Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable

Applied Energy - Tập 179 - Trang 669-686 - 2016
Jacopo Bacenetti1, Cesare Sala2, Alessandra Fusi3, Marco Fiala1
1Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agronomy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy
2Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Bassini 15, Milan 20133, Italy
3School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The Mill, Sackville Street, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Messagie, 2014, The hourly life cycle carbon footprint of electricity generation in Belgium, bringing a temporal resolution in life cycle assessment, Appl Energy, 134, 469, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.071 Jin, 2015, Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant, Appl Energy, 151, 227, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.058 Pierie, 2016, A new approach for measuring the environmental sustainability of renewable energy production systems: focused on the modelling of green gas production pathways, Appl Energy, 162, 131, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.037 Patterson, 2011, Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale, Bioresour Technol, 102, 7313, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.063 Righi, 2013, Life cycle assessment of management systems for sewage sludge and food waste: centralized and decentralized approaches, J Clean Prod, 44, 8, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.004 Evangelisti, 2014, Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study, Waste Manage, 34, 226, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.013 Sosnowski, 2003, Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid wastes, Adv Environ Res, 7, 609, 10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00049-7 Murto, 2004, Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure, J Environ Manage, 70, 101, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.001 Show, 2012, Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge, Biol Sludge Minimization Biomater/Bioenergy Rec Technol, 319 Zhang, 2014, Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions, Appl Energy, 128, 175, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.071 Bernstad, 2012, Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems–current status and potential improvements, Waste Manage (New York, N.Y.), 32, 2439, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023 Laurent, 2014, Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems–part I: lessons learned and perspectives, Waste Manage (New York, N.Y.), 34, 573, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045 Sadhukhan, 2014, Distributed and micro-generation from biogas and agricultural application of sewage sludge: comparative environmental performance analysis using life cycle approaches, Appl Energy, 122, 196, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.051 Zheng, 2015, Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion, Appl Energy, 151, 249, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.078 Hijazi, 2016, Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 54, 1291, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.013 Fusi, 2016, Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 4, 26, 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00026 Whiting, 2014, Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion, Energy, 70, 181, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103 Negri, 2016, Evaluation of anaerobic degradation, biogas and digestate production of cereal silages using nylon-bags, Bioresour Technol, 209, 40, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.101 Negri, 2014, Biomethane production from different crop systems of cereals in Northern Italy, Biomass Bioenergy, 63, 321, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.041 EurObserv’ER. 15th annual overview barometer; 2015. <http://www.eurobserv-er.org/15th-annualoverview-barometer/>. Kral, 2015, Environmental effects of steam explosion pretreatment on biogas from maize—case study of a 500-kW Austrian biogas facility, BioEnergy Res, 9, 198, 10.1007/s12155-015-9676-0 ISO 14040, 2006 ISO 14044, 2006 ISO/TS 14067. Greenhouse gases – Carbon footprint of products – requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication; 2013. European Union, 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, Off J Eur Union, 52 Bacenetti, 2015, Economic performances of anaerobic digestion plants: effect of maize silage energy density at increasing transport distances, Biomass Bioenergy, 80, 73, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.034 Negri, 2014, Evaluation of methane production from maize silage by harvest of different plant portions, Biomass Bioenergy, 67, 339, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.016 Blengini, 2011, LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): a case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability, Resour Conserv Recycl, 57, 36, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.003 Bacenetti, 2013, Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process, Sci Total Environ, 541, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.058 Lansche, 2011, Life cycle assessment of biogas production at the research plant Unterer Lindenhof of the Universität Hohenheim, Landtechnik, 66, 216 Lansche, 2012, Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: environmental impact of different agricultural substrates, Eng Life Sci, 12, 313, 10.1002/elsc.201100061 Lijó, 2014, Life cycle assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops, Renew Energy, 68, 625, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.005 Meyer-Aurich, 2012, Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources, Renew Energy, 37, 277, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.030 Bachmaier, 2010, Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture, Eng Life Sci, 10, 560, 10.1002/elsc.201000073 Poeschl, 2010, Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways, Appl Energy, 87, 3305, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011 Poeschl, 2012, Environmental impacts of biogas deployment e Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air, J Clean Prod, 24, 168e183 Chevalier, 2005, Environmental assessment of biogas co- or tri-generation units by life cycle analysis methodology, Appl Therm Eng, 25, 3025, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.011 Styles, 2016, Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: an evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment, Sci Total Environ, 560–561, 241, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.236 Finnveden, 2009, Recent developments in life cycle assessment, J Environ Manage, 91, 1, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 Marvuglia, 2013, Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: critical review and proposed framework for biogas production, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 25, 768, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.031 Van Stappen, 2016, Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant, J Environ Manage, 175, 20, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.020 Rehl, 2012, Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—attributional vs. consequential approach, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 3766, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.072 Reinhard, 2009, Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment, J Clean Prod, 17, 46, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.05.003 Gutiérrez, 2015, Environmental assessment of pig production in Cienfuegos, Cuba: alternatives for manure management, J Clean Prod, 112, 2518, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.082 Bacenetti, 2016, Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system, Sci Total Environ, 539, 450, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.015 Bacenetti, 2015, Mitigation strategies in the agro-food sector: the anaerobic digestion of tomato puree by-products. An Italian case study, Sci Total Environ, 526, 88, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.069 Kimming, 2011, Biomass from agriculture in small-scale combined heat and power plants – a comparative life cycle assessment, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 1572, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.027 Adelt, 2011, LCA of biomethane, J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 3, 646, 10.1016/j.jngse.2011.07.003 Manninen, 2013, The applicability of the renewable energy directive calculation to assess the sustainability of biogas production, Energy Policy, 56, 549, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.040 Morero, 2015, Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina, Bioresour Technol, 182, 208, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.077 Ravina, 2015, Global and local emissions of a biogas plant considering the production of biomethane as an alternative end-use solution, J Clean Prod, 102, 115, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.056 Morero, 2015, Environmental impact assessment as a complement of life cycle assessment. Case study: upgrading of biogas, Bioresour Technol, 190, 402, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.091 Adams, 2015, Biomass sustainability criteria: greenhouse gas accounting issues for biogas and biomethane facilities, Energy Policy, 87, 95, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.031 Rapport, 2011, Modelling the performance of the anaerobic phased solids digester system for biogas energy production, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 1263, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.021 Hartmann, 2006 Bühle, 2012, Life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) in comparison to different energy recovery, animal-based and non-refining management systems, Bioresour Technol, 111, 230, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.072 Bühle, 2011, Comparative life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) and whole crop digestion (WCD) in Germany, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 363, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.056 Hamelin, 2014, Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas, Appl Energy, 114, 774, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.033 Lund, 2010, Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 15, 260, 10.1007/s11367-010-0164-7 Rana, 2015, Greenhouse gas emissions of an agro-biogas energy system: estimation under the renewable energy directive, Sci Total Environ, 550, 1182, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.164 Dressler, 2012, Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 17, 1104, 10.1007/s11367-012-0424-9 Wulf, 2006, Balancing of greenhouse gas emissions and economic efficiency for biogas-production through anaerobic co-fermentation of slurry with organic waste, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 112, 178, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.017 Hamelin, 2011, Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry, Environ Sci Technol, 45, 5869, 10.1021/es200273j Smith, 1998, Organic manure phosphorus accumulation, mobility and management, Soil Use Manage, 14, 154, 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1998.tb00634.x IPCC, 2007 Siegl, 2011, Green electricity from biomass, Part I: environmental impacts of direct life cycle emissions, Waste Biomass Valorization, 2, 267, 10.1007/s12649-011-9077-3 Siegl, 2011, Green electricity from biomass, Part II: environmental impacts considering avoided burdens from replacing the conventional provision of additional functions, Waste Biomass Valorization, 3, 1, 10.1007/s12649-011-9091-5 Boulamanti, 2013, Influence of different practices on biogas sustainability, Biomass Bioenergy, 53, 149, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.020 Bacenetti, 2015, Carbon footprint of electricity from anaerobic digestion plants in Italy, Environ Eng Manage J, 14, 1495, 10.30638/eemj.2015.161 Poeschl, 2012, Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways, J Clean Prod, 24, 184, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030 Power, 2009, Which is the preferable transport fuel on a greenhouse gas basis; biomethane or ethanol?, Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 1403e1412, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.06.004 Börjesson, 2015, Energy crop-based biogas as vehicle fuel—the impact of crop selection on energy efficiency and greenhouse gas performance, Energies, 8, 6033, 10.3390/en8066033 Börjesson, 2007, Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: the environmental impact of replacing various reference systems, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 326, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004 Lijó, 2014, Assuring the sustainable production of biogas from anaerobic mono-digestion, J Clean Prod, 72, 23, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.022 Lijó, 2015, Environmental assessment of farm-scaled anaerobic co-digestion for bioenergy production, Waste Manage (New York, N.Y.), 41, 50, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.043 Igoni, 2008, Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste, Appl Energy, 85, 430, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.07.013 Bacenetti, 2014, Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production, Sci Total Environ, 466–467, 1066, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.109 Bacenetti, 2015, The environmental burdens of maize silage production: Influence of different ensiling techniques, Anim Feed Sci Technol, 2015, 88, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.005 González-García, 2013, Comparative environmental performance of three different annual energy crops for biogas production in Northern Italy, J Clean Prod, 43, 71, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.017 Bacenetti, 2015, Assessment of the influence of energy density and feedstock transport distance on the environmental performance of methane from maize silages, Bioresour Technol, 193c, 256, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.067 Brentrup, 2000, Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 5, 349, 10.1007/BF02978670 Nemecek, 