half of reading comprehension items of the TOFHLA. Results of this measure in older persons should be interpreted cautiously.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2011, Annals of Internal Medicine, 155, 97, 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005

2004, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, 1

10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x

10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.022

1995, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537, 10.1007/BF02640361

2000, Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 105, 10.1016/S1041-6080(00)00034-0

2000, Cognitive aging and everyday life

1993, Journal of Reading, 37, 124

10.1037/a0017327

10.1370/afm.405

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.005

10.1080/10810730.2011.604392

10.1080/07317115.2012.657294

10.4081/ar.2012.e2

10.1037//0096-3445.131.4.567

2000

10.1089/apc.2009.0300

10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299

10.1007/s11606-011-1927-y

2012, Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education, 18, 9, 10.1007/BF03355174

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00691.x

10.1080/07317115.2011.588545

10.1176/appi.neuropsych.23.1.83

10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5

2012, Journal of Community Health, 17, 141