thumbnail

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

  0022-1031

 

 

Cơ quản chủ quản:  ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE , Academic Press Inc.

Lĩnh vực:
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Psychology

Phân tích ảnh hưởng

Thông tin về tạp chí

 

Các bài báo tiêu biểu

Liking and the attribution process
Tập 10 - Trang 385-397 - 1974
Dennis T Regan, Ellen Straus, Russell Fazio
Attachment insecurity and perceived partner suffering as predictors of personal distress
Tập 46 - Trang 1143-1147 - 2010
Joan K. Monin, Richard Schulz, Brooke C. Feeney, Thomas B. Cook
Personality and Nonverbal Social Behavior: An Ethological Perspective of Relationship Initiation
Tập 29 - Trang 434-461 - 1993
Jeffry A. Simpson, Steven W. Gangestad, Michael Biek
Differential information use for near and distant decisions
Tập 46 - Trang 638-642 - 2010
Alison Ledgerwood, Cheryl J. Wakslak, Margery A. Wang
Dominance biases in the perception and memory for the faces of powerholders, with consequences for social inferences
Tập 78 - Trang 23-33 - 2018
Xijing Wang, Ana Guinote, Eva G. Krumhuber
Responses to Other-Imposed Pro-Black Pressure: Acceptance or Backlash?
Tập 37 - Trang 486-501 - 2001
E.Ashby Plant, Patricia G. Devine
When my wrongs are worse than yours: Behavioral and neural asymmetries in first-person and third-person perspectives of accidental harms
Tập 94 - Trang 104102 - 2021
Jiang Kevin, Anzellotti Stefano, Wasserman Emily, Young Liane, Hirschfeld-Kroen Joshua
Research on third-party moral judgments highlights two mechanisms as central to moral judgments of accidental harms: the inference of intent and the perception of harm. However, little is known about how these mechanisms are recruited when people evaluate themselves for harm that they have accidentally caused. Here we explore how a person's perspective — as either actor or observer — influences their moral judgments of accidental harm. We use fMRI to investigate how brain regions involved in the inference of intent and the perception of harm differentially respond when participants either cause (first-person) or observe (third-person) accidental harm. First, we find that people judge their own accidental harms more harshly than they judge others' accidents, and hold themselves more responsible for the unintended harmful outcomes of their choices. Second, we find that regions responding to the first-hand experience of pain are also more sensitive to first-person harms relative to third-person harms, and brain-behavior relationships in a subset of these regions suggest that the tendency to judge oneself more harshly may be supported by a greater sensitivity to the victim's experience of harm. Third, though we find that first-person harms recruit regions for mental state inference to a lesser extent than third-person harms, this difference does not appear to account for the behavioral differences in moral judgment between first-person and third-person harms. The results of this experiment suggest that accidental harms are an important context for broadening our understanding of the relationship between agency, empathy, and moral judgments about the self.
#Morality #Accident #Agency #Harm #Theory of mind #fMRI
Evidence that dissonance arousal is initially undifferentiated and only later labeled as negative
Tập 49 - Trang 767-770 - 2013
Marie-Amélie Martinie, Thierry Olive, Laurent Milland, Robert-Vincent Joule, Rémi L. Capa