Whole Language vs. Code Emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 40 - Trang 51-76 - 1990
I. Y. Liberman1, A. M. Liberman1
1Haskins Laboratories, New Haven

Tóm tắt

Promoters of Whole Language hew to the belief that learning to read and write can be as natural and effortless as learning to perceive and produce speech. From this it follows that there is no special key to reading and writing, no explicit principle to be taught that, once learned, makes the written language transparent to a child who can speak. Lacking such a principle, Whole Language falls back on a method that encourages children to get from print just enough information to provide a basis for guessing at the gist. A very different method, called Code Emphasis, presupposes that learning the spoken language is, indeed, perfectly natural and seemingly effortless, but only because speech is managed, as reading and writing are not, by a biological specialization that automatically spells or parses all the words the child commands. Hence, a child normally learns to use words without ever becoming explicitly aware that each one is formed by the consonants and vowels that an alphabet represents. Yet it is exactly this awareness that must be taught if the child is to grasp the alphabetic principle and so understand how the artifacts of an alphabet transcribe the natural units of language. There is evidene that preliterate children do not, in fact, have much of this awareness; that the amount they do have predicts their reading achievement; that the awareness can be taught; and that the relative difficulty of learning it that some childen have may be a reflection of a weakness in the phonological component of their natural capacity for language.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Blachman, B.A. 1988. Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention.In A.G. Kamhi and H.W. Catts (eds.).Reading Disorders: A developmental language perspective. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.

Blachman, B.A. 1987. An alternative classroom reading program for learning disabled and other low-achieving children.In W. Ellis (ed.).Intimacy with Language: A forgotten basic in teacher education. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

Bradley, L. 1988. Rhyme recognition and reading and spelling in young children.In W. Ellis (ed.).Intimacy with Language: A forgotten basic in teacher education. Second Edition. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

Bryant, P.E., and Goswami, U. 1987. Beyond grapheme-phoneme correspondence.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 7:439–443.

Conrad, R. 1964. Acoustic confusions in immediate memory.British Journal of Psychology 55:75–84.

de Manrique, A.M.B. and Gramigna, S. 1984. La segmentacion fonologica y silabica en niños de preescolar y primer grado.Lect. y Vida 5:4–13.

Elkonin, D.B. 1973. U.S.S.R.In J. Downing (ed.).Comparative Reading. New York: MacMillan.

Enfield, M.L. 1987. A cost-effective classroom alternative to “pull-out programs”.In W. Ellis (ed.).Intimacy with Language: A forgotten basic in teacher education. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.

Gallistel, E., Fischer, P., and Blackburn, M. 1977.Manual: GFB Sequence of Objectives for Teaching and Testing Reading in the Concept Transfer Sequence. Hamden, CT: Montage Press.

Gillingham, A. and Stillman, B. 1956.Remedial Training for Children with Specific Disability in Reading, Spelling, and Penmanship (Rev. Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

Golinkoff, R.M. 1978. Phonemic awareness skills and reading achievement.In F.B. Murray and J.H. Pikulski (eds.).The acquisition of reading: Cognitive, linguistic, and perceptual prerequisites (pp. 23–41). Baltimore: University Park Press.

Goodman, K.S. 1986.What’s Whole in Whole Language: A Parent-Teacher Guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Gough, P.B., Alford, J.A., Jr., and Holley-Wilcox, P. 1981. Words and contexts.In O.J.L. Tzeng and H. Singer (eds.).Perception of Print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Jastak, J.F. and Jastak, S. 1978.The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

Liberman, A.M. and Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1978. Phonetic perception.In R. Held, H.W. Leibowitz and H.-L. Teuber (eds.).Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. VIII,Perception. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Liberman, I.Y., Rubin, H., Duques, S., and Carlisle, J. 1985. Linguistic skills and spelling proficiency in kindergartners and adult poor spellers.In D. B. Gray and J. F. Kavanagh (eds.).Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.

Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Blachman, B., Camp, L., and Werfelman, M. 1980. Steps toward literacy.In P. Levinson and C. Sloan (eds.).Auditory Processing and Language: Clinical and research perspectives. New York: Grune and Stratton.

Lindamood, C.H. and Lindamood, P.C. 1975.The A.D.D. Program, Auditory Discrimination in Depth. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.

Lukatela, K., Liberman, I.Y., and Shankweiler, D. (in preparation). Cognitive characteristics of Yugoslav illiterate farm women.

Lundberg, I. 1988. Lack of phonological awareness—a critical factor in developmental dyslexia.In C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, and G. Lennerstrand (eds.).Wenner-Gren Symposium Series 54, Brain and Reading. London: Macmillan Press.

Magnusson, E. and Naucler, K. 1987. Language disordered and normally speaking children’s development of spoken and written language: Preliminary results from a longitudinal study. Report Uppsala University Linguistics Department, 16, 35–63.

Marcel, A. 1980. Phonological awareness and phonological representation: Investigation of a specific spelling problem.In V. Frith (ed.).Cognitive Processes in Spelling. London: Academic Press.

Miller, G. 1977.Spontaneous Apprentices. New York: Seabury Press.

Routh, D.K. and Fox, B. 1984. “Mm … is a little bit of May: Phonemes, reading, and spelling.”In K.D. Gadow and P. Bialen (eds.).Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Slingerland, B.H. 1971.A Multisensory Approach to Language Arts for Specific Language Disability Children: A guide for primary teachers. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

Treiman, R.A., and Baron, J. 1981. Segmental analysis ability: Development and relation to reading ability.In G.E. MacKinnon and R.G. Walker (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice 3: New York: Academic Press.

Williams, J.P. 1985. The case for explicit decoding instruction.In J. Osborn, P. Wilson, and R. Anderson (eds.).Reading Education: Foundations for a Literate America. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.