Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening - Tập 40 - Trang 4-16 - 2019
Stephan Pauleit1,2, Bianca Ambrose-Oji3, Erik Andersson4, Barbara Anton5, Arjen Buijs6, Dagmar Haase7,8, Birgit Elands6, Rieke Hansen1,9, Ingo Kowarik10,11, Jakub Kronenberg12, Thomas Mattijssen2,13, Anton Stahl Olafsson2, Emily Rall1, Alexander P.N. van der Jagt14,15, Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch16
1Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences, Chair for Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Emil-Ramann-Str. 6, 85354 Freising, Germany
2University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
3Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Forest Research, Alice Holt, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, England, United Kingdom
4Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 9A, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
5ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability, European Secretariat, Leopoldring 3, 79098 Freiburg, Germany
6Wageningen University & Research, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
7Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Geography, Rudower Chaussee 16, 12489 Berlin, Germany
8Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoser Str. 15, 04275 Leipzig, Germany
9RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Landscape Architecture, Jakobstr. 2, 52056 Aachen, Germany
10Technische Universität Berlin, Department of Ecology, Ecosystem Science/Plant Ecology, Rothenburgstr. 12, D-12165 Berlin, Germany
11Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), D-14195 Berlin, Germany
12University of Lodz, Department of Regional Economics and the Environment, POW 3/5 90-255 Lodz, Poland
13Wageningen Economic Research, Prinses Beatrixlaan 582, 2595 BM The Hague, the Netherlands
14Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Bush Estate, Roslin EH25 9SY, United Kingdom
15Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands
16University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Resources Management, 2045 - 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahern, 2007, Green infrastructure for cities. The spatial dimension, 267

Ambrose-Oji, 2017

Andersson, 2014, Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services, Ambio, 43, 445, 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y

Andersson, 2015

Andersson, 2016

Andersson, 2017, Stewardship in urban landscapes, 222

Andersson, 2017, Double insurance in dealing with extremes: ecological and social factors for making nature-based solutions last, 51

Aronson, 2017, Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 189, 10.1002/fee.1480

Bellamy, 2017, A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: a route to healthy, blossoming communities?, Environ. Res., 158, 255, 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023

Benedict, 2006

Botzat, 2016, Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation, Glob. Environ. Change, 39, 220, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008

Brengman, 2012, The impact of in-store greenery on customers, Psychol. Mark., 29, 807, 10.1002/mar.20566

Buijs, 2018, Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective, Urban For. Urban Green.

Buijs, 2016

Buijs, 2016, Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure. Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 22, 1, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002

Buizer, 2015, The governance of urban green spaces in selected EU-cities

Buizer, 2016, Governing cities reflexively—the biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services, Environ. Sci. Policy, 62, 7, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003

Butterworth, 2011, SWITCH in the City

Byrne, 2009, Can urban greenspace combat climate change? Towards a subtropical cities research agenda, Aust. Plan., 46, 36, 10.1080/07293682.2009.10753420

Cocks, 2016, Ways of belonging: meanings of “nature” among Xhosa-speaking township residents in South Africa, J. Ethnobiol., 36, 820, 10.2993/0278-0771-36.4.820

Colding, 2007, ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems, Landsc. Urban Plan., 81, 46, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016

Cvejić, 2015

Czembrowski, 2016, Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services, Landsc. Urban Plan., 146, 11, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005

Czembrowski, 2016, Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing, Ecol. Econ., 130, 166, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.004

Czembrowski, 2016, Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price: integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces, Urban For. Urban Green., 20, 89, 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.010

Davies, 2015

Dodson, 2009, The “Infrastructure turn” in Australian metropolitan spatial planning, Int. Plan. Stud., 14, 109, 10.1080/13563470903021100

EEA, 2017

Elands, 2015, Policy interpretations and manifestations of biocultural diversity in urbanized Europe: conservation of lived biodiversity, Biodivers. Conserv., 24, 3347, 10.1007/s10531-015-0985-6

Elands, 2018, Biocultural diversity: a novel concept to assess human-nature interrelations, nature conservation and stewardship in cities, Urban For. Urban Green.

2018

Elmqvist, 2015, Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 14, 101, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001

European Commission, 2013

European Commission, 2015

Feltynowski, 2018, Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data, Urban For. Urban Green., 31, 56, 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003

Fischer, 2018, Biodiverse edible schools: linking healthy food, school gardens and local urban biodiversity, Urban For. Urban Green.

Fischer, 2018, Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: sociocultural and geographic context matters for park use, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 455, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.015

Fischer, 2018, Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities, Glob. Environ. Change, 49, 35, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.001

Fuller, 2009, The scaling of green space coverage in European cities, Biol. Lett., 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0010

Grădinaru, 2018, Green infrastructure in strategic spatial plans: evidence from European urban regions, Urban For. Urban Green.

Guerrero, 2016, Revealing cultural ecosystem services through Instagram images: the potential of social media volunteered geographic information for urban green infrastructure planning and governance, Urban Plan., 1, 1, 10.17645/up.v1i2.609

Haase, 2017, Greening cities – to be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities, Habitat Int., 64, 41, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005

Haase, 2016

Haase, 2014, A quantitative review of urban ecosystem services assessment: concepts, models and implementation, AMBIO, 43, 413, 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0

Hansen, 2016, Advanced Urban Green infrastructure planning and implementation

Hansen, 2017, Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities. What is the state of practice?, Ecol. Indic.

