Participation through place-based e-tools: A valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance?

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening - Tập 40 - Trang 245-253 - 2019
Maja Steen Møller1, Anton Stahl Olafsson1, Kati Vierikko2, Karina Sehested1, Birgit Elands3, Arjen Buijs4, Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch5
1University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frb. C, Denmark
2University of Helsinki, Research Services, Yliopistonkatu 3, P.O. Box 65, 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
3Wageningen University, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands
4Wageningen University, Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group and Wageningen Environmental Research, Spatial Development and Policy, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands
5Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agger, 2012, Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance, Town Plan. Rev., 83, 29, 10.3828/tpr.2012.2 Andersson, 2014, Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services, Ambio, 43, 445, 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y Ardoin, 2006, Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: lessons for environmental education, Can. J. Environ. Educ., 1 Arts, 2005, Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms, Policy Sci., 37, 339 Arts, 2006 Arts, 2015, Digital technology and the conservation of nature, Ambio, 44, 661, 10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1 Arts, 2016, Environmental communication in the information age: institutional barriers and opportunities in the provision of river data to the general public, Environ. Sci. Policy, 55, 47, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.011 Babelon, 2016, Toward Cyborg PPGIS: exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden, J. Env. Plann. Manage., 60, 1366, 10.1080/09640568.2016.1221798 Babelon, 2017, Toward Cyborg PPGIS: exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 60, 1366, 10.1080/09640568.2016.1221798 Beatley, 2011 Bertot, 2010, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Gov. Inf. Q., 27, 264, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 Bertot, 2012, The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations, Gov. Inf. Q., 29, 30, 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004 Brandt, 2013, A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science, Ecol. Econ., 92, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008 Brown, 2017, A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI), Trans. GIS, 21, 39, 10.1111/tgis.12207 Brown, 2014, Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research, Appl. Geogr., 46, 122, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004 Brown, 2015, Is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning, Land Use Policy, 43, 228, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014 Buizer, 2015 Buizer, 2016, Governing cities reflexively—the biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services, Environ. Sci. Policy, 62, 7, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003 Cheng, 2003, “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda, Soc. Nat. Resour., 16, 87, 10.1080/08941920309199 Kahila, 2009, SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning, vol 95 Cvejic, 2015 Czepkiewicz, 2013, Geographic information systems in participatory management of nature in the city, Sustainable Dev. Appl., 4 Davies, 2015, 1 Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), 2017 DiMaggio, 2004, From unequal access to differentiated use: a literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality Dunkel, 2015, Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata, Landscape Urban Plann., 142, 173, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022 Ertiö, 2015, Participatory apps for urban planning – space for improvement, Plan. Pract. Res., 30, 303, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1052942 Falco, 2018, Digital participatory platforms for co- production in urban development: a systematic review, Int. J. E-Plan. Res., 7, 1 Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inquiry, 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363 Gottwald, 2016, Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: challenges and opportunities, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 30, 2321, 10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837 Hajer, 2006, A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives, J. Environ. Policy Plann., 7, 175, 10.1080/15239080500339646 Hamstead, 2018, Geolocated social media as a rapid indicator of park visitation and equitable park access, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.01.007 Hansen, 2017, Urban Green infrastructure planning, 184 Healey, 2010 Hilbert, 2011, The end justifies the definition: the manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making, Telecommun. Policy, 35, 715, 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.012 Innes, 2004, Reframing public participation strategies for the 21st century, Plan. Theory Pract., 5, 419, 10.1080/1464935042000293170 Ives, 2017, Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice, Landscape Urban Plann., 161, 32, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.010 Jankowski, 2009, Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1966, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028 Jankowski, 2011, 347 Jankowski, 2017, Geo-questionnaire: a method and tool for public preference elicitation in land use planning, Trans. GIS, 20, 903, 10.1111/tgis.12191 Kahila, 2013, SoftGIS development process as a trading zone: challenges in implementing a participatory planning support system, 75 Kahila-Tani, 2015 Kahila-Tani, 2016, Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki Master Plan process, Plan. Pract. Res., 31, 195, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203 Kleinhans, 2015, Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance, Plan. Pract. Res., 30, 237, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320 Konijnendijk, 2013, Benefits of urban parks: a systematic review, 1 Kyttä, 2013, Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality, Landscape Urban Plann., 113, 30, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008 Lafortezza, 2013, Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions, iForest, 6, 102, 10.3832/ifor0723-006 Liefferink, 2006, The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning round the tetrahedron, 45 Lovell, 2013, Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States, Landscape Ecol., 28, 1447, 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y Masterson, 2017, The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda, Ecol. Soc., 22, 49, 10.5751/ES-08872-220149 Meijer, 2015, E-governance innovation: barriers and strategies, Gov. Inf. Q., 32, 198, 10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001 Miles, 2014 Mol, 2006, Environmental governance in the Information Age: the emergence of informational governance, Env. plan. C: Government Policy, 24, 497, 10.1068/c0508j Mol, 2008 Nam, 2012, Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0, Gov. Inf. Q., 29, 12, 10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005 Nuojua, 2009, WebMapMedia: a map-based Web application for facilitating participation in spatial planning, Multimedia Syst., 16, 3, 10.1007/s00530-009-0175-z Pfeffer, 2013, Participatory spatial knowledge management tools, Inf. Commun. Soc., 16, 258, 10.1080/1369118X.2012.687393 Pietrzyk-Kaszynska, 2017, Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS, Landscape Urban Plann., 160, 85, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012 Rantanen, 2009, The SoftGIS approach to local knowledge, J. Env. Manage., 90, 6, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025 Royo, 2015, “Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level, Electron. Commerce Res., 15, 323, 10.1007/s10660-015-9183-6 Soma, 2016, Roles of citizens in environmental governance in the information age — four theoretical perspectives, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 18, 122, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.12.009 Soma, 2016, Informational governance – a systematic literature review of governance for sustainability in the information age, Environ. Sci. Policy, 56, 89, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.006 Sui, 2011, The convergence of GIS and social media: challenges for GIScience, Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci., 25, 1737, 10.1080/13658816.2011.604636 Sui, 2013 The Aarhus Convention, 1998 UN, 2014 Van der Jagt, 2017, Participatory governance of Urban Green spaces: trends and practices in the EU, Nordic J. Archit. Res., 11 van Deursen, 2010, Internet skills and the digital divide, New Media Soc., 13, 893, 10.1177/1461444810386774 van Deursen, 2013, The digital divide shifts to differences in usage, New Media Soc., 16, 507, 10.1177/1461444813487959 Vierikko, 2017, Considering the ways biocultural diversity helps enforce the urban green infrastructure in times of urban transformation, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 7 Williams, 2014, Making sense of “place”: reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research, Landscape Urban Plann., 131, 74, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002 Wilson, 2013, Situating neogeography, Environ. & Plan. A, 45, 3, 10.1068/a44482