Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki

Audouin, 2018, The development of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Helsinki metropolitan area: a multi-level governance analysis, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 27, 24, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.09.001 Avelino, 2017, Power in sustainability transitions: analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability, Environ. Policy Gov., 27, 505, 10.1002/eet.1777 Banister, 2008, The sustainable mobility paradigm, Transp. Policy, 15, 73, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005 Berkeley, 2017, Assessing the transition towards battery electric vehicles: a multi-level perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 106, 320, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.004 Bevir, 2013 Bevir, 2016, The ‘3Rs’ in rethinking governance: Ruling, rationalities, and resistance Centro, 2014. Information about public transport expenditure in the West Midlands [WWW Document]. URL https://www.dudley.gov.uk/media/6666/centro-2014.pdf. Datson, J., 2016. Exploring the Opportunity for Mobility as a Service in the UK. Milton Keynes. de Haan, 2018, A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 128, 275, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017 Docherty, 2018, The governance of smart mobility, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 115, 114, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012 Durand, A., Harms, L., Hoogendoorn-lanser, S., Zijlstra, T., 2018. Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review. KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, 2017. Letter of Invitation to MaaS Market Consultation from November 2017. European Metropolitan Transport Authorities, 2018. Barometer 2016. European Metropolitan Transport Authorities, 2017. Barometer 2015. European Metropolitan Transport Authorities, 2009. Barometer 2006. Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inq., 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363 Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Res. Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010 Geels, 2018, Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical multi-level analysis of unfolding trajectories in Great Britain’s passenger mobility system (1990–2016), Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 46, 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008 Geels, 2014, Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective, Theory, Cult. Soc., 31, 21, 10.1177/0263276414531627 Geels, 2012, A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, J. Transp. Geogr., 24, 471, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021 Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 George, 2005 Guba, 1994, Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, 105 Hansson, 2013, Hybrid steering cultures in the governance of public transport: A successful way to meet demands?, Res. Transp. Econ., 39, 175, 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.011 Hensher, 2017, Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change?, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 98, 86, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.02.006 Héritier, 2002, New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without legislating?, 185 Hoffmann, 2017, Discontinuation of the automobility regime? An integrated approach to multi-level governance, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 103, 391, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.016 House of Commons Transport Committee, 2019. Bus services in England outside London: Ninth Report of Session 2017–19. HSL, 2018a. HSL to make mobile tickets available via OpenMaaS sales interface on 2 April 2018 [WWW Document]. URL https://www.hsl.fi/en/news/2018/hsl-make-mobile-tickets-available-openmaas-sales-interface-2-april-2018-14846 (Accessed 10.15.18). HSL, 2018b. HRT:s styrelsebeslut 6.3.2018 (HSL Board Decision) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.hsl.fi/sv/nyheter/2018/hrts-styrelsebeslut-632018-14719 (Accessed 10.15.18). HSL, 2018c. HRT:s styrelsebeslut 29.5.2018 (HSL Board Decision) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.hsl.fi/sv/nyheter/2018/hrts-styrelsebeslut-2952018-15360 (Accessed 10.15.18). HSL, 2017a. Liikenteen uudet teknologiat ja palvelut HSL Helsingin seudun liikenne. Helsinki. HSL, 2017b. HSL:n rooli osana liikkumispalveluja. Tausta-aineisto lausuntopyyntöön [WWW Document]. URL http://hsl01.hosting.documenta.fi/kokous/2017476-2-2.PDF (Accessed 12.21.18). Jessop, 2002 Johnstone, 2018, Sustainability transitions and the state, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 27, 72, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.006 Kamargianni, 2016, A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport, Transp. Res. Procedia, 14, 3294, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277 Kemp, 2011, Transition management as a model for sustainable mobility, Eur. Transp./Trasporti Eur., 47, 25 Kingsley, D., Urry, J., 2009. After the Car. Polity, Cambridge. Klijn, 2000, Public management and policy networks, An Int. J. Res. Theory, 2, 135 Koppenjan, 2004 LVM, 2017. The Act on Transport Services implements Government Programme (Factsheet 64/2017). Lyons, 2019, The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 121, 22, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.010 MaaS Global, 2016. Helsinki takes another pioneering step in mobility services: HRT public transport added to the Whim mobility app [WWW Document]. URL https://maas.global/helsinki-takes-another-pioneering-step-in-mobility-services-hrt-public-transport-added-to-the-whim-mobility-app/ (Accessed 10.15.18). Marsden, 2017, Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 101, 238, 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008 Marsden, 2010, The governance of transport and climate change, J. Transp. Geogr., 18, 669, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.014 2017 MuConsult, 2017. White Paper Mobility as a Service. Mulley, 2017, Mobility as a services (MaaS)–does it have critical mass?, Transp. Rev., 37, 247, 10.1080/01441647.2017.1280932 Mulley, 2018, Workshop 7 report: the “uberisation” of public transport and mobility as a service (MaaS): implications for future mainstream public transport, Res. Transp. Econ., 69, 568, 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.08.007 Mulley, 2018, Community transport meets mobility as a service: On the road to a new a flexible future, Res. Transp. Econ., 69, 583, 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.02.004 Nykvist, 2008, A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: niche development in the UK and Sweden, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 75, 1373, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006 OECD, 2018. Blockchain and Beyond: Encoding 21 st Century Transport. Paris. Parkhurst, 2012, Intermodal personal mobility: a niche caught between two regimes, 308 Peters, 2016 Schwanen, 2011, Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 45, 993, 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005 Sheller, 2000, The city and the car, Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 24, 737, 10.1111/1468-2427.00276 Smith, 2005, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Res. Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 Smith, 2010, Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Res. Policy, 39, 435, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 Smith, 2018, Mobility as a Service: Development scenarios and implications for public transport, Res. Transp. Econ., 69, 592, 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.04.001 Sørensen, 2017, Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks, Am. Rev. Public Adm., 47, 826, 10.1177/0275074016643181 Sørensen, 2009, Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance, Public Adm., 87, 234, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x Sovacool, 2018, Functional, symbolic and societal frames for automobility: implications for sustainability transitions, Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 118, 730, 10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.008 Sovacool, 2017, Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change, Soc. Stud. Sci., 47, 703, 10.1177/0306312717709363 Sperling, 2018 Stadsregio Amsterdam, 2016. Programma van Eisen Concessie Amstelland-Meerlanden 2018. Stoker, 1998, Governance as theory: five propositions, Int. Soc. Sci. J., 50, 17, 10.1111/1468-2451.00106 Svensson, 2018, Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory, Res. Policy, 47, 462, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.007 Treib, 2007, Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification, J. Eur. Public Policy, 14, 1, 10.1080/135017606061071406 Urry, 2004, The ‘System’ of Automobility, Theory, Cult. Soc., 21, 25, 10.1177/0263276404046059 Vervoerregio Amsterdam, 2017. Beleidskader Mobiliteit. Amsterdam. West Midlands Combined Authority, 2018. Expenditure in the West Midlands 2018-19 [WWW Document]. URL https://www.wmca.org.uk/media/2190/expenditure-leaflet-2018.pdf. Wittmayer, 2017, Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, 24, 45, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003 Yin, 2017