Quản lý hiệu suất trong khu vực công

Emerald - Tập 22 Số 6 - Trang 478-498 - 2009
Karen Fryer1, Jiju Antony2, Susan Ogden1
1Caledonian Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
2Department of DMEM, Strathclyde Institute for Operations Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

Tóm tắt

Mục đíchMục đích của bài báo này là đánh giá tình trạng quản lý hiệu suất trong khu vực công và gợi ý những lĩnh vực cần nghiên cứu thêm.Thiết kếBài báo này mang tính lý thuyết và dựa trên một cuộc xem xét tài liệu.Kết quảCác cải thiện dự kiến về hiệu suất, trách nhiệm, tính minh bạch, chất lượng dịch vụ và giá trị đồng tiền vẫn chưa được hiện thực hóa trong khu vực công. Có ba loại vấn đề với quản lý hiệu suất trong khu vực công – kỹ thuật, hệ thống và sự tham gia. Các cơ cấu lại và tổ chức lại được áp đặt từ bên ngoài hạn chế việc triển khai thành công quản lý hiệu suất.Giới hạn/nghĩa lý của nghiên cứuBài báo này mang tính lý thuyết và nghiên cứu thực nghiệm để kiểm tra kết quả là cần thiết.Ý nghĩa thực tiễnCác phát hiện này có thể được sử dụng để cải thiện hệ thống quản lý hiệu suất trong cả khu vực công và tư.Tính độc đáo/gía trịBài báo cung cấp cái nhìn tổng quan về tình trạng quản lý và đo lường hiệu suất trong các tổ chức khu vực công và giải thích các tác động không mong muốn có thể xảy ra từ quản lý hiệu suất. Nó phân chia các vấn đề thành ba loại và đưa ra các gợi ý để cải thiện.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackroyd, S. (1995), “From public administration to public sector management. understanding contemporary change in British public services”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 19‐32.

Audit Commission (1993), Helping with Enquiries: Tackling Crime Effectively, HMSO, London.

Audit Commission (2002), Performance Breakthroughs: Improving Performance in Public Sector Organizations, Holbrooks, Portsmouth.

Audit Scotland (2006), Overview of the Local Authority Audits, Vol. 2005, Audit Scotland, Edinburgh.

Behn, R. (2005), “On the ludicrous search for the magical performance system”, Government Finance Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 63‐4.

Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006), “What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system”, Public Administration, Vol. 84 No. 3, pp. 517‐38.

Boyne, G. and Gould‐Williams, J. (2003), “Planning and performance in public organizations”, Public Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 115‐32.

Cranfield School of Management (2006), “Literature review on performance measurement and management”, available at: www.idea‐knowledge.gov.uk/idk/aio/306299 (accessed 6 December 2006).

Department for Education and Employment (2000), “Performance management: guidance for governors”, Department for Education and Employment, London, available at: www.dcsf.gov.uk/publications/guidanceonthelaw/dfeepub/jun00/pdf/060600.pdf (accessed 24 September 2008).

Ehrenberg, R. and Stupak, R. (1994), “Total quality management: its relationship to administrative theory and organizational behaviour in the public sector”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 75‐98.

Ferlie, E. and Steane, P. (2002), “Changing developments in NPM”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 25 No. 12, pp. 1459‐69.

Fryer, K. (2007), interviews with Strathclyde Police and West Dunbartonshire Council, Dumbarton.

Greatbanks, R. and Tapp, D. (2007), “The impact of balanced scorecards in a public sector environment: empirical evidence from Dunedin City Council, New Zealand”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 846‐73.

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary for Scotland (2005), “Managing improvement: a thematic inspection of performance management in the Scottish Police Service”, available at: www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/69582/0018021.pdf (accessed 28 November 2006).

HM Government (2007), The New Performance Framework for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnership. Single Set of National Indicators, Communities and Local Government Publications UK, London.

Holliday, I. (1995), The NHS Transformed, 2nd ed., Baseline Book Company, Manchester.

Hood, C. (1991), “A public management for all seasons?”, Public Administration, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 3‐19.

Hoque, Z. (2008), “Measuring and reporting public sector outputs/outcomes. Exploratory evidence from Australia”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 468‐93.

Leishman, F., Cope, S. and Starie, P. (1995), “Reforming the police in Britain: new public management, policy networks and a tough ‘old bill’”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 26‐37.

McAdam, R., Hazlett, S. and Casey, C. (2005), “Performance management in the UK public sector addressing multiple stakeholder complexity”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 256‐73.

Moxham, C. and Boaden, R. (2007), “The impact of performance measurement in the voluntary sector: identification of contextual and processual factors”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 826‐45.

Mwita, J. (2000), “Performance management model: a systems‐based approach to public service quality”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 19‐37.

Performance Management, Measurement and Information (2005), “PMMI Online conference summary report: embedding performance management frameworks and developing a performance management culture”, available at: www.idea‐knowledge.gov.uk/idk/aio/944892 (accessed 7 December 2006).

Pollanen, R. (2005), “Performance measurement in municipalities: empirical evidence in a Canadian context”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 4‐24.

Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Radin, B. (2003), “A comparative approach to performance management: contrasting the experience of Australia, New Zealand and the United States”, Vol. 26 No. 12, pp. 1355‐76.

Radnor, Z. (2008), “Muddled, massaging, manoeuvering or manipulated? A typology of organizational gaming”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 316‐28.

Ranade, W. (1994), A Future for the NHS? Health Care in the 1990s, Longman Group, London.

SAS Institute (2005), “Managing program performance in government: a best practices approach”, SAS White Paper No. 9, available at: www.sas.com/ci/whitepapers/102262.pdf (accessed 29 November 2006).

Scottish Executive (2006), available at: www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/07/21102410/19 (accessed 18 June 2007).

Sehested, K. (2002), “How new public management reforms challenge the roles of professionals”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 25 No. 12, pp. 1513‐37.

Stevens, P., Stokes, L. and O'Mahony, M. (2006), “Metrics, targets and performance”, National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 197, July, pp. 80‐92.

Tarr, J. (2004), available at: www.theacagroup.com/performancemeasurements.htm (accessed 15 June 2007).

Verbeeten, F. (2008), “Performance management practices in public sector organizations: impact on performance”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 427‐54.

Wisniewska, M. and Stewart, D. (2004), “Performance measurement for stakeholders: the case of Scottish local authorities”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 222‐33.

Zineldin, M. (2006), “The quality of health care and patient satisfaction: an exploratory investigation of the 5Qs model at some Egyptian and Jordanian medical clinics”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 60‐92.