The Role of Emotion Regulation in Moral Judgment

Neuroethics - Tập 11 - Trang 297-308 - 2016
Chelsea Helion1, Kevin N. Ochsner1
1Columbia University, New York City, USA

Tóm tắt

Moral judgment has typically been characterized as a conflict between emotion and reason. In recent years, a central concern has been determining which process is the chief contributor to moral behavior. While classic moral theorists claimed that moral evaluations stem from consciously controlled cognitive processes, recent research indicates that affective processes may be driving moral behavior. Here, we propose a new way of thinking about emotion within the context of moral judgment, one in which affect is generated and transformed by both automatic and controlled processes, and moral evaluations are shifted accordingly. We begin with a review of how existing theories in psychology and neuroscience address the interaction between emotion and cognition, and how these theories may inform the study of moral judgment. We then describe how brain regions involved in both affective processing and moral judgment overlap and may make distinct contributions to the moral evaluation process. Finally, we discuss how this way of thinking about emotion can be reconciled with current theories in moral psychology before mapping out future directions in the study of moral behavior.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Keltner, D., and J.S. Lerner. 2010. Emotion. In The handbook of social psychology, 5th edn, eds. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindsay, 312–347. New York: McGraw Hill.

Cushman, F. 2013. Action, outcome, and value a dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17(3): 273–292.

Inbar, Y., D.A. Pizarro, and P. Bloom. 2009b. Conservatives are more easily disgusted. Cognition & Emotion 23: 714–725.

Inbar, Y., D.A. Pizarro, J. Knobe, and P. Bloom. 2009a. Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 9: 435–439.

Van Dillen, L.F., R.C. van der Wal, and K. van den Bos. 2012. On the role of attention and emotion in morality attentional control modulates unrelated disgust in moral judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(9): 1222–1231.

Mehl, M.R., and J.W. Pennebaker. 2003. The social dynamics of cultural upheaval: social interactions surrounding September 11th, 2001. Psychological Science 14(6): 579–585.

Cunningham, W.A., and T. Brosch. 2012. Motivational salience amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(1): 54–59.

Lieberman, M.D., N.I. Eisenberger, M.J. Crockett, S.M. Tom, J.H. Pfeifer, and B.M. Way. 2007. Putting feelings into words affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science 18(5): 421–428.

Teper, R., A.M. Tullett, E. Page-Gould, and M. Inzlicht. 2015. Errors in moral forecasting perceptions of affect shape the gap between moral behaviors and moral forecasts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(7): 887–900.

Cushman, F., L. Young, and M. Hauser. 2006. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science 17(12): 1082–1089.