2007 Edelmann W, Schleiss K, Engeli H, Baier U. Ökobilanz der Stromgewinnung aus landwirtschaftlichem Biogas; 2011. Amon, 2006, Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 112, 153, 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030 Wang, 2014, Comparison of air emissions from raw liquid pig manure and biogas digester effluent storages, Trans ASABE, 57, 635 NERI, 2010 Althaus, 2007 Dones, 2007 Hischier, 2009 Jungbluth, 2007 Wolf MA, Pant R, Chomkhamsri K, Sala S, Pennington D. ILCD handbook-Towards more sustainable production and consumption for a resource efficient Europe. JRC Reference Report; 2012. Oenema, 2012 Spiermann, 2007 Huttunen, 2014, Combining biogas LCA reviews with stakeholder interviews to analyse life cycle impacts at a practical level, J Clean Prod, 80, 5, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.081 Bacenetti, 2014, Life cycle assessment of electricity production from anaerobic digestion of animal slurry in a farm scale plant, Proc Environ Sci Eng Manage, 1, 121 Buratti, 2013, Assessment of GHG emissions of biomethane from energy cereal crops in Umbria, Italy, Appl Energy, 108, 128, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.011 Capponi, 2012, CO2 savings affect the break-even distance of feedstock supply and digestate placement in biogas production, Renew Energy, 37, 45, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.005 Chen, 2012, Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization, Bioresour Technol, 114, 357, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.084 Cornejo, 2010, Greenhouse gas emissions and biogas potential from livestock in Ecuador, Energy Sustain Dev, 14, 256, 10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.008 Croxatto Vega, 2014, Choosing co-substrates to supplement biogas production from animal slurry – a life cycle assessment of the environmental consequences, Bioresour Technol, 171, 410, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.099 De Meester, 2012, The environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion as a biomass valorization technology, Bioresour Technol, 121, 396, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.109 De Vries, 2010 De Vries, 2012, Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy – a life cycle perspective, Bioresour Technol, 125, 239, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124 Ebner, 2015, Lifecycle greenhouse gas analysis of an anaerobic codigestion facility processing dairy manure and industrial food waste, Environ Sci Technol, 49, 11199, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01331 Fantin, 2015, Environmental assessment of electricity generation from an Italian anaerobic digestion plant, Biomass Bioenergy, 83, 422, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.015 Fuchsz, 2015, Comparison of the environmental effects of manure- and crop-based agricultural biogas plants using life cycle analysis, J Clean Prod, 86, 60, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.058 Gerin, 2008, Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion, Bioresour Technol, 99, 2620, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.049 Hahn, 2015, Comparative life cycle assessment of biogas plant configurations for a demand oriented biogas supply for flexible power generation, Bioresour Technol, 179, 348, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.007 Hennig, 2012, Bioenergy production and use: comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects, Energy Convers Manage, 63, 130, 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.031 Ingrao, 2015, Application of Carbon Footprint to an agro-biogas supply chain in Southern Italy, Appl Energy, 149, 75, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.111 Jury, 2010, Life cycle assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid, Biomass Bioenergy, 34, 54, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.09.011 Mezzullo, 2013, Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste, Appl Energy, 102, 657, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.008 Nzila, 2012, Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya, Appl Energy, 93, 496, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.020 Pacetti, 2015, Water–energy Nexus: a case of biogas production from energy crops evaluated by water footprint and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods, J Clean Prod, 101, 278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.084 Pehnt, 2006, Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies, Renew Energy, 31, 55, 10.1016/j.renene.2005.03.002 Pertl, 2010, Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems, Waste Manage (New York, N.Y.), 30, 92, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.011 Pucker, 2013, Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates implications for greenhouse gas emissions, Anim: Int J Anim Biosci, 7, 283, 10.1017/S1751731113000840 Rivas-García, 2015, Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective, Environ Technol, 36, 2198, 10.1080/09593330.2015.1024758 Rodriguez-Verde, 2014, Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters, Sci Total Environ, 497–498, 475, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.127 Schumacher, 2010, Life cycle assessment of the conversion of Zea mays and×Triticosecale into biogas and bioethanol, Eng Life Sci, 10, 577, 10.1002/elsc.201000069 Styles, 2014, Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms, GCB Bioenergy, 7, 1034, 10.1111/gcbb.12189 Tufvesson, 2013, Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed – life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards, J Clean Prod, 53, 214, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.005 Vu, 2015, Life cycle assessment of biogas production in small-scale household digesters in Vietnam, Asian-Austral J Anim Sci, 28, 716, 10.5713/ajas.14.0683 Wang, 2016, Life cycle assessment on biogas production from straw and its sensitivity analysis, Bioresour Technol, 201, 208, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.025 Xu, 2015, Life cycle assessment of food waste-based biogas generation, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 49, 169, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.164 Zhang, 2015, Life cycle analysis of a biogas-centred integrated dairy farm-greenhouse system in British Columbia, Process Saf Environ Prot, 93, 18, 10.1016/j.psep.2014.02.017 Zhang, 2013, Carbon emission reduction potential of a typical household biogas system in rural China, J Clean Prod, 47, 415, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.021 Guinée, 2002 Goedkoop MJ, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R. ReCiPe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, first ed. Report I: Characterisation; 2009. <www.lcia-recipe.net>. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R. The eco-indicator99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment: methodology report; 2001. Wenzel, 1997, vol. 1 Rosenbaum, 2008, USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 13, 532, 10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4 Jolliet, 2003, IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505