Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer will offer rapid publication of original full-length research articles, perspectives, reviews and letters to the editors on genetic analysis as related to the study of neoplasia. The main scope of the journal is to communicate new insights into the etiology and/or pathogenesis of neoplasia, as well as molecular and cellular findings of relevance for the management of cancer patients. While preference will be given to research utilizing analytical and functional approaches, descriptive studies and case reports will also be welcomed when they offer insights regarding basic biological mechanisms or the clinical management of neoplastic disorders.
Martine Muleris, Anna Almeida, Michèle Gerbault‐Seureau, Bernard Malfoy, Bernard Dutrillaux
AbstractA modified comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) technique was used to identify and map amplified DNA sequences in six homogeneously staining regions (hsr) from three primary breast carcinomas. Five different chromosomal regions and bands were identified as sites of amplification: 8p1, 17q21.1, 17q23 (two cases), 19q13.3, and 20q13.3. The mCGH site located on 17q21.1 was demonstrated to correspond to a 50–100‐fold amplification of ERBB2. Further in situ hybridization experiments were used to confirm the mCGH results and to characterize the organization of the amplified sequences within the hsr. In five of six instances, two or more chromosomal regions were found amplified in the same hsr. In the tumor with the less modified karyotype, the two hsr comprised DNA sequences from three different chromosomes and showed different patterns of amplification. In the tumor with the most rearranged karyotype, the hsr‐carrying chromosomes were formed by the translocation and amplification of sequences from three or four different chromosomal sites. This illustrates the complexity of the amplification process in breast cancers.
Charles Theillet, José Adélaı̈de, Geneviève Louason, Françoise Bonnet‐Dorion, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Jalila Adnane, Michel Longy, Dionyssios Katsaros, P Sismondi, Patrick Gaudray, Daniel Birnbaum
Nikos Pandis, Yuesheng Jin, Ludmila Gorunova, Catarina Petersson, Georgia Bardi, Ingrid Idvall, Björn Johansson, Christian Ingvar, Nils Mandahl, Felix Mitelman, S Heim
AbstractChromosome banding analysis of 97 short‐term cultured primary breast carcinomas revealed clonal aberrations in 79 tumors, whereas 18 were karyotypically normal. In 34 of the 79 tumors with abnormalities, two to eight clones per case were detected; unrelated clones were present in 27 (34%) cases, whereas only related clones were found in seven. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of breast carcinomas are of polyclonal origin. Altogether eight abnormalities were repeatedly identified both as sole chromosomal anomalies and as part of more complex karyotypes: the structural rearrangements i(1)(q10), der(1;16)(q10;p10), del(1)(q11–12), del(3)(p12–13p14–21), and del(6)(q21–22) and the numerical aberrations +7, +18, and +20. At least one of these changes was found in 41 (52%) of the karyotypically abnormal tumors. They identify a minimum number of cytogenetic subgroups in breast cancer and are likely to represent primary chromosome anomalies in this type of neoplasia. Other candidates for such a role are translocations of 3p12–13 and 4q21 with various partner chromosomes and inversions of chromosome 7, which also were seen repeatedly. Additional chromosomal aberrations that give the impression of occurring nonrandomly in breast carcinomas include structural rearrangements leading to partial monosomies for 1p, 8p, 11p, 11q, 15p, 17p, 19p, and 19q and losses of one copy of chromosomes X, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, and 22. The latter changes were seen consistently only in complex karyotypes, however, and we therefore interpret them as being secondary anomalies acquired during clonal evolution.
Gopeshwar Narayan, V Bourdon, Seeta R. Chaganti, Hugo Arias‐Pulido, Subhadra V. Nandula, Pulivarthi H. Rao, Lutz Gissmann, Matthias Dürst, Achim Schneider, Bhavana Pothuri, Mahesh Mansukhani, Katia Basso, R. S. K. Chaganti, Vundavalli V. Murty
Christoph Walz, David Grimwade, Susanne Saußele, Eva Lengfelder, Claudia Haferlach, Susanne Schnittger, Marina Lafage‐Pochitaloff, Andreas Hochhaus, Nicholas C.P. Cross, Andreas Reiter
Bertil Johansson, Fredrik Mertens, Tommy Schyman, Jonas Björk, Nils Mandahl, Felix Mitelman
AbstractCancer‐associated gene fusions resulting in chimeric proteins or aberrant expression of one or both partner genes are pathogenetically and clinically important in several hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Since the advent of different types of massively parallel sequencing (MPS), the number of identified gene fusions has increased dramatically, prompting the question whether they all have a biologic impact. By ascertaining the chromosomal locations of 8934 genes involved in 10 861 gene fusions reported in the literature, we here show that there is a highly significant association between gene content of chromosomes and chromosome bands and number of genes involved in fusions. This strongly suggests that a clear majority of gene fusions detected by MPS are stochastic events associated with the number of genes available to participate in fusions and that most reported gene fusions are passengers without any pathogenetic importance.