A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts

Lee, 2011, Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: a modified formal concept analysis approach, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 78, 690, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.010 Narayanan, 2009, Technology sourcing and its determinants: a study of basic chemical industry in India, Technovation, 29, 562, 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.005 Basalla, 1988 Schumpeter, 1939 Usher, 1954 Rosenberg, 1979, Technological interdependence in the American economy, Technol. Cult., 20, 25, 10.2307/3103110 Fleming, 2001, Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data, Res. Policy, 30, 1019, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9 Iansiti, 1995, Technology integration: managing technological evolution in a complex environment, Res. Policy, 24, 521, 10.1016/S0048-7333(94)00781-0 Porter, 1991 Watts, 1997, Innovation Forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 56, 25, 10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00050-4 Ayers, 1969 Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group, 2004, Technology futures analysis: toward integration of the field and new methods, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 71, 287, 10.1016/j.techfore.2003.11.004 Martino, 1980, Technology forecasting – an overview, Manage. Sci., 26, 28, 10.1287/mnsc.26.1.28 Coates, 2001, On the future of technological forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 67, 1, 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00122-0 Mann, 2003, Better technology forecasting using systemic innovation methods, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 70, 779, 10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00357-8 Choi, 2009, Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development path, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 754, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.007 Ernst, 1998, Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning, J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 15, 279, 10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00018-6 Trajtenberg, 1990, A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of inventions, RAND J. Econ., 21, 172, 10.2307/2555502 Schmittlein, 1987, Counting your customers: who are they and what will they do next?, Manage. Sci., 33, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.33.1.1 Park, 2005, The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: patent citation analysis, Technol. Soc., 27, 471, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.003 Blackman, 1995, Provision of patent information: a national patent office perspective, World Pat. Inf., 17, 115, 10.1016/0172-2190(95)00012-O Wartburg, 2005, Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis, Res. Policy, 34, 1591, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.001 Harhoff, 2003, Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Res. Policy, 32, 1343, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5 Cheng, 2010, Profitability decided by patent quality? An empirical study of the U.S. semiconductor industry, Scientometrics, 82, 175, 10.1007/s11192-009-0080-4 Lee, 2009, An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: a case of telecommunication technologies, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 894, 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.026 Ernst, 2003, Patent information for strategic technology management, World Pat. Inf., 25, 233, 10.1016/S0172-2190(03)00077-2 Hall, 2001, The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights, and methodological tools Narin, 1987, Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength, Res. Policy, 16, 143, 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X Breitzman, 2002, Using patent citation analysis to target/value M&A candidates, Res. Technol. Manage., 45, 28, 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671519 Li, 2007, Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004), J. Nano. Res., 9, 337, 10.1007/s11051-006-9194-2 Chakrabarti, 1991, Competition in high technology: analysis of patent of U.S., Japan, U.K., France, West Germany, and Canada, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 38, 78, 10.1109/17.65763 Marinova, 2003, Nanotechnology strength indicators: international rankings based on US patent, Nanotechnology, 14, R1, 10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/201 Lee, 2009, An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: keyword-based patent map approach, Technovation, 29, 471 Meyer, 2002, Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems, Scientometrics, 54, 193, 10.1023/A:1016057727209 Waguespack, 2005, Foreignness and the diffusion of ideas, J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 22, 31, 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.11.005 Jaffe, 1998, International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations Han, 2006, Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: the case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries, World Pat. Inf., 28, 235, 10.1016/j.wpi.2006.01.015 Ham, 1998, The evolving role of semiconductor consortia in the United States and Japan, Calif. Manage. Rev., 41, 137, 10.2307/41165979 Shin, 2007, Building the national ICT frontier: the case of Korea, Inf. Econ. Pol., 19, 249, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.01.003 Meyer, 2000, Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Res. Policy, 29, 409, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00040-2 Tijssen, 2001, Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Res. Policy, 30, 35, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00080-3 Wallace, 1986, The relationship between journal productivity and obsolescence, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 37, 136, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198605)37:3<136::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-R Glänzel, 1994, A stochastic model for the ageing of scientific literature, Scientometrics, 30, 49, 10.1007/BF02017212 Glänzel, 1992, On some stopping times on citation processes, from theory to indicators, Inf. Proc. Manage., 28, 53, 10.1016/0306-4573(92)90092-E Rousseau, 1994, Double exponential models for first-citation processes, Scientometrics, 30, 213, 10.1007/BF02017224 Egghe, 2000, Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth and utilization: definitions and relations, J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci., 51, 1004, 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1003>3.0.CO;2-8 Burrell, 2001, Stochastic modelling of the first citation distribution, Scientometrics, 52, 3, 10.1023/A:1012751509975 Burrell, 2002, The nth-citation distribution and obsolescence, Scientometrics, 53, 309, 10.1023/A:1014816911511 Burrell, 2003, Predicting future citation behavior, J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 54, 372, 10.1002/asi.10207 Mingers, 2006, Modeling citation behavior in Management Science Journals, Inf. Proc. Manage., 42, 1451, 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.012 Johnson, 1970 Lee, 1986, Specification test for poisson regression models, Int. Econ. Rev., 27, 689, 10.2307/2526689 Fader, 2005, RFM and CLV: using iso-value curves for customer base analysis, Am. Market. Assoc., 42, 415 Karlin, 1975 Albert, 1991, Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents, Res. Policy, 20, 251, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U USPTO, Overview of the US patent classification system (USPC), Electronic document at http://www.uspto.gov, 2006. Karki, 1997, Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool, World Pat. Inf., 19, 269, 10.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1 Yin, 2009 Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manage. Rev., 14, 532, 10.2307/258557 Park, 2006, Measurement of depreciation rate of technological knowledge: technological cycle time approach, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 65, 121 Park, 2006, On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 73, 793, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.006 Narion, 1995, Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output, Scientometrics, 34, 489, 10.1007/BF02018015 Bacchiocchi, 2004, EPO vs. USPTO citation lags