Recent Advances in Contaminated Site Remediation
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chapman, S. W., & Parker, B. L. (2005). Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation. Water Resources Research, 41, W12411. doi:10.1029/2005WR004224.
Davis, G. B. (1997). Site clean-up—the pros and cons of disposal and in situ and ex situ remediation. Journal of Land Contamination and Reclamation, 5(4), 287–290.
Davis, G.B., Johnston, C.D. (2004). Australian and international research and its implications for the risk based assessment and remediation of groundwater contamination. Enviro 04: Managing Contaminated Land, Sydney, 28 March-1 April 2004, Paper No. e4335, 12p.
DTZ. 2010. Bioaccessibility Testing of Contaminated Land for Threats to Human Health: Summary of Impacts. Report prepared for the Natural Environment Research Council. http://www.nerc.ac.uk/business/casestudies/documents/bioaccessibility-report.pdf
Falta, R.W. (2005). Dissolved chemical discharge from fractured clay aquitards contaminated with DNPALs Dynamic of Fluids and Transport in Fractured Rock. Geophysical Monograph, 162, (pp. 165–174). New York: American Geophysical Union.
Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B.K., Jensen, J., Kasamas, H., Urzelai, A., & Vegter, J. (Editors). (1998). Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe. Volume 1. Scientific Basis. LQM Press, Nottingham. http://www.commonforum.eu/Documents/DOC/Caracas/caracas_publ1.pdf
Krembs, F. J., Siegrist, R. L., Crimi, M. L., Furrer, R. F., & Petri, B. G. (2010). ISCO for groundwater remediation: analysis of field applications and performance. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 30, 42–53.
Naidu, R., Kookana, R. S., Oliver, D., Rogers, S., & McLaughlin, M. J. (1996). Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia-Pacific region. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Patterson, B. M., & Davis, G. B. (2008). An in situ device to measure oxygen in the vadose zone and in groundwater: laboratory testing and field evaluation. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation, 28, 68–74.
Sarkar, B., Xi, Y., Megharaj, M., Krishnamurti, G. S. R., Bowman, M., Rose, H., & Naidu, R. (2012b). Bioreactive organoclay: a new technology for environmental remediation. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 435–488.
Singh, B., & Naidu, R. (2012). Cleaning contaminated environment: a growing challenge. Biodegradation, 23(6), 785–786. doi:10.1007/s10532-012-9590-5.
Singh, I. B., Chturveth, K., & Yegneswaran, A. H. (2007). Thermal immobilization of Cr, Cu and Zn of galvanising wastes in the presence of clay and fly ash. Environmental Technology, 28, 713–721.
USEPA. (1989). Evaluation of groundwater extraction remedies, 1–2. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Responses.
Warner, S.D. (2011). PRB for Contaminated Groundwater,” The Military Engineer, Society of American Military Engineers, Volume 104, No, 675, Page 53–54, January-February 2012
Warner, S. D. (2012). Permeable Reactive Barriers: advancing natural in-situ remediation for treatment of radionuclides in groundwater, radwaste solutions. American Nuclear Society, 18(14), 2011.
Warner, S.D., Yamane C.L., Bice, N.T., Szerdy, F.S., Vogan, J., Major, D.W., Hankins D.A. (1994). The First Commercial Permeable Treatment Zone for VOCs. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated