The singly-charged scalar singlet as the origin of neutrino masses

Journal of High Energy Physics - Tập 2021 - Trang 1-39 - 2021
Tobias Felkl1, Juan Herrero-García2, Michael A. Schmidt1
1School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney Consortium for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Sydney, Australia
2Departamento de Física Teórica and IFIC, Universidad de Valencia-CSIC, Paterna, Spain

Tóm tắt

We consider the generation of neutrino masses via a singly-charged scalar singlet. Under general assumptions we identify two distinct structures for the neutrino mass matrix. This yields a constraint for the antisymmetric Yukawa coupling of the singly-charged scalar singlet to two left-handed lepton doublets, irrespective of how the breaking of lepton-number conservation is achieved. The constraint disfavours large hierarchies among the Yukawa couplings. We study the implications for the phenomenology of lepton-flavour universality, measurements of the W-boson mass, flavour violation in the charged-lepton sector and decays of the singly-charged scalar singlet. We also discuss the parameter space that can address the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562 [hep-ex/9807003] [INSPIRE].

SNO collaboration, Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 071301 [nucl-ex/0106015] [INSPIRE].

SNO collaboration, Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301 [nucl-ex/0204008] [INSPIRE].

S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].

P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].

T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].

M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].

R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].

S.L. Glashow, The Future of Elementary Particle Physics, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61 (1980) 687 [INSPIRE].

M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 61 [INSPIRE].

J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) × U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].

G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model, Nucl. Phys. B 181 (1981) 287 [INSPIRE].

C. Wetterich, Neutrino Masses and the Scale of B-L Violation, Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 343 [INSPIRE].

R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165 [INSPIRE].

R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [INSPIRE].

A. Zee, A Theory of Lepton Number Violation, Neutrino Majorana Mass, and Oscillation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 389 [Erratum ibid. 95 (1980) 461] [INSPIRE].

T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) × U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860 [INSPIRE].

L. Wolfenstein, A Theoretical Pattern for Neutrino Oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 175 (1980) 93 [INSPIRE].

A. Zee, Charged Scalar Field and Quantum Number Violations, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 141 [INSPIRE].

A. Zee, Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 264 (1986) 99 [INSPIRE].

K.S. Babu, Model of ‘Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses, Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 132 [INSPIRE].

E. Ma, Neutrino Mass: Mechanisms and Models, arXiv:0905.0221 [INSPIRE].

S.M. Boucenna, S. Morisi and J.W.F. Valle, The low-scale approach to neutrino masses, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014 (2014) 831598 [arXiv:1404.3751] [INSPIRE].

Y. Cai, J. Herrero-García, M.A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R.R. Volkas, From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1706.08524] [INSPIRE].

P. Fileviez Perez and M.B. Wise, On the Origin of Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 053006 [arXiv:0906.2950] [INSPIRE].

S.S.C. Law and K.L. McDonald, The simplest models of radiative neutrino mass, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1450064 [arXiv:1303.6384] [INSPIRE].

C. Klein, M. Lindner and S. Ohmer, Minimal Radiative Neutrino Masses, JHEP 03 (2019) 018 [arXiv:1901.03225] [INSPIRE].

E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1171 [hep-ph/9805219] [INSPIRE].

F. Bonnet, M. Hirsch, T. Ota and W. Winter, Systematic study of the d = 5 Weinberg operator at one-loop order, JHEP 07 (2012) 153 [arXiv:1204.5862] [INSPIRE].

D. Aristizabal Sierra, A. Degee, L. Dorame and M. Hirsch, Systematic classification of two-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 03 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1411.7038] [INSPIRE].

R. Cepedello, M. Hirsch and J.C. Helo, Loop neutrino masses from d = 7 operator, JHEP 07 (2017) 079 [arXiv:1705.01489] [INSPIRE].

R. Cepedello, R.M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, Systematic classification of three-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 10 (2018) 197 [Erratum ibid. 06 (2019) 034] [arXiv:1807.00629] [INSPIRE].

G. Anamiati, O. Castillo-Felisola, R.M. Fonseca, J.C. Helo and M. Hirsch, High-dimensional neutrino masses, JHEP 12 (2018) 066 [arXiv:1806.07264] [INSPIRE].

Y. Farzan, S. Pascoli and M.A. Schmidt, Recipes and Ingredients for Neutrino Mass at Loop Level, JHEP 03 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1208.2732] [INSPIRE].

S.S.C. Law and K.L. McDonald, A Class of Inert N-tuplet Models with Radiative Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter, JHEP 09 (2013) 092 [arXiv:1305.6467] [INSPIRE].

D. Restrepo, O. Zapata and C.E. Yaguna, Models with radiative neutrino masses and viable dark matter candidates, JHEP 11 (2013) 011 [arXiv:1308.3655] [INSPIRE].

F. Bonnet, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter, Neutrino masses from higher than d = 5 effective operators, JHEP 10 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0907.3143] [INSPIRE].

M.B. Krauss, D. Meloni, W. Porod and W. Winter, Neutrino Mass from a d = 7 Effective Operator in an SU(5) SUSY-GUT Framework, JHEP 05 (2013) 121 [arXiv:1301.4221] [INSPIRE].

K.S. Babu and C.N. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 667 [hep-ph/0106054] [INSPIRE].

A. de Gouvêa and J. Jenkins, A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013008 [arXiv:0708.1344] [INSPIRE].

A. de Gouvêa, J. Herrero-Garcia and A. Kobach, Neutrino Masses, Grand Unification, and Baryon Number Violation, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 016011 [arXiv:1404.4057] [INSPIRE].

P.W. Angel, N.L. Rodd and R.R. Volkas, Origin of neutrino masses at the LHC: ∆L = 2 effective operators and their ultraviolet completions, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 073007 [arXiv:1212.6111] [INSPIRE].

Y. Cai, J.D. Clarke, M.A. Schmidt and R.R. Volkas, Testing Radiative Neutrino Mass Models at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2015) 161 [arXiv:1410.0689] [INSPIRE].

J. Gargalionis and R.R. Volkas, Exploding operators for Majorana neutrino masses and beyond, JHEP 01 (2021) 074 [arXiv:2009.13537] [INSPIRE].

F. del Aguila, A. Aparici, S. Bhattacharya, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Effective Lagrangian approach to neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino masses, JHEP 06 (2012) 146 [arXiv:1204.5986] [INSPIRE].

M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Lepton number violating operators with standard model gauge fields: A survey of neutrino masses from 3-loops and their link to dark matter, JHEP 11 (2020) 070 [arXiv:2006.13564] [INSPIRE].

J. Herrero-García and M.A. Schmidt, Neutrino mass models: New classification and model-independent upper limits on their scale, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 938 [arXiv:1903.10552] [INSPIRE].

M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Predictive Model for Radiatively Induced Neutrino Masses and Mixings with Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 211802 [Erratum ibid. 112 (2014) 259902] [arXiv:1212.4806] [INSPIRE].

T. Geib, S.F. King, A. Merle, J.M. No and L. Panizzi, Probing the Origin of Neutrino Masses and Mixings via Doubly Charged Scalars: Complementarity of the Intensity and the Energy Frontiers, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 073007 [arXiv:1512.04391] [INSPIRE].

J. Herrero-García, T. Ohlsson, S. Riad and J. Wirén, Full parameter scan of the Zee model: exploring Higgs lepton flavor violation, JHEP 04 (2017) 130 [arXiv:1701.05345] [INSPIRE].

M. Nebot, J.F. Oliver, D. Palao and A. Santamaria, Prospects for the Zee-Babu Model at the CERN LHC and low energy experiments, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 093013 [arXiv:0711.0483] [INSPIRE].

T. Ohlsson, T. Schwetz and H. Zhang, Non-standard neutrino interactions in the Zee-Babu model, Phys. Lett. B 681 (2009) 269 [arXiv:0909.0455] [INSPIRE].

J. Herrero-Garcia, M. Nebot, N. Rius and A. Santamaria, The Zee-Babu model revisited in the light of new data, Nucl. Phys. B 885 (2014) 542 [arXiv:1402.4491] [INSPIRE].

L.M. Krauss, S. Nasri and M. Trodden, A Model for neutrino masses and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 085002 [hep-ph/0210389] [INSPIRE].

A. Ahriche, C.-S. Chen, K.L. McDonald and S. Nasri, Three-loop model of neutrino mass with dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015024 [arXiv:1404.2696] [INSPIRE].

C.-S. Chen, K.L. McDonald and S. Nasri, A Class of Three-Loop Models with Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 388 [arXiv:1404.6033] [INSPIRE].

J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and μ → e, γ, Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065] [INSPIRE].

I. Cordero-Carrión, M. Hirsch and A. Vicente, Master Majorana neutrino mass parametrization, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075019 [arXiv:1812.03896] [INSPIRE].

I. Cordero-Carrión, M. Hirsch and A. Vicente, General parametrization of Majorana neutrino mass models, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 075032 [arXiv:1912.08858] [INSPIRE].

I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23, δCP, and the mass ordering, JHEP 01 (2019) 106 [arXiv:1811.05487] [INSPIRE].

X.-G. He and S.K. Majee, Implications of Recent Data on Neutrino Mixing and Lepton Flavour Violating Decays for the Zee Model, JHEP 03 (2012) 023 [arXiv:1111.2293] [INSPIRE].

T. Matsui, T. Nomura and K. Yagyu, Flavor Dependent U(1) Symmetric Zee Model with a Vector-like Lepton, arXiv:2102.09247 [INSPIRE].

K.S. Babu and C. Macesanu, Two loop neutrino mass generation and its experimental consequences, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073010 [hep-ph/0212058] [INSPIRE].

K.L. McDonald and B.H.J. McKellar, Evaluating the two loop diagram responsible for neutrino mass in Babu’s model, hep-ph/0309270 [INSPIRE].

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].

A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C.A. Manzari and L. Panizzi, Searching for lepton flavor universality violation and collider signals from a singly charged scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 073002 [arXiv:2012.09845] [INSPIRE].

ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].

Q.-H. Cao, G. Li, K.-P. Xie and J. Zhang, Searching for Weak Singlet Charged Scalar at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 115036 [arXiv:1711.02113] [INSPIRE].

Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].

A. Freitas, TASI 2020 Lectures on Precision Tests of the Standard Model, arXiv:2012.11642 [INSPIRE].

I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2007.14792] [INSPIRE].

MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+ → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].

MEG II collaboration, The design of the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 380 [arXiv:1801.04688] [INSPIRE].

BaBar collaboration, Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays τ± → e±γ and τ± → μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802 [arXiv:0908.2381] [INSPIRE].

Belle-II collaboration, The Belle II Physics Book, PTEP 2019 (2019) 123C01 [Erratum ibid. 2020 (2020) 029201] [arXiv:1808.10567] [INSPIRE].

SINDRUM collaboration, Search for the Decay μ+ → e+e+e−, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].

Mu3e collaboration, Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment, arXiv:2009.11690 [INSPIRE].

K. Hayasaka et al., Search for lepton flavor violating τ decays into three leptons with 719 million produced τ+τ− pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 139 [arXiv:1001.3221] [INSPIRE].

E. Gersabeck and A. Pich, Tau and charm decays, Comptes Rendus Physique 21 (2020) 75.

M.S. Bilenky and A. Santamaria, One loop effective Lagrangian for a standard model with a heavy charged scalar singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 47 [hep-ph/9310302] [INSPIRE].

A. Pich, Precision Tau Physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014) 41 [arXiv:1310.7922] [INSPIRE].

L. Berthier and M. Trott, Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT, JHEP 05 (2015) 024 [arXiv:1502.02570] [INSPIRE].

A.K. Alok, A. Dighe, S. Gangal and J. Kumar, The role of non-universal Z couplings in explaining the Vus anomaly, arXiv:2010.12009 [INSPIRE].

A.M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin and C.A. Manzari, Global Fit to Modified Neutrino Couplings and the Cabibbo-Angle Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 071802 [arXiv:1912.08823] [INSPIRE].

M. Kirk, Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 035004 [arXiv:2008.03261] [INSPIRE].

A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C.A. Manzari and M. Montull, Global Electroweak Fit and Vector-Like Leptons in Light of the Cabibbo Angle Anomaly, JHEP 12 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2008.01113] [INSPIRE].

B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari and M. Montull, Explaining b → sℓ+ℓ− and the Cabibbo angle anomaly with a vector triplet, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015032 [arXiv:2005.13542] [INSPIRE].

M. Endo and S. Mishima, Muon g − 2 and CKM unitarity in extra lepton models, JHEP 08 (2020) 004 [arXiv:2005.03933] [INSPIRE].

A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter, β Decays as Sensitive Probes of Lepton Flavor Universality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 111801 [arXiv:2002.07184] [INSPIRE].

B. Belfatto, R. Beradze and Z. Berezhiani, The CKM unitarity problem: A trace of new physics at the TeV scale?, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1906.02714] [INSPIRE].

Flavour Lattice Averaging Group collaboration, FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 113 [arXiv:1902.08191] [INSPIRE].

HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 226 [arXiv:1909.12524] [INSPIRE].

C.Y. Seng, M. Gorchtein and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Dispersive evaluation of the inner radiative correction in neutron and nuclear β decay, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 013001 [arXiv:1812.03352] [INSPIRE].

C.-Y. Seng, X. Feng, M. Gorchtein and L.-C. Jin, Joint lattice QCD-dispersion theory analysis confirms the quark-mixing top-row unitarity deficit, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 111301 [arXiv:2003.11264] [INSPIRE].

A. Pich, Challenges for tau physics at the TeraZ, arXiv:2012.07099 [INSPIRE].

FCC collaboration, FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 474 [INSPIRE].

Super Charm-Tau Factory collaboration, The Super Charm-Tau Factory in Novosibirsk, PoS LeptonPhoton2019 (2019) 062 [INSPIRE].

Q. Luo, W. Gao, J. Lan, W. Li and D. Xu, Progress of Conceptual Study for the Accelerators of a 2–7 GeV Super Tau Charm Facility at China, in 10th International Particle Accelerator Conference, p. MOPRB031 (2019) [DOI].

I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].

J. Erler, Electroweak Precision Tests of the SM, Frascati Phys. Ser. 69 (2019) 164 [arXiv:1908.07346] [INSPIRE].

CEPC Study Group collaboration, CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 — Physics & Detector, arXiv:1811.10545 [INSPIRE].

Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions, Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 10 [arXiv:1710.09360] [INSPIRE].

B. Dev, NSI and Neutrino Mass Models at DUNE, https://indico.fnal.gov/event/18430/contributions/47239/attachments/29448/36310/dev_pondd.pdf (2018).

J. Tang and W. Winter, Physics with near detectors at a neutrino factory, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 053001 [arXiv:0903.3039] [INSPIRE].

S.T. Petcov, Remarks on the Zee model of neutrino mixing (μ → e + γ, νH → νL + γ, etc.), Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 401 [INSPIRE].

S. Bertolini and A. Santamaria, The Doublet Majoron Model and Solar Neutrino Oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 310 (1988) 714 [INSPIRE].

S.M. Bilenky and S.T. Petcov, Massive Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscillations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) 671 [Erratum ibid. 61 (1989) 169] [Erratum ibid. 60 (1988) 575] [INSPIRE].

A. Pich, A. Santamaria and J. Bernabeu, μ− → e−γ decay in the scalar triplet model, Phys. Lett. B 148 (1984) 229 [INSPIRE].

Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 151 [hep-ph/9909265] [INSPIRE].

A. Crivellin, S. Najjari and J. Rosiek, Lepton Flavor Violation in the Standard Model with general Dimension-Six Operators, JHEP 04 (2014) 167 [arXiv:1312.0634] [INSPIRE].

SINDRUM II collaboration, A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 337 [INSPIRE].

A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g − 2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113002 [arXiv:1807.11484] [INSPIRE].

R. Kitano, M. Koike and Y. Okada, Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 096002 [Erratum ibid. 76 (2007) 059902] [hep-ph/0203110] [INSPIRE].

R.K. Kutschke, The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab, in 31st International Symposium on Physics In Collision (2011) [arXiv:1112.0242] [INSPIRE].

COMET collaboration, COMET/PRISM muon to electron conversion at J-PARC, AIP Conf. Proc. 1182 (2009) 694 [INSPIRE].

Y. Kuno, PRISM/PRIME, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 149 (2005) 376 [INSPIRE].

S.R. Moore, K. Whisnant and B.-L. Young, Second Order Corrections to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment in Alternative Electroweak Models, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 105 [INSPIRE].

J.P. Leveille, The Second Order Weak Correction to (g − 2) of the Muon in Arbitrary Gauge Models, Nucl. Phys. B 137 (1978) 63 [INSPIRE].

M. Lindner, M. Platscher and F.S. Queiroz, A Call for New Physics: The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavor Violation, Phys. Rept. 731 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1610.06587] [INSPIRE].

Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].

T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].

Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].

I. Bigaran and R.R. Volkas, Getting chirality right: Single scalar leptoquark solutions to the (g − 2)e,μ puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075037 [arXiv:2002.12544] [INSPIRE].

D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 120801 [arXiv:0801.1134] [INSPIRE].

D. Hanneke, S.F. Hoogerheide and G. Gabrielse, Cavity Control of a Single-Electron Quantum Cyclotron: Measuring the Electron Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 052122 [arXiv:1009.4831] [INSPIRE].

R.H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].

L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature 588 (2020) 61 [INSPIRE].

N. Chakrabarty, C.-W. Chiang, T. Ohata and K. Tsumura, Charged scalars confronting neutrino mass and muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 12 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1807.08167] [INSPIRE].

T. Nomura and H. Okada, Zee-Babu type model with \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095023 [arXiv:1803.04795] [INSPIRE].

M.H. et al, python-ternary: Ternary plots in python, 10.5281/zenodo.594435.

H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].

T. Suzuki, D.F. Measday and J.P. Roalsvig, Total Nuclear Capture Rates for Negative Muons, Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987) 2212 [INSPIRE].

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of High Energy Physics

Tập 2021

1-39

Thông tin tác giả