2017

Hubacek, 2013, Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services, Landsc. Urban Plan., 109, 1, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010

Jayasooriya, 2014, Tools for modeling of stormwater management and economics of green infrastructure practices: a review, Water Air Soil Pollut., 225, 2055, 10.1007/s11270-014-2055-1

Kabisch, 2012, Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006, Landsc. Urban Plan., 110, 113, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.017

Kabisch, 2014, Urban nature: human-environment interactions in urban green spaces – contemporary issues and future prospects, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 50, 25, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007

Kabisch, 2016, Green space availability in European cities, Ecol. Indic., 70, 586, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029

Kabisch, 2016, Adding natural spaces to social indicators of intra-urban health inequalities among children - a case study from Berlin, Germany, IJERPH, 13, 783, 10.3390/ijerph13080783

Kambites, 2006, Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK, Plan. Pract. Res., 21, 483, 10.1080/02697450601173413

Koc, 2017, Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies, Urban Ecosyst., 20, 15, 10.1007/s11252-016-0578-5

Kowarik, 2018, Understanding plant species success across urban ecosystems – a framework to inform urban biodiversity conservation, J. Appl. Ecol., 55, 2354, 10.1111/1365-2664.13144

Kronenberg, 2015, Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services, Ecosyst. Serv., 12, 218, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002

Kronenberg, 2016

Kronenberg, 2017, Guide to valuation and integration of different valuation methods

Lin, 2013, Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world’s cities?, J. Appl. Ecol., 50, 1161, 10.1111/1365-2664.12118

Luz, 2018, Biocultural diversity – a framework on the urban setting, Urban For. Urban Green.

Martín-López, 2014, Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment, Ecol. Indic., 37, 220, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003

Matthews, 2015, Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners, Landsc. Urban Plan., 138, 155, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010

Mattijssen, 2018, The green and self in green self-governance: a study of 264 green citizen initiatives, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 20, 96, 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1322945

Mattijssen, 2017, The long-term prospects of citizens managing urban green space: from place making to place keeping?, Urban For. Urban Green., 26, 78, 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.015

McPhearson, 2016, Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities, Bioscience, 66, 198, 10.1093/biosci/biw002

Mell, 2016

Møller, 2018, Participation through place-based e-tools: a valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance?, Urban For. Urban Green.

Pauleit, 2017, Urban landscapes and Green infrastructure

Pauleit, 2011, Multifunctional green infrastructure planning to promote ecological services in the city, 272

Püffel, 2018, Mapping Ecosystem Services on Brownfields in Leipzig, Germany, Ecosyst. Serv., 30, 73, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.011

Rall, 2017, Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use, Ecol. Indic., 77, 80, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001

Rall, 2018, The added value of public participation GIS, PPGIS for urban green infrastructure planning, Urban For. Urban Green.

Rall, 2015, A comparative exploration of uptake and potential application of ecosystem services in urban planning, Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 230, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.005

Reil, 2017

Rolf, 2018, A stakeholder approach, door opener for farmland and multifunctionality in Urban Green Infrastructure, Urban For. Urban Green.

Rouse, 2013

2008, GREENKEYS @ Your City

Smith, 2015

Soga, 2016, Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions, Front. Ecol. Environ., 14, 94, 10.1002/fee.1225

Sugiyama, 2009, Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain, Environ. Behav., 41, 3, 10.1177/0013916507311688

Tyrväinen, 1998, The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method, Landsc. Urban Plan., 43, 105, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00103-0

Tzoulas, 2007, Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review, Landsc. Urban Plan., 81, 167, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

UNEP, 2011

Van der Jagt, 2015

Van der Jagt, 2016, Participatory governance of urban green spaces: trends and practices in the EU, Nord. J. Archit. Research, 28, 11

Van der Jagt, 2018, Co-creating urban green infrastructure connecting people and nature: a guiding framework and approach, J. Environ. Manage.

Van der Jagt, 2017

Van der Jagt, 2017, Cultivating nature-based solutions: the governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union, Environ. Res., 159, 264, 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013

Van der Jagt, 2017, Cultivating nature-based solutions: lessons from communal urban gardening in the EU, Environ. Res., 159, 264, 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013

Van Herk, 2011, Learning and Action Alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: a new framework from empirical evidence from the Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Policy, 14, 543, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006

Van Oudenhoven, 2012, Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services, Ecol. Indic., 21, 110, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012

Verhagen, 2008, Learning alliances for integrated and sustainable innovations in urban water management, Waterlines, 27, 116, 10.3362/1756-3488.2008.014

Vierikko, 2016, Considering the ways biocultural diversity helps enforce the urban green infrastructure in times of urban transformation, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 22, 7, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.006

Vierikko, 2017

Voigt, 2014, Structural diversity as a key factor for the provision of recreational services in urban parks – a new and straightforward method for assessment, Ambio, 43, 480, 10.1007/s13280-014-0508-9

Weber, 2014, Zooming into the urban heat island: How do urban built and green structures influence earth surface temperatures in the city?, Sci. Total Environ., 496, 289, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.144

2005, Green structure and Urban planning

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

Tập 40

4-16

Thông tin tác giả