Towards expert–machine collaborations for technology valuation: An interpretable machine learning approach

Elsevier BV - Tập 183 - Trang 121940 - 2022
Juram Kim1, Gyumin Lee2, Seungbin Lee3, Changyong Lee4
1Center for R&D Investment and Strategy Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, 66 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02456, Republic of Korea
2School of Business Administration, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, 50 UNIST-gil, Ulsan, 44919, Republic of Korea
3Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04107, Republic of Korea
4Department of Public Administration, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baek, 2007, A technology valuation model to support technology transfer negotiations, R&D Manag., 37, 123, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00462.x

Bessen, 2008, The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics, Res. Policy, 37, 932, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005

Bierly, 1996, Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry, Strateg. Manag. J., 17, 123, 10.1002/smj.4250171111

Callaert, 2006, Traces of prior art: an analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents, Scientometrics, 69, 3, 10.1007/s11192-006-0135-8

Chen, 2016, XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system, 785

Chen, 2012, Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact, MIS Q., 36, 1165, 10.2307/41703503

Chiu, 2007, Using AHP in patent valuation, Math. Comput. Model., 46, 1054, 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.009

Choi, 2020, A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties: a machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime, Comput. Ind. Eng., 145, 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106544

Chung, 2020, Early detection of valuable patents using a deep learning model: case of semiconductor industry, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 158, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120146

Coates, 2001, On the future of technological forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 67, 1, 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00122-0

Corredoira, 2018, Federal funding and the rate and direction of inventive activity, Res. Policy, 47, 1777, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.009

Cortes, 1995, Support vector machine, Mach. Learn., 20, 273, 10.1007/BF00994018

Du, 2019, Techniques for interpretable machine learning, Commun. ACM, 63, 68, 10.1145/3359786

Ernst, 2003, Patent information for strategic technology management, World Patent Inf., 25, 233, 10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2

Fischer, 2014, Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value—an empirical analysis of ocean Tomo patent auctions, Res. Policy, 43, 519, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.013

Friedman, 2001, Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Ann. Stat., 1189

Friedman, 2001

Guellec, 2000, Applications, grants and the value of patent, Econ. Lett., 69, 109, 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00265-2

Gunning, 2019, DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program, AI Mag., 40, 44

Gunning, 2021, DARPA’s explainable AI (XAI) program: a retrospective, Appl. AI Lett., 2, 10.1002/ail2.61

Harhoff, 2003, Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Res. Policy, 32, 1343, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5

Higham, 2021, Patent quality: towards a systematic framework for analysis and measurement, Res. Policy, 50, 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104215

Hirschey, 2004, Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?, J. Empir. Financ., 11, 91, 10.1016/j.jempfin.2003.01.001

Ho, 1995, Random decision forests, 278

Honegger, 2018

Hong, 2022, Screening ideas in the early stages of technology development: a word2vec and convolutional neural network approach, Technovation, 112, 102407, 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102407

Jaccard, 1912, The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone, New Phytol., 11, 37, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x

Jaffe, 2002

Jang, 2017, Hawkes process-based technology impact analysis, J. Informetr., 11, 511, 10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.007

Jarrahi, 2018, Artificial intelligence and the future of work: human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making, Bus. Horiz., 61, 577, 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007

Kim, 2019, Many hands: the effect of the prior inventor-intermediaries relationship on academic licensing, Res. Policy, 48, 813, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.007

Kim, 2021, Valuation of university-originated technologies: a predictive analytics approach, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 68, 1813, 10.1109/TEM.2019.2938182

Ko, 2019, A transferability evaluation model for intellectual property, Comput. Ind. Eng., 131, 344, 10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.011

Kogan, 2017, Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth, Q. J. Econ., 132, 665, 10.1093/qje/qjw040

Lanjouw, 2001, Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition, RAND J. Econ., 129, 10.2307/2696401

Lee, 2021, A review of data analytics in technological forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 166, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120646

Lee, 2012, A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 79, 16, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.009

Lee, 2016, Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 106, 53, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.024

Lee, 2018, Early identification of emerging technologies: a machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 127, 291, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.002

Lerner, 1994, The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis, RAND J. Econ., 319, 10.2307/2555833

Lloyd, 1982, Least squares quantization in PCM, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 28, 129, 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489

Lundberg, 2017, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, 4768

Lundberg, 2018

Lundberg, 2020, From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, Nat. Mach. Intell., 2, 56, 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9

Ma, 2008, Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005, Technovation, 28, 379, 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.011

Meyer, 2006, Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: an exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology, Res. Policy, 35, 1646, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.013

Miller, 2019, Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences, Artif. Intell., 267, 1, 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007

Min, 2021, The impact of the timing of patent allowance on technology licensing performance: evidence from university invention commercialization, R&D Manag.

Molnar, 2020

Park, 2004, A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: procedure and application, Technovation, 24, 387, 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00099-8

Reitzig, 2004, Improving patent valuations for management purposes—validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales, Res. Policy, 33, 939, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.02.004

Rendle, 2010, Factorization machines, 995

Ribeiro, 2016, “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier, 1135

Ribeiro, 2018, Anchors: high-precision model-agnostic explanations, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 32

Shapley, 1953

Shin, 2013, Robust future-oriented technology portfolios: black-litterman approach, R&D Manag., 43, 409, 10.1111/radm.12022

Thursby, 2001, Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major US universities, J. Technol. Transfer., 26, 59, 10.1023/A:1007884111883

Trajtenberg, 1990, A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations, RAND J. Econ., 172, 10.2307/2555502

van Zeebroeck, 2007

Woo, 2019, Screening early stage ideas in technology development processes: a text mining and k-nearest neighbours approach using patent information, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 31, 532, 10.1080/09537325.2018.1523386

Wright, 2014, Technology transfer: industry-funded academic inventions boost innovation, Nat. News, 507, 297, 10.1038/507297a

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Elsevier BV

Tập 183

121940

Thông tin tác giả