The importance of considering agricultural dynamics when discussing agro-environmental sustainability in futures studies of biogas
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alcamo, 2008, Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios, Vol. 2, 123
Ampese, 2022, Research progress, trends, and updates on anaerobic digestion technology: A bibliometric analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130004
Auer, 2017, Agricultural anaerobic digestion power plants in Ireland and Germany: Policy and practice, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97, 719, 10.1002/jsfa.8005
Berkhout, 2006, Normative expectations in systems innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 299, 10.1080/09537320600777010
Blanco‐Canqui, 2015, Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils, Agronomy Journal, 107, 2449, 10.2134/agronj15.0086
Borup, 2006, The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 285, 10.1080/09537320600777002
Britz, 2013, The impact of German biogas production on European and global agricultural markets, land use and the environment, Energy Policy, 62, 1268, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.123
Brown, 2000, Introducing contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future, 3
Chambres d’agriculture. (2022, mai 18). La méthanisation agricole. https://chambres-agriculture.fr/exploitation-agricole/developper-des-projets/economie-et-production-denergies/la-methanisation-agricole/.
Chateauraynaud, F., & Debaz, J. (2017). Aux bords de l’irréversible: Sociologie pragmatique des transformations. Éditions Pétra.
Clermont-Dauphin, 2014, Vol. 14, 117
Cochet, 2007, L’agriculture comparée, une discipline de synthèse ?, Économie rurale, 297–298, 99, 10.4000/economierurale.2043
Confédération paysanne. (2020). La méthanisation est-elle compatible avec l’agriculture paysanne ? Supplément à Campagnes solidaires. https://www.confederationpaysanne.fr/sites/1/mots_cles/documents/4_pages_META_BD.pdf.
Darnhofer, 2015, Socio-technical transitions in farming: Key concepts, 17
2012
Delecourt, 2019, Work-related information needed by farmers for changing to sustainable cropping practices, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39, 28, 10.1007/s13593-019-0571-5
Duque-Acevedo, 2020, Agricultural waste: Review of the evolution, approaches and perspectives on alternative uses, Global Ecology and Conservation, 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00902
Emmann, 2013, Impacts of biogas production on the production factors land and labour – Current effects, Possible Consequences and Further Research Needs, 13
Etats généraux de l’alimentation. (2017). Conclusions des Etats Généraux de l’alimentation—Atelier 11 . https://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/static/15/commissions/CAffEco/egalim-atelier11.pdf.
FNSEA. (2022). Accélérer le développement du biogaz pour réduire la dépendance énergétique de la France. fnsea.fr. https://www.fnsea.fr/communiques-de-presse/accelerer-le-developpement-du-biogaz-pour-reduire-la-dependance-energetique-de-la-france/.
FranceAgriMer. (2022). Ressources en biomasse et méthanisation agricole : Quelles disponibilités pour quels besoins. https://www.franceagrimer.fr/content/download/69402/document/RESSOURCES%20EN%20BIOMASSE%20ET%20METHANISATION%202022%20-%20Maquette%20VF.pdf.
Garb, 2008, Scenarios in society, society in scenarios: Toward a social scientific analysis of storyline-driven environmental modeling, Environmental Research Letters, 3, 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045015
Geels, 2000, Lessons from Failed Technology Futures: Potholes in the Road to the Future, 143
Godet, 2007
Gregorie, 2020, Hydrogen and Biogas, 131
Grillo, 2021, Agro-environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestate fractions in intensive cropping systems: Insights regarding the nitrogen use efficiency and crop performance, Agronomy, 11, 10.3390/agronomy11040745
Grouiez, P., Berthe, A., Fautras, M., & Issehnane, S. (2020). Déterminants et mesure des revenus agricoles de la méthanisation et positionnement des agriculteurs dans la chaîne de valeur " biomasse-énergie "—Scientific report. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02886217/document.
Gustafsson, 2021, Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies – Modelling the European policy landscape, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110200
Hedgecoe, 2003, The drugs don’t work: Expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics, Social Studies of Science, 33, 327, 10.1177/03063127030333002
Herrmann, 2013, Biogas production from maize: Current state, challenges and prospects. 2. Agronomic and environmental aspects, BioEnergy Research, 6, 372, 10.1007/s12155-012-9227-x
Herrmann, 2017, Effect of biogas digestate, animal manure and mineral fertilizer application on nitrogen flows in biogas feedstock production, European Journal of Agronomy, 91, 63, 10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.011
Hoang, 2020, Impacts of biogas production on nitrogen flows on Dutch dairy system: Multiple level assessment of nitrogen indicators within the biogas production chain, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24, 665, 10.1111/jiec.12956
Jasanoff, 2015
Jiménez Cisneros, B.E., Oki, T., Arnell, N.W., Benito, G., Cogley, J.G., Döll, P., Jiang, T., Mwakalila, S.S., & Field, C.B., V.R. Barros , D.J. Dokken , K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. (2014). Freshwater resources. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPPC (Cambridge University Press, p. 229–269.). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/freshwater-resources/.
Joly, 2015, Le régime des promesses technoscientifique. In Sciences et technologies émergentes: Pourquoi tant de promesses? (p. np), Hermann, Editeurs des Sciences et des Arts
Jørgensen, M.S., Andersen, M.M., Hansen, A., Wenzel, H., Thoning, T., Jørgensen, U., Falch, M., Olsen, S.I., & Willum, O. (2006). Green Technology Foresight about environmentally friendly products and materials (p. 264). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael-Jorgensen-10/publication/237456180_Green_technology_foresight_of_products_and_materials_-_some_reflections_and_results_from_an_ongoing_Danish_project/links/00b7d528952bb69687000000/Green-technology-foresight-of-products-and-materials-some-reflections-and-results-from-an-ongoing-Danish-project.pdf?origin=publication_detail.
Justes, E. (2017). Cover crops for sustainable farming (Quae, p. 91). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94-024–0986-4.
Király, 2013, Models of (future) society: Bringing social theories back in backcasting, Futures, 51, 19, 10.1016/j.futures.2013.05.001
Kirsch, A. (2022, février 3). Méthanisation, beaucoup d’argent public pour des effets contestables ? Le point de vue d’Olivier Allain. Agriculture Stratégies. https://www.agriculture-strategies.eu/2022/02/methanisation-beaucoup-dargent-public-des-effets-contestables-le-point-de-vue-dolivier-allain/.
Kosow, H. (2016). An exploratory study on forms and effects of new qualitative-quantitative scenario methodologies [Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart]. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/bitstream/11682/9032/1/Kosow_2016_The_best_of_both_worlds_Dissertation.pdf.
Koszel, 2015, Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7, 119, 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.004
Lallouët-Geffroy, J. (2019, janvier). La méthanisation risque d’accélérer la concentration des fermes. Reporterre. https://reporterre.net/La-methanisation-risque-d-accelerer-la-concentration-des-fermes.
Lüker-Jans, 2017, The impact of biogas plants on regional dynamics of permanent grassland and maize area—The example of Hesse, Germany (2005–2010, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 241, 24, 10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.023
Lumbroso, S. (2019). Prospective et stratégies pour l’environnement: Entre fabrique des futurs et situation de gestion, quelles prises pour l’action ? (p. 384 p.) [Phdthesis, Université Paris Saclay (COmUE)]. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02128459.
Mao, 2015, Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1823, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.141
Markard, 2016, Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy – A framework and a case study on biogas technology, Research Policy, 45, 330, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.009
Martin, 1995, Foresight in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7, 139, 10.1080/09537329508524202
Mazoyer, M. (1987). Dynamique des systèmes agraires, rapport de synthèse du colloque sur la dynamique des systèmes agraires.
Mermet, 2010, Concern-focused evaluation for ambiguous and conflicting policies: An approach from the environmental field, American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 180, 10.1177/1098214010366047
Meynard, 2001, L’évaluation et la conception de systèmes de culture pour une agriculture durable, Comptes Rendus Délelőtt l’Académie d’Agriculture Délelőtt France, 87, 223
Osty, 1998, Comment analyser les transformations de l’activité productrice des agriculteurs ? Propositions à partir des systèmes techniques de production, Études et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et Lengyel Développement, 397
Ouest-France. (2020, août 26). La méthanisation agricole à la française inquiète. https://www.ouest-france.fr/economie/agriculture/agriculture-la-methanisation-agricole-a-la-francaise-inquiete-6948650.
Paolini, 2018, Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 53, 899, 10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076
Patterson, 2011, An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK, Energy Policy, 39, 1806, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.017
Piutti, S., Laflotte, A., Ravard, B., Roux, Y.L., & Pacaud, S. (2022). Effets à court terme des digestats bruts de méthanisation sur la productivité fourragère et le fonctionnement microbiens des prairies en région Grand Est.
Robinson, 1991, The proof of the pudding: Making energy efficiency work, Energy Policy, 19, 631, 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90095-6
Shove, 2007, Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39, 763, 10.1068/a39310
Skenhall, 2013, Integration of bioenergy systems into UK agriculture-New options for management of nitrogen flows, Biomass and Bioenergy, 54, 219, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.002
Thomsen, 2013, Carbon dynamics and retention in soil after anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle feed and faeces, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 58, 82, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.006
Treyer, S. (2006). A quelle raréfaction de l’eau faut-il se préparer ? Construire une intervention prospective au service de la planification pour les ressources en eau en Tunisie [Phdthesis, ENGREF (AgroParisTech)]. https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00002653.
Treyer, 2009, Changing perspectives on foresight and strategy: From foresight project management to the management of change in collective strategic elaboration processes, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21, 353, 10.1080/09537320902750699
van Lente, 2012, Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: Lessons from the sociology of expectations, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24, 769, 10.1080/09537325.2012.715478
Von Cossel, 2019, Prospects of bioenergy cropping systems for a more social-ecologically sound bioeconomy, Agronomy, 9, 605, 10.3390/agronomy9100605
Wangel, 2011, Exploring social structures and agency in backcasting studies for sustainable development, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 872, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.007
Wiebe, 2018, Scenario development and foresight analysis: Exploring options to inform choices, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 545, 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030109