Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alteration are associated with different clinicopathological features and gene‐expression subtypes of breast cancer

Genes Chromosomes and Cancer - Tập 45 Số 11 - Trang 1033-1040 - 2006
Anna Bergamaschi1,2, Young Ho Kim2, Pei Wang3, Thérese Sørlie1, Tina Hernandez‐Boussard4, Per Eystein Lønning5, Robert Tibshirani3,6, Anne‐Lise Børresen‐Dale1,7, Jonathan R. Pollack2
1Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway
2Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
3Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
4Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California
5Department of Medicine (Oncology), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
6Health Research & Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California
7Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Tóm tắt

AbstractBreast cancer is a leading cause of cancer‐death among women, where the clinicopathological features of tumors are used to prognosticate and guide therapy. DNA copy number alterations (CNAs), which occur frequently in breast cancer and define key pathogenetic events, are also potentially useful prognostic or predictive factors. Here, we report a genome‐wide array‐based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) survey of CNAs in 89 breast tumors from a patient cohort with locally advanced disease. Statistical analysis links distinct cytoband loci harboring CNAs to specific clinicopathological parameters, including tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, presence of TP53 mutation, and overall survival. Notably, distinct spectra of CNAs also underlie the different subtypes of breast cancer recently defined by expression‐profiling, implying these subtypes develop along distinct genetic pathways. In addition, higher numbers of gains/losses are associated with the “basal‐like” tumor subtype, while high‐level DNA amplification is more frequent in “luminal‐B” subtype tumors, suggesting also that distinct mechanisms of genomic instability might underlie their pathogenesis. The identified CNAs may provide a basis for improved patient prognostication, as well as a starting point to define important genes to further our understanding of the pathobiology of breast cancer. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1045‐2257/suppmat. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/nrm1703

10.1677/erc.1.01059

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1945

10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0

10.1016/j.ejca.2004.02.025

10.1093/jnci/djg050

Geisler S, 2003, TP53 gene mutations predict the response to neoadjuvant treatment with 5‐fluorouracil and mitomycin in locally advanced breast cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 9, 5582

Geisler S, 2001, Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c‐erbB‐2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer, Cancer Res, 61, 2505

10.1093/nar/gkg078

10.1007/s10549-005-0144-y

Isola JJ, 1995, Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node‐negative breast cancer, Am J Pathol, 147, 905

10.1073/pnas.151241198

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64952-8

10.1016/S0959-8049(97)89007-7

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64579-8

10.1038/25292

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1992

McGuire WL, 1978, Steroid receptors in human breast cancer, Cancer Res, 38, 4289

10.1056/NEJM199405053301802

10.1093/hmg/11.11.1327

10.1056/NEJMoa041588

10.1038/35021093

10.1038/12640

10.1073/pnas.162471999

10.1097/01.pap.0000184178.43048.80

10.1002/1097-0215(20000520)89:3<305::AID-IJC15>3.0.CO;2-8

10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.013

10.1002/stem.160413

10.1007/s001090050155

10.1073/pnas.191367098

10.1073/pnas.0932692100

10.1007/s11864-005-0022-1

Tanner MM, 1995, Amplification of chromosomal region 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: Prognostic implications, Clin Cancer Res, 1, 1455

Tirkkonen M, 1997, Distinct somatic genetic changes associated with tumor progression in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ‐line mutations, Cancer Res, 57, 1222

10.1073/pnas.091062498

10.1038/415530a

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2570

10.1007/s10637-005-2899-8