Đường phố hợp pháp: Một cách tiếp cận về sự khan hiếm đối với không gian mở đô thị trong các chuyển đổi về di động

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 3 - Trang 1-24 - 2021
Brett J. M. Petzer1, Anna J. Wieczorek1, Geert P. J. Verbong1
1Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Một sự chuyển đổi trong di động đô thị yêu cầu một sự chuyển đổi trong việc phân bổ không gian, vì hầu hết các hình thức di động đều phụ thuộc vào không gian mở đô thị để lưu thông và lưu trữ phương tiện. Mặc dù có sự chú ý ngày càng tăng đến không gian và không gian trong nghiên cứu chuyển đổi, nhưng các khía cạnh vật lý hữu hạn của không gian đô thị và các phương thức phân bổ của nó chưa được công nhận đầy đủ như một yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến các chuyển đổi di động. Một khuôn khổ khái niệm được giới thiệu để hỗ trợ so sánh giữa các thành phố về các quá trình mà theo đó không gian mở được (tái) phân phối giữa không gian lưu thông và quy định của xe ô tô và xe đạp. Khuôn khổ này phân biệt giữa các cơ chế phân bổ quy định và các thực hành chiếm hữu của các tác nhân. Việc áp dụng cho các trường hợp ở Amsterdam, Brussels và Birmingham cho thấy các mối quan hệ độc đáo được tạo ra bởi tính chất tổng số không của không gian mở đô thị giữa chế độ di động chiếm ưu thế và chế độ đi xe đạp phụ thuộc. Những mối quan hệ này mở ra một cách tiếp cận mới đối với các hình thức khóa chặt đang hoạt động ủng hộ các chế độ di động cụ thể trong môi trường xây dựng đô thị tương đối khó khăn. Về mặt thực nghiệm, các cơ chế phân bổ mà tạo thói quen sản xuất không gian dành cho xe ô tô ở cấp quốc gia trong Liên minh Châu Âu được chứng minh là phổ biến hơn rất nhiều so với các cơ chế dành cho không gian xe đạp, nêu bật những rào cản mà các chính sách cấp thành phố cấp tiến phải đối mặt nhằm mục đích tái phân bổ không gian.

Từ khóa

#di động đô thị #không gian mở #phân bổ không gian #xe ô tô #xe đạp #các cơ chế phân bổ #Amsterdam #Brussels #Birmingham

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adam L, Jones T, te Brömmelstroet M. Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies. Transportation. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9878-3.

Affolderbach J, Schulz C. Mobile transitions: Exploring synergies for urban sustainability research. Urban Stud. 2016;53:1942–57 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015583784.

Aldred R, Jungnickel K. Matter in or out of place? Bicycle parking strategies and their effects on people, practices and places. Soc Cult Geogr. 2013;14:604–24 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.790993.

Attias D, editor. The Automobile Revolution. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.

Avelino F, Grin J, Pel B, Jhagroe S. The politics of sustainability transitions. J Environ Policy Plan. 2016;18:557–67 https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782.

Banister D. Unsustainable transport city transport in the new century. London: Routledge; 2005.

Banister D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy. 2008;15:73–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.

Barrington-Leigh C, Millard-Ball A. Global trends toward urban street-network sprawl. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:1941–50 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905232116.

Barter PA. A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform. Int J Urban Sci. 2015;19:136–56 https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.927740.

Becker S, Moss T, Naumann M. The Importance of Space: Towards a Socio-Material and Political Geography of Energy Transitions. In: Gailing L, Moss T, editors. Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. p. 93–108.

Birmingham City Council. Birmingham Parking: Supplementary Planning Document. Birmingham: Consultation Draft; 2019.

Birmingham City Council (2020a) Birmingham Transport Plan (Draft).

Birmingham City Council. Emergency Birmingham Transport Plan: A low carbon, clean air recovery after COVID-19. UK: Birmingham; 2020b.

Borch C. Urban Commons: Rethinking the City. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2015.

Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M, Eyre N. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy. 2013;53:331–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.

Brown MG. Access, Property and American Urban Space. London: Routledge; 2016.

Bruxelles Environnement (2019) Mieux se déplacer à Bruxelles: Des idées simples qui donnent envie de bouger.

Bruxelles Mobilité (2016a) Le partage de l’espace public en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.

Bruxelles Mobilité (2016b) Espace pour le transport public.

Bruxelles Mobilité. Diagnostic de mobilité en Région bruxelloise. Brussels: Service public régional de Bruxelles; 2017.

Bruxelles Mobilité. Plan régional de mobilité 2020–2030: Plan stratégique et opérationnel. Brussels: Bruxelles Mobilité; 2020.

Buiter H. Constructing Dutch Streets. In: Urban Machinery: Inside Modern European Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008.

Bulkeley H, Broto VC, Hodson M, Marvin S. Cities and low carbon transitions. London: Routledge; 2010.

Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Maassen A. Low-carbon Transitions and the Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure. Urban Stud. 2014;51:1471–86 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500089.

Caprotti F, Harmer N. Spatialising Urban Sustainability Transitions: Eco-cities, Multilevel Perspectives and the Political Ecology of Scale in the Bohai Rim, China. In: Frantzeskaki N, Broto VC, Coenen L, Loorbach D, editors. Urban Sustainability Transitions. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 2017

Castán Broto V. Contradiction, intervention, and urban low carbon transitions. Environ Plan Soc Space. 2015;0:0–0 https://doi.org/10.1068/d13050p.

Chatterton P. Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 2016;41:403–15 https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12139.

Cidell J, Prytherch D, editors. Transport, mobility, and the production of urban space. New York; London: Routledge; 2015.

CIHT. Manual for Streets 2. London: Chartered Institute of Highways & Transportation; 2010.

Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy. 2012;41:968–79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.

Coenen L, Truffer B. Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field. Eur Plan Stud. 2012;20:367–74 https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651802.

CROW. Aanbevelingen voor verkeersvoorzieningen binnen de bebouwde kom. Ede: CROW; 2012.

CROW. Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic. Utrecht: CROW; 2016.

Crozet Y, Santos G, Coledfy J. Shared Mobility, MaaS and the Regulatory Challenges of Urban Mobility. Brussels: Cerre | Centre on Regulation in Europe; 2019.

De Muelenaere M. Bruxelles a besoin de plus d’espace public: Le Soir; 2020. 15/05/2020. Available from: https://plus.lesoir.be/301215/article/2020-05-15/bruxelles-besoin-de-plus-despace-public.

EC DG MOVE. Support study on data collection and analysis of active modes use and infrastructure in Europe: Final Report. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport; 2017.

EC DG MOVE. Transport in the European Union: Current Trends and Issues. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport; 2019.

ECF. EU Cycling Strategy: Recommendations for Delivering Green Growth and an Effective Mobility System in 2030. Brussels: European Cyclists’ Federation; 2017.

ECF. Making Buildings Fit for Sustainable Mobility: Comparing Regulations for Off-Street Bicycle and Car Parking in Europe. Brussels: European Cyclists’ Federation; 2018.

Emanuel M. Monuments of Unsustainability: Planning, Path Dependence, and Cycling in Stockholm. In: Oldenziel R, Trischler H, editors. Cycling and Recycling. New York: Berghahn Books; 2016. p. 101–24.

Epprecht N, von Wirth T, Stünzi C, Blumer YB. Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes: How acceptability matters. Futures. 2014;60:30–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001.

EU. Urban Design for Sustainability: Final Report of the Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability to the European Union Expert Group on the Urban Environment. Vienna: EU Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability; 2004.

EU DG Mobility & Transport. European Urban Mobility: Policy Context. EU Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport: Directorate - Investment, Innovative & Sustainable Transport. Brussels: Unit B4 - Sustainable & Intelligent Transport; 2017.

EU Partnership on Urban Mobility (2017) Urban Agenda for the European Union: Orientation Paper.

Eurobarometer. Quality of Transport. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport; 2014.

European Parking Association. The Scope of Parking in Europe: Data Collection by the European Parking Association. Cologne: European Parking Association; 2013.

Fiorito R, Kollintzas T. Public goods, merit goods, and the relation between private and government consumption. Eur Econ Rev. 2004;48:1367–98.

Foster S, Iaione C. The city as a commons. Yale Law Policy Rev. 2016;34:281.

Frantzeskaki N, Broto VC, Coenen L, editors. Urban Sustainability Transitions, First Edition. New York: Routledge; 2017.

