Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology - Tập 45 - Trang 581-584 - 2009
Joshua D. Greene1
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartels, 2008, Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making, Cognition, 108, 381, 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 1992 Ciaramelli, 2007, Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 84, 10.1093/scan/nsm001 Cushman, 2006, The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm, Psychological Science, 17, 1082, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x Greene, 2007, The secret joke of Kant’s soul, Vol. 3 Greene, 2007, Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322, 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 Greene, J.D., Cushman, F.A., Stewart, L.E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L.E., & Cohen, J.D. (in press). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition. Greene, 2008, Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment, Cognition, 107, 1144, 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 Greene, 2004, The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment, Neuron, 44, 389, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 Greene, 2001, An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 293, 2105, 10.1126/science.1062872 Hardman, D. (2008). Moral dilemmas: Who makes utilitarian choices? Unpublished manuscript. Koenigs, 2007, Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements, Nature, 446, 908, 10.1038/nature05631 Mendez, 2005, An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia, Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 193, 10.1097/01.wnn.0000191292.17964.bb Mikhail, J. (2000). Rawls’ linguistic analogy: A study of the generative grammar model of moral theory described by John Rawls in a theory of justice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University. Miller, 2001, An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 Moll, 2007, Moral judgments, emotions, and the utilitarian brain, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001 Moore, 2008, Who shalt not kill?: Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment, Psychological Science, 19, 549, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x McGuire, 2009, A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 581, 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.002 Petrinovich, 1993, An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 467, 10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.467 Royzman, 2002, The preference for indirect harm, Social Justice Research, 15, 165, 10.1023/A:1019923923537 Schaich Borg, 2006, Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 803, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803 Thomson, 1985, The trolley problem, Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395, 10.2307/796133 Valdesolo, 2006, Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment, Psychological Science, 17, 476, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x Waldmann, 2007, Throwing a bomb on a person versus throwing a person on a bomb: Intervention myopia in moral intuitions, Psychological Science, 18, 247, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01884.x