In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics - Tập 78 - Trang 1839-1860 - 2016
Alessandra S. Souza1, Klaus Oberauer1
1Department of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

The concept of attention has a prominent place in cognitive psychology. Attention can be directed not only to perceptual information, but also to information in working memory (WM). Evidence for an internal focus of attention has come from the retro-cue effect: Performance in tests of visual WM is improved when attention is guided to the test-relevant contents of WM ahead of testing them. The retro-cue paradigm has served as a test bed to empirically investigate the functions and limits of the focus of attention in WM. In this article, we review the growing body of (behavioral) studies on the retro-cue effect. We evaluate the degrees of experimental support for six hypotheses about what causes the retro-cue effect: (1) Attention protects representations from decay, (2) attention prioritizes the selected WM contents for comparison with a probe display, (3) attended representations are strengthened in WM, (4) not-attended representations are removed from WM, (5) a retro-cue to the retrieval target provides a head start for its retrieval before decision making, and (6) attention protects the selected representation from perceptual interference. The extant evidence provides support for the last four of these hypotheses.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Astle, D. E., Nobre, A. C., & Scerif, G. (2012). Attentional control constrains visual short-term memory: Insights from developmental and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 277–294. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.492622

Astle, D. E., Summerfield, J., Griffin, I., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 146–162. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3

Backer, K. C., & Alain, C. (2012). Orienting attention to sound object representations attenuates change deafness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1554–1566.

Backer, K. C., Binns, M. A., & Alain, C. (2015). Neural dynamics underlying attentional orienting to auditory representations in short-term memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1307–1318.

Bays, P. M. (2014). Noise in neural populations accounts for errors in working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 3632–3645.

Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 7:1–11. doi:10.1167/9.10.7

Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851–854. doi:10.1126/science.1158023

Beck, M. R., & van Lamsweerde, A. E. (2011). Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection. Memory & Cognition, 39, 433–446. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0033-4

Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 426–438.

Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.539

Brown, G. D. A., Sala, S. D., Foster, J. K., & Vousden, J. I. (2007). Amnesia, rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness models of recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 256–260.

Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228.

Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012

Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427

Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Memory: Enduring traces of perceptual and reflective attention. Neuron, 72, 520–535.

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005

Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 51–57. doi:10.1177/0963721409359277

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

Delvenne, J.-F., Cleeremans, A., & Laloyaux, C. (2010). Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention. Experimental Psychology, 57, 108–116. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000014

Delvenne, J.-F., & Holt, J. L. (2012). Splitting attention across the two visual fields in visual short-term memory. Cognition, 122, 258–263.

Duarte, A., Hearons, P., Jiang, Y., Delvin, M. C., Newsome, R. N., & Verhaeghen, P. (2013). Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 50, 465–476.

Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Removal of information from working memory: A specific updating process. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 77–90. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.003

Ecker, U. K. H., Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Working memory updating involves item-specific removal. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.006

Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.269

Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2010). Computational models as aids to better reasoning in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 329–335.

Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276. doi:10.3758/BF03201138

Gazzaley, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014

Gilchrist, A. L., Duarte, A., & Verhaeghen, P. (2016). Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition, Section B, 23, 184–195. doi:10.1080/13825585.2015.1069253

Gorgoraptis, N., Catalao, R. F. G., Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2011). Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8502–8511. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-11.2011

Gözenman, F., Tanoue, R. T., Metoyer, T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2014). Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1748–1754.

Gressmann, M., & Janczyk, M. (2016). The (un)clear effects of invalid retro-cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 244. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244

Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194. doi:10.1162/089892903322598139

Gunseli, E., van Moorselaar, D., Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1334–1341. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x

Heuer, A., & Schubö, A. (2016). Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0584-5

Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 388–403. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.388

Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1047–1058. doi:10.1037/a0030238

Irwin, D. E., & Thomas, L. E. (2008). Visual sensory memory. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 9–41). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Janczyk, M., & Berryhill, M. E. (2014). Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: Decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 715–724. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0615-x

Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 268–280. doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.268

Katus, T., Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2012a). Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention. Biological Psychology, 89, 39–46. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.09.001

Katus, T., Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2012b). Nonspatial cueing of tactile STM causes shift of spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1596–1609. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00234

Katus, T., Andersen, S. K., & Müller, M. M. (2014). Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: A tactile dual-task study. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 707–718. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs350

Kessler, Y., Rac-Lubashevsky, R., Lichtstein, C., Markus, H., Simchon, A., & Moscovitch, M. (2015). Updating visual working memory in the change detection paradigm. Journal of Vision, 15(9), 18. doi:10.1167/15.9.18

Kuo, B.-C., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 51–60. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00087

Kuo, B.-C., Yeh, Y.-Y., Chen, A. J.-W., & D’Esposito, M. (2011). Functional connectivity during top-down modulation of visual short-term memory representations. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1589–1596.

Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00402-9

Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2004). The role of figure–ground segregation in change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 254–261.

LaRocque, J. J., Eichenbaum, A. S., Starrett, M. J., Rose, N. S., Emrich, S. M., & Postle, B. R. (2015). The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention. Memory & Cognition, 43, 453–468. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0486-y

LaRocque, J. J., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2013). Decoding attended information in short-term memory: An EEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 127–142. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00305

Lawrence, M. A. (2010). Estimating the probability and fidelity of memory. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 957–968. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.4.957

Lepsien, J., Griffin, I. C., Devlin, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load. NeuroImage, 26, 733–743. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.026

Lepsien, J., & Nobre, A. C. (2007). Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2072–2083. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl116

Lepsien, J., Thornton, I., & Nobre, A. C. (2011). Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1569–1577. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.011

Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Drysdale, A. T., Oberauer, K., & Postle, B. R. (2012). Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 61–79.

Li, Q., & Saiki, J. (2014). The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 965. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00965

Li, Q., & Saiki, J. (2015). Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 450–463. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0775-3

Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846

Makovski, T. (2012). Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 470–476. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0235-9

Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2007). Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1072–1078. doi:10.3758/BF03193093

Makovski, T., & Pertzov, Y. (2015). Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1735–1743. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1049623

Makovski, T., Sussman, R., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 369–380. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.369

Makovski, T., Watson, L. M., Koutstaal, W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Method matters: Systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1466–1479. doi:10.1037/a0020851

Matsukura, M., Cosman, J. D., Zachary, J. J. R., Vatterott, D. B., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Location-specific effects of attention during visual short-term memory maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1103–1116.

Matsukura, M., Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1422–1434. doi:10.3758/BF03192957

Matsukura, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2015). Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1625–1646.

Matthey, L., Bays, P. M., & Dayan, P. (2015). A probabilistic palimpsest model of visual short-term memory. PLoS Computational Biology, 11, e1004003. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004003

Maxcey, A. M., Fukuda, K., Song, W. S., & Woodman, G. F. (2015). Using electrophysiology to demonstrate that cueing affects long-term memory storage over the short term. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1349–1357.

Maxcey-Richard, A. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2013). The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 760–772. doi:10.1037/a0029496

McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 817–835. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.817

Mercer, T. (2014). The loss of short-term visual representations over time: Decay or temporal distinctiveness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2281–2288.

Morey, C. C., & Bieler, M. (2013). Visual short-term memory always requires general attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 163–170.

Murray, A. M., Nobre, A. C., Clark, I. A., Cravo, A. M., & Stokes, M. G. (2013). Attention restores discrete items to visual short-term memory. Psychological Science, 24, 550–556.

Myers, N. E., Walther, L., Wallis, G., Stokes, M. G., & Nobre, A. C. (2015). Temporal dynamics of attention during encoding versus maintenance of working memory: Complementary views from event-related potentials and alpha-band oscillations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 492–508. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00727

Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2011). Dissociable contributions of prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus to short-term memory: Evidence for a 3-state model of memory. NeuroImage, 54, 1540–1548.

Nobre, A. C., Griffin, I. C., & Rao, A. (2008). Spatial attention can bias search in visual short-term memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1(4), 1–9. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.004.2007

Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 948–957. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.948

Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.411

Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257–269.

Oberauer, K. (2005). Control of the contents of working memory—A comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 714–728. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.714

Oberauer, K. (2013). The focus of attention in working memory: From metaphors to mechanisms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 673. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673

Oberauer, K., & Hein, L. (2012). Attention to information in working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 164–169.

Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 157–211.

Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

Pertzov, Y., Bays, P. M., Joseph, S., & Husain, M. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1224–1231. doi:10.1037/a0030947

Pinto, Y., Sligte, I. G., Shapiro, K. L., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2013). Fragile visual short-term memory is an object-based and location-specific store. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 732–739. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0393-4

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231

Prinzmetal, W., Amiri, H., Allen, K., & Edwards, T. (1998). Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 261–282. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.261

Purcell, B. A., Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. Psychological Review, 117, 1113–1143. doi:10.1037/a0020311

Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922. doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420

Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067

Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135125

Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1075–1096. doi:10.1037/a0031172

Rerko, L., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & Cognition, 42, 712–728. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8

Ricker, T. J., & Cowan, N. (2010). Loss of visual working memory within seconds: The combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1355–1368.

Ricker, T. J., & Cowan, N. (2014). Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: A matter of working memory consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 417–428.

Ricker, T. J., Spiegel, L. R., & Cowan, N. (2014). Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1510–1523.

Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2011). How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 324–330.

Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 754–763. doi:10.3758/BF03194742

Schneider, D., Mertes, C., & Wascher, E. (2015). On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm. Behavioural Brain Research, 293, 114–124.

Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2006). Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 38–45.

Shimi, A., Nobre, A. C., Astle, D. E., & Scerif, G. (2014). Orienting attention within visual short-term memory: Development and mechanisms. Child Development, 85, 578–592.

Shipstead, Z., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 277–289. doi:10.1037/a0028467

Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PLoS ONE, 3, e1699. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001699

Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2009). V4 activity predicts the strength of visual short-term memory representations. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7432–7438. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0784-09.2009

Sligte, I. G., Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 175. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00175

Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2015). Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 156–162.

Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., Lin, H.-Y., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Focused attention improves working memory: Implications for flexible-resource and discrete-capacity models. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2080–2102.

Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Unloading and reloading working memory: Attending to one item frees capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1237–1256.

Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2015). Refreshing memory traces: Thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339, 20–31.

Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0036331

Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11, Whole No. 498), 1–29.

Stokes, M. G. (2015). “Activity-silent” working memory in prefrontal cortex: A dynamic coding framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 394–405.

Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.

Swan, G., & Wyble, B. (2014). The binding pool: A model of shared neural resources for distinct items in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2136–2157.

Tamber-Rosenau, B. J., Esterman, M., Chiu, Y.-C., & Yantis, S. (2011). Cortical mechanisms of cognitive control for shifting attention in vision and working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2905–2919.

Tanoue, R. T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2012). The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1199–1215.

Teodorescu, A. R., & Usher, M. (2013). Disentangling decision models: From independence to competition. Psychological Review, 120, 1–38. doi:10.1037/a0030776

Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3

Trapp, S., & Lepsien, J. (2012). Attentional orienting to mnemonic representations: Reduction of load-sensitive maintenance-related activity in the intraparietal sulcus. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2805–2811.

Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.757

van den Berg, R., Shin, H., Chou, W.-C., George, R., & Ma, W. J. (2012). Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8780–8785.

van Moorselaar, D., Gunseli, E., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1053. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01053

van Moorselaar, D., Olivers, C. N. L., Theeuwes, J., Lamme, V. A. F., & Sligte, I. G. (2015). Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1755–1763.

Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Sligte, I. G., de Vries, J. G., Cohen, M. X., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). Neural correlates of visual short-term memory dissociate between fragile and working memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 2477–2490.

Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Sligte, I. G., Fahrenfort, J. J., Ambroziak, K. B., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2012). Non-attended representations are perceptual rather than unconscious in nature. PLoS ONE, 7, e50042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050042

Vandenbroucke, A. R. E., Sligte, I. G., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2011). Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1559–1568.

Wallis, G., Stokes, M., Cousijn, H., Woolrich, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2015). Frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks play dissociable roles in control of working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 2019–2034.

Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.48

Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 11:1120–1135. doi:10.1167/4.12.11

Williams, M., Hong, S. W., Kang, M.-S., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2013). The benefit of forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 348–355. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0354-3

Williams, M., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1206–1220.

Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Yantis, S. (2008). The neural basis of selective attention cortical sources and targets of attentional modulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 86–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00554.x

Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235. doi:10.1038/nature06860

Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02322.x

Zokaei, N., Manohar, S., Husain, M., & Feredoes, E. (2014). Causal evidence for a privileged working memory state in early visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 158–162. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-13.2014

Zokaei, N., Ning, S., Manohar, S., Feredoes, E., & Husain, M. (2014). Flexibility of representational states in working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 853. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00853

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

Tập 78

1839-1860

Thông tin tác giả