Geels F. The role of cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples, in: Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., Hodson, M., Marvin, S. (Eds.), Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. Routledge: Routledge Studies in Human Geography; 2010, pp. 29–44.

Geels FW. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2005;17:445–76 https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319.

Geels FW. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J Transp Geogr. 2012;24:471–82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021.

Geels FW, Dudley G, Kemp R. Findings, Conclusions and Assessments of Sustainability Transitions in Automobility. In: Geels FW, editor. Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. New York; London: Routledge; 2012. p. 335–73.

Gemeente Amsterdam (2016) Handboek Handhaving Fietsparkeren.

Gemeente Amsterdam. Meerjarenplan Fiets 2017–2022: Gemeente Amsterdam; 2017a.

Gemeente Amsterdam. Gemeente Amsterdam Nota Deelfiets (concept). Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam; 2017b.

Gemeente Amsterdam. Agenda Amsterdam Autoluw: Amsterdam maakt ruimte: Gemeente Amsterdam; 2019a.

Gemeente Amsterdam. Inrichtingsprincipes voor een autoluwe stad (Bijlage: Agenda Amsterdam Autoluw): Verkeer & Openbare Ruimte; 2019b.

Gemeente Amsterdam. Deelmobiliteit, kansen voor de stad: Beleid voor het delen van schone vervoermiddelen anders dan de auto: Verkeer & Openbare Ruimte; 2019c.

Ghosh D, Sengers F, Wieczorek AJ, et al. Urban mobility experiments in India and Thailand: Exp City Routledge Oxon; 2016. p. 122–36.

Gössling S, Choi AS. Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles. Ecol Econ. 2015;113:106–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.006.

Gössling S, Schröder M, Späth P, Freytag T. Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport. Transp Rev. 2016;36:659–79 https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101.

Groote JD, Ommeren JV, Koster HRA. Car ownership and residential parking subsidies: Evidence from Amsterdam. Econ Transp. 2016;6:25–37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2016.07.001.

Gunn S. Ring road: Birmingham and the collapse of the motor city ideal in 1970s Britain. Hist J. 2018;61:227–48.

Hamedinger A. The Mobility and/or Fixity of Urban and Planning Policies – The Role of Divergent Urban Planning Cultures. Eur Spat Res Policy. 2014;21:23–37 https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0003.

Hansen T, Coenen L. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2015;17:92–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.

Hebbert M. Engineering, Urbanism and the Struggle for Street Design. J Urban Des. 2005;10:39–59 https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500062361.

Heinen E, Buehler R. Bicycle parking: a systematic review of scientific literature on parking behaviour, parking preferences, and their influence on cycling and travel behaviour. Transp Rev. 2019:1–27 https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1590477.

Henderson J. The politics of mobility: De-essentializing automobility and contesting urban space. In: Conley J, Tigar McLaren A, editors. Car Troubles: Critical Studies of Automobility and Auto-Mobility. Burlington: Ashgate; 2009. p. 147–64.

Henderson J. From Climate Fight to Street Fight: The Politics of Mobility and the Right to the City. In: Cidell J, Prytherch D, editors. Transport, mobility, and the production of urban space. New York; London: Routledge; 2015. p. 101–16.

Henry A, Ermans T, de Smet d’Olbecke F. Un retour de la bicyclette, aussi à Bruxelles ? Bruss Stud. 2020;144. https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.4826.

Hirschhorn F, Paulsson A, Sørensen CH, Veeneman W. Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki. Transp Res Part Policy Pract. 2019;130:178–91.

Hodson M, Marvin S, Robinson B, Swilling M. Reshaping Urban Infrastructure: Material Flow Analysis and Transitions Analysis in an Urban Context. J Ind Ecol. 2012;16:789–800 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00559.x.

Hoffmann S, Weyer J, Longen J. Discontinuation of the automobility regime? An integrated approach to multi-level governance. Transp Res Part Policy Pract. 2017;103:391–408 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.016.

Hubert M, Corijn E, Neuwels J, et al. Du « grand piétonnier » au projet urbain : atouts et défis pour le centre-ville de Bruxelles: Note de synthèse BSI. Bruss Stud. 2017; https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1551.

ITDP. Europe’s Parking U-Turn: From Accommodation to Regulation. New York: Institute for Transportation & Development Policy; 2011.

Jensen JS, Lauridsen EH, Fratini CF, Hoffmann B. Harbour bathing and the urban transition of water in Copenhagen: junctions, mediators, and urban navigations. Environ Plan A. 2015;47:554–70.

Jones IH. Road Space Allocation: The Intersection of Transport Planning, Governance and Infrastructure; 2014.

Jones P. A comprehensive basis for determining the allocation of urban street space. In: 14th World Conference on Transport Research: Shanghai; 2016.

Latour B. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1987.

Lecy JD, Beatty KE. Representative literature reviews using constrained snowball sampling and citation network analysis. SSRN Electron J. 2012, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992601.

Levin-Keitel M, Mölders T, Othengrafen F, Ibendorf J. Sustainability Transitions and the Spatial Interface: Developing Conceptual Perspectives. Sustainability. 2018;10:1880 https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061880.

Longhurst J. Bike Battles: A History of Sharing the American Road. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 2015.

Loorbach DA. Governance of urban sustainability transitions. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2016.

Magalhães CD, Carmona M. Innovations in the Management of Public Space: Reshaping and Refocusing Governance. Plan Theory Pract. 2006;7:289–303 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350600841461.

Mäkinen K, Kivimaa P, Helminen V. Path creation for urban mobility transitions: Linking aspects of urban form to transport policy analysis. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 2015;26:485–504 https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2014-0115.

May X. The debate regarding the number of company cars in Belgium. Bruss Stud. 2017;8.

Mingardo G, van Wee B, Rye T. Urban parking policy in Europe: A conceptualization of past and possible future trends. Transp Res Part Policy Pract. 2015;74:268–81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.005.

Monstadt J. Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies. Environ Plan Econ Space. 2009;41:1924–42 https://doi.org/10.1068/a4145.

Mullen C, Tight M, Whiteing A, Jopson A. Knowing their place on the roads: What would equality mean for walking and cycling? Transp Res Part Policy Pract. 2014;61:238–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.009.

Nello-Deakin S. Is there such a thing as a ‘fair’ distribution of road space? J Urban Des. 2019:1–17 https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1592664.

Netherlands Government (2012) Integrale nota van toelichting van Bouwbesluit 2012.

Newman P, Kenworthy J. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1999.

Nielsen J, Farrelly MA. Conceptualising the built environment to inform sustainable urban transitions. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2019;33:231–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.07.001.

Nieuwstraten B. Fietsdelen in de regio Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Vervoerregio Amsterdam; 2019.

Nikolaeva A. From Constructed Scarcity and Mobility Austerity towards Mobility Commons? In: Living Mobil. Transit; 2017. http://livinginthemobilitytransition.forumviesmobiles.org/2016/11/23/from-constructed-scarcity-and-mobility-austerity-towards-mobility-commons/. Accessed 4 Jan 2017.

Norton PD. Fighting traffic: the dawn of the motor age in the American city. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2011.

Oldenziel R, de la Bruhèze AA. Contested spaces: Bicycle lanes in urban Europe, 1900–1995. Transfers. 2011;1:29–49.

Parker P, Johansson M. The uses and abuses of Elinor Ostrom’s concept of commons in urban theorizing; 2011a. p. 17.

Parker P, Johansson M. The uses and abuses of Elinor Ostrom’s concept of commons in urban theorizing. In: International Conference of the European Urban Research Association, Cities without Limits, 23–25 June 2011. Copenhagen; 2011b. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-10925.

Petzer BJM, Wieczorek AJ, Verbong GPJ. Making sense of Cycling-as-a-Service in the Netherlands: a combined business models and transitions approach. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.001.

Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A, FitzGerald S. From Space Immaterial: The Invisibility of the Lawscape. Griffith Law Rev. 2008;17:438–53 https://doi.org/10.1080/10383618.2008.10854618.

Prytherch D. Rules of the Road: Choreographing Mobility in the Everyday Intersection. In: Cidell J, Prytherch D, editors. Transport, mobility, and the production of urban space. New York; London: Routledge; 2015. p. 45–62.

Prytherch D. Law, Engineering, and the American right-of-way. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2018.

Pucher J, Buehler R. Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transp Rev. 2008;28:495–528 https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612.

Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F. Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2012;4:63–78 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001.

Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (2007) Brussels-Capital Region (bike): Titre II - Normes d’Habitabilite des Logements, Art. 17 (French). Ministère de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale Administration de l’Aménagement du Territoire et du Logement, Brussels.

