Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector

International Journal of Public Sector Management - 1997
JamesGuthrie1, LindaEnglish2
1Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney, Australia
2Sydney University, Sydney, Australia

Tóm tắt

Performance measurement and programme evaluation have been promoted as a central mechanism of recent Australian public sector (APS) reform. Outlines recent reforms in the APS and identifies links between evaluation and performance information. Identifies the major issue of credibility, when performance information is produced internally and not verified externally. A lack of performance systems and standards can create difficulties for both internal and external programme evaluations. Concludes that: reforms introduced to evaluate performance in the APS were promoted with high expectations which have only partially been fulfilled; the present system is internally focused with a narrow role for evaluation and a lack of credibility because of the independence issue; the present systems associated with the performance approach and its evaluation are not providing enough information to deal with the tough questions of the effectiveness of government programmes. Proposes that a middle ground between internal and external programme evaluation strategies be adopted. This allows the strengths of internal evaluation to be retained. At the same time, it allows the possibility of improving programme evaluation by adding external independent verification and an extended effectiveness role.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amies, M. (1994, “Program evaluation: a Commonwealth perspective. Where are we now?”, in Guthrie, J. (Ed.) (1995), Making the Australian Public Sector Count in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney.

ANAO, (1991, Implementation of Program Evaluation ‐ Stage 1, Audit Report No. 23, 1990‐91, AGPS, Canberra.

ANAO, (1992a, Efficiency Audit: Evaluation in Preparation of the Budget, Audit Report No. 13, 1991‐92, AGPS, Canberra.

ANAO, (1992b, Efficiency Audit: Program Evaluation in the Department of Social Security and Primary Industry and Energy, Audit Report No. 26, 1991‐92, AGPS, Canberra.

ANAO, (1993, Efficiency Audit: Program Evaluation Strategies, Practices and Impacts, Audit Report No. 35, 1992‐93, AGPS, Canberra.

Australia, (1983), Reforming The Australian Public Sector, December, AGPS, Canberra.

Australian Public Service Board (APSB) and Finance, (1984, Financial Management Improvement Program: A Diagnostic Study, AGPS, Canberra.

Bartos, S. (1993, “Appropriate use of performance information management and accountability”, AIC Conference on Performance Management, 25 August.

Beringer, I, Chomiak, G, and Russell, H. (1986, Corporate Management: The Australian Public Sector, Hale & Iremonger, Sydney, pp. 11‐21.

Caulley, D. (1993a, “Qualitative methodologies within an evaluation framework”, in Guthrie J. (Ed.), The Australian Public Sector: Pathways to Change in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney, pp. 145‐50.

Caulley, D. (1993b, “Overview of approaches to programme evaluation: the five generations”, in Guthrie J. (Ed.), The Australian Public Sector: Pathways to Change in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney, pp. 124‐33.

Davis, G., Weller, P. and Lewis, C. (Eds) (1989, Corporate Management in Australian Government, Macmillan, Sydney.

Department of Finance, (1994, Commonwealth Financial Management Handbook, AGPS, Canberra.

Guthrie, J. (Ed.) (1993, The Australian Public Sector: Pathways to Change in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney.

Guthrie, J. (1994, “Performance measurement indicators in the Australian public sector”, in Buschor, E. (Ed.), Perspectives on Performance and Public Sector Accounting, UPT Publishers, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 259‐77.

Guthrie, J. (1995, Making the Australian Public Sector Count in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney.

Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (1996, “Public sector financial management developments in Australia and Britain: trends and contradictions”, Research in Government Non‐profit Accounting, Vol. 9, pp. 283‐302.

Guthrie, J., Parker, L.D. and Shand, D. (Eds) (1990, The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings in Accounting and Auditing, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Sydney.

House of Representatives Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration (HRSCFPA) (1990, Not Dollars Alone: A Review of the Financial Management Improvement Program, AGPS, Canberra.

McLean , I. (1993, “Are we talking the same language? Defining program evaluation”, in Guthrie, J., The Australian Public Sector: Pathways to Change in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney., pp. 120‐3.

Management Advisory Board and Management Improvement Advisory Committee: Commonwealth (MAB‐MIAC) (1993, Building a Better Public Service, AGPS, Canberra.

Parker, L. and Guthrie, J. (1993, “The Australian public sector in the 1990s: new accountability regimes in motion”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 57‐79.

Royal Commission Australian Government Administration (RCAGA) (1976, Report, AGPS, Canberra.

Shand, D. (1995, “International trends in public sector accounting”,. in Guthrie, J. (Ed., Making the Australian Public Sector Count in the 1990s, IIR Publications, Sydney, pp. 10‐14.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Public Sector Management

Thông tin tác giả