Reid C. How a Belgian port city inspired Birmingham’s car-free ambitions. Guardian, vol. 2020; 2020a. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/20/how-a-belgian-port-city-inspired-birminghams-car-free-ambitions.

Reid C (2020b) Boost For Cycling And Walking In Birmingham’s Pandemic Emergency Transport Plan. Forbes, 14/05/2020. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2020/05/14/boost-for-cycling-and-walking-in-birminghams-post-pandemic-emergency-transport-plan/#6d874e017fae.

Rohracher H, Späth P. From Building Small Urban Spaces for a Car-Free life to Challenging The Global Regime of Automobility: Cases from Vienna and Freiburg. In: Urban Sustainability Transitions, First Edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017a.

Rohracher H, Späth P. Cities as Arenas of Low-Carbon Transitions: Friction Zones in the Negotiation of Low-Carbon Futures. In: Urban Sustainability Transitions, First Edition. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017b.

Schilling MA. Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23:267–84.

Schipper F. Driving Europe: Building Europe on roads in the twentieth century. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2008.

Schipper F, Schot J. Infrastructural Europeanism, or the project of building Europe on infrastructures: an introduction. Hist Technol. 2011;27:245–64 https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2011.604166.

Sengers F, Raven R. Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of Bus Rapid Transit. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2015;17:166–82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.003.

Sheller M, Urry J. Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Appl Mobilities. 2016;1:10–25 https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216.

Shill GH. Should Law Subsidize Driving? University of Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper Series. University of Iowa College of Law; 2019. http://ssrn.com/abstract=3345366.

Shoup D. The high cost of free parking. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011.

Shoup D. The high cost of free parking: Updated edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2017.

Spinney J. Fixing Mobility in the Neoliberal City: Cycling Policy and Practice in London as a Mode of Political–Economic and Biopolitical Governance. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2016;106:450–8.

Spurling N. Dormant vehicles: Inverting urban mobility futures. Land Use Policy. 2019:S026483771831367X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.031.

UK DfT. Manual for Streets. London: Telford; 2007.

UN (1968) Vienna Convention on Road Traffic (amended 1993, 2006).

UN Habitat (2013) Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Policy Directions: Global Report on Human Settlements.

Urry J. The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory Cult Soc. 2004;21:25–39 https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059.

van der Spek SC, Scheltema N. The importance of bicycle parking management. Res Transp Bus Manag. 2015;15:39–49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.001.

Van Zeebroeck B, Charles J. Impact et potentiel de l’usage du vélo sur l’économie et l’emploi en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Les effets directs et indirects de l’usage du vélo en 2002, 2012 et 2020. Brussels: Pro Velo R&D; 2014.

Velo P. Observation du vélo en région de Bruxelles Capitale: Comptages et analyse des données, Rapport 2017. Brussels: Pro Velo; 2017.

Verkade T (2019) Het is tijd om de straat terug te geven aan fietsers en voetgangers. De Correspondent, 14/01/2019. Available at: https://decorrespondent.nl/8777/het-is-tijd-om-de-straat-terug-te-geven-aan-fietsers-en-voetgangers/4274968021687-51ad45e6.

von Schönfeld KC, Bertolini L. Urban streets: Epitomes of planning challenges and opportunities at the interface of public space and mobility. Cities. 2017;68:48–55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.012.

Ward K, Jonas AE, Miller B, Wilson D. The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge; 2018.

Wells P, Xenias D. From ‘freedom of the open road’ to ‘cocooning’: Understanding resistance to change in personal private automobility. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2015;16:106–19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.001.

Whitmarsh L. How useful is the Multi-Level Perspective for transport and sustainability research? J Transp Geogr. 2012;24:483–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.022.

Wieczorek AJ, Raven R, Berkhout F. Transnational linkages in sustainability experiments: A typology and the case of solar photovoltaic energy in India. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2015;17:149–65.

Wolfram, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Maschmeyer, S., 2016. Cities, systems and sustainability: status and perspectives of research on urban transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.014.

Yin RK. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.

Zijlstra T, Avelino F. A Socio-Spatial Perspective on the Car Regime. In: Geels FW, Kemp R, Dudley G, Lyons G, editors. Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. London: Routledge; 2012.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 3

1-24

Thông tin